{"title":"Patient complaints are not common in emergency medical services: A mixed methods study","authors":"Sonja Mehtonen , Tuukka Puolakka , Jouni Kurola , Paulus Torkki","doi":"10.1016/j.ienj.2024.101552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Patient safety has become a central research theme in emergency medical services (EMS). The population age structure is changing in high-income countries, potentially causing increases in the need for EMS. As the number of EMS missions is growing, the safety of non-conveyance has become the topic of wide discussion. Managing adverse events is part of quality management and safety improvement. This study aimed to examine the incidence, reasons, and process of complaints related to EMS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective mixed methods study was conducted on EMS-related complaints that were evaluated by Regional State Administrative Agency during 2013–2019. The data was classified according to conveyance and authority’s decision, and finally analysed thematically.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The data included 73 complaints, 39 of which were included in the study. There were more complaints related to non-conveyance than conveyance. The authority provided administrative guidance in approximately half of the cases in both groups. One of the most common event types in both groups was related to ethical competence and conduct.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The number of complaints was very low. A considerable portion of the complaints related to paramedics’ behavior and patient treatment. Respecting and actively listening to patients may further decrease these complaints. No administrative caveats to paramedics were observed in our data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48914,"journal":{"name":"International Emergency Nursing","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 101552"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755599X24001472","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Patient safety has become a central research theme in emergency medical services (EMS). The population age structure is changing in high-income countries, potentially causing increases in the need for EMS. As the number of EMS missions is growing, the safety of non-conveyance has become the topic of wide discussion. Managing adverse events is part of quality management and safety improvement. This study aimed to examine the incidence, reasons, and process of complaints related to EMS.
Methods
A retrospective mixed methods study was conducted on EMS-related complaints that were evaluated by Regional State Administrative Agency during 2013–2019. The data was classified according to conveyance and authority’s decision, and finally analysed thematically.
Results
The data included 73 complaints, 39 of which were included in the study. There were more complaints related to non-conveyance than conveyance. The authority provided administrative guidance in approximately half of the cases in both groups. One of the most common event types in both groups was related to ethical competence and conduct.
Conclusions
The number of complaints was very low. A considerable portion of the complaints related to paramedics’ behavior and patient treatment. Respecting and actively listening to patients may further decrease these complaints. No administrative caveats to paramedics were observed in our data.
期刊介绍:
International Emergency Nursing is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to nurses and other professionals involved in emergency care. It aims to promote excellence through dissemination of high quality research findings, specialist knowledge and discussion of professional issues that reflect the diversity of this field. With an international readership and authorship, it provides a platform for practitioners worldwide to communicate and enhance the evidence-base of emergency care.
The journal publishes a broad range of papers, from personal reflection to primary research findings, created by first-time through to reputable authors from a number of disciplines. It brings together research from practice, education, theory, and operational management, relevant to all levels of staff working in emergency care settings worldwide.