Rural disability, self-reliance, and the utilization of mental health services.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Luke Santore, Catherine Ipsen, Gilbert Gimm
{"title":"Rural disability, self-reliance, and the utilization of mental health services.","authors":"Luke Santore, Catherine Ipsen, Gilbert Gimm","doi":"10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The intersection of rurality, disability, self-reliance values, and utilization rates of mental health services (MHS) is under-researched.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To better understand the differences between unmet need and no perceived need for MHS between noncore, micropolitan, and metropolitan adults with disabilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted logistic regression analyses of the 2022 National Survey on Health and Disability (NSHD) to identify associations between demographic characteristics and odds of reporting unmet need for MHS or no perceived need for MHS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Living in a noncore area, being male, lower educational attainment, older age, vision disability, and ambulatory disability were significantly associated with increased odds of reporting no perceived need for MHS. Being LGBTQIA+, poor transportation access, and cognitive disability were significantly associated with decreased odds of reporting no perceived need for MHS. Cognitive disability, cohabitation, and poor transportation access were significantly associated with increased odds of reporting unmet need for MHS. Conversely, being male, having some college and/or a two-year degree were significantly associated with decreased odds of reporting unmet need for MHS. There were not significant differences in unmet need for MHS across rural indicators.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No perceived need of MHS is an underexplored factor among rural and urban adults with disabilities. Solutions include policies to expand MHS access, tailored public health outreach, and provider communication training.</p>","PeriodicalId":49300,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"101761"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101761","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The intersection of rurality, disability, self-reliance values, and utilization rates of mental health services (MHS) is under-researched.

Objective: To better understand the differences between unmet need and no perceived need for MHS between noncore, micropolitan, and metropolitan adults with disabilities.

Methods: We conducted logistic regression analyses of the 2022 National Survey on Health and Disability (NSHD) to identify associations between demographic characteristics and odds of reporting unmet need for MHS or no perceived need for MHS.

Results: Living in a noncore area, being male, lower educational attainment, older age, vision disability, and ambulatory disability were significantly associated with increased odds of reporting no perceived need for MHS. Being LGBTQIA+, poor transportation access, and cognitive disability were significantly associated with decreased odds of reporting no perceived need for MHS. Cognitive disability, cohabitation, and poor transportation access were significantly associated with increased odds of reporting unmet need for MHS. Conversely, being male, having some college and/or a two-year degree were significantly associated with decreased odds of reporting unmet need for MHS. There were not significant differences in unmet need for MHS across rural indicators.

Conclusion: No perceived need of MHS is an underexplored factor among rural and urban adults with disabilities. Solutions include policies to expand MHS access, tailored public health outreach, and provider communication training.

农村残疾、自力更生和利用精神卫生服务。
背景:农村、残疾、自力更生价值观与心理健康服务(MHS)使用率的交叉关系研究不足。目的:更好地了解非核心、小城市和大城市残疾成人MHS未满足需求和无感知需求之间的差异。方法:我们对2022年全国健康与残疾调查(NSHD)进行了logistic回归分析,以确定人口统计学特征与报告未满足MHS需求或没有感知到MHS需求的几率之间的关联。结果:居住在非核心地区、男性、受教育程度较低、年龄较大、视力障碍和行动障碍与报告不需要MHS的几率显著相关。LGBTQIA+、交通不便和认知障碍与报告不需要MHS的几率显著降低相关。认知障碍、同居和交通不便与报告未满足MHS需求的几率增加显著相关。相反,作为男性,拥有一些大学和/或两年制学位与报告未满足MHS需求的几率显著降低相关。各农村指标未满足的卫生保健需求没有显著差异。结论:在农村和城市残疾成人中,没有感知到MHS需求是一个未被充分研究的因素。解决方案包括扩大MHS准入的政策、量身定制的公共卫生外展以及提供者沟通培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Disability and Health Journal
Disability and Health Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
134
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Disability and Health Journal is a scientific, scholarly, and multidisciplinary journal for reporting original contributions that advance knowledge in disability and health. Topics may be related to global health, quality of life, and specific health conditions as they relate to disability. Such contributions include: • Reports of empirical research on the characteristics of persons with disabilities, environment, health outcomes, and determinants of health • Reports of empirical research on the Systematic or other evidence-based reviews and tightly conceived theoretical interpretations of research literature • Reports of empirical research on the Evaluative research on new interventions, technologies, and programs • Reports of empirical research on the Reports on issues or policies affecting the health and/or quality of life for persons with disabilities, using a scientific base.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信