{"title":"Vaginal progesterone for prevention of preterm birth in women with a history of preterm birth regardless of cervical length: an argument for use","authors":"Charlette E. Williams MD, Rupsa C. Boelig MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>It is well understood that preterm birth accounts for a substantial amount of poor neonatal outcomes. In 2022, preterm birth affected about 1 of every 10 infants born in the United States with complications ranging from mild respiratory distress syndrome to neonatal death. The complexity of the treatment is secondary to the fact that preterm birth is a multifactorial syndrome with intricate sociocultural factors that influence our racially disproportionate poor outcomes. One of the key risk factors for preterm birth is a history of spontaneous preterm birth. Currently, there are conflicting recommendations regarding the use of vaginal progesterone prophylactically for the prevention of recurrent preterm birth. As described in Practice Bulletin number 234 of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the current recommendation is that patients with a singleton pregnancy and previous spontaneous preterm birth should be assessed with serial endovaginal ultrasound cervical length measurements to determine eligibility for vaginal progesterone. In contrast, the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine suggests the use of prophylactic vaginal progesterone with patient-centered counseling and shared decision-making. We aimed to present the rationale for the use of prophylactic vaginal progesterone in patients with singleton gestations and a history of spontaneous preterm birth.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":"7 1","pages":"Article 101565"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258993332400291X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
It is well understood that preterm birth accounts for a substantial amount of poor neonatal outcomes. In 2022, preterm birth affected about 1 of every 10 infants born in the United States with complications ranging from mild respiratory distress syndrome to neonatal death. The complexity of the treatment is secondary to the fact that preterm birth is a multifactorial syndrome with intricate sociocultural factors that influence our racially disproportionate poor outcomes. One of the key risk factors for preterm birth is a history of spontaneous preterm birth. Currently, there are conflicting recommendations regarding the use of vaginal progesterone prophylactically for the prevention of recurrent preterm birth. As described in Practice Bulletin number 234 of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the current recommendation is that patients with a singleton pregnancy and previous spontaneous preterm birth should be assessed with serial endovaginal ultrasound cervical length measurements to determine eligibility for vaginal progesterone. In contrast, the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine suggests the use of prophylactic vaginal progesterone with patient-centered counseling and shared decision-making. We aimed to present the rationale for the use of prophylactic vaginal progesterone in patients with singleton gestations and a history of spontaneous preterm birth.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) is a highly esteemed publication with two companion titles. One of these is the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Maternal-Fetal Medicine (AJOG MFM), which is dedicated to the latest research in the field of maternal-fetal medicine, specifically concerning high-risk pregnancies. The journal encompasses a wide range of topics, including:
Maternal Complications: It addresses significant studies that have the potential to change clinical practice regarding complications faced by pregnant women.
Fetal Complications: The journal covers prenatal diagnosis, ultrasound, and genetic issues related to the fetus, providing insights into the management and care of fetal health.
Prenatal Care: It discusses the best practices in prenatal care to ensure the health and well-being of both the mother and the unborn child.
Intrapartum Care: It provides guidance on the care provided during the childbirth process, which is critical for the safety of both mother and baby.
Postpartum Issues: The journal also tackles issues that arise after childbirth, focusing on the postpartum period and its implications for maternal health. AJOG MFM serves as a reliable forum for peer-reviewed research, with a preference for randomized trials and meta-analyses. The goal is to equip researchers and clinicians with the most current information and evidence-based strategies to effectively manage high-risk pregnancies and to provide the best possible care for mothers and their unborn children.