Analyzing Patient Experience on Weibo: Machine Learning Approach to Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Xiao Chen, Zhiyun Shen, Tingyu Guan, Yuchen Tao, Yichen Kang, Yuxia Zhang
{"title":"Analyzing Patient Experience on Weibo: Machine Learning Approach to Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis.","authors":"Xiao Chen, Zhiyun Shen, Tingyu Guan, Yuchen Tao, Yichen Kang, Yuxia Zhang","doi":"10.2196/59249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social media platforms allow individuals to openly gather, communicate, and share information about their interactions with health care services, becoming an essential supplemental means of understanding patient experience.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to identify common discussion topics related to health care experience from the public's perspective and to determine areas of concern from patients' perspectives that health care providers should act on.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study conducted a spatiotemporal analysis of the volume, sentiment, and topic of patient experience-related posts on the Weibo platform developed by Sina Corporation. We applied a supervised machine learning approach including human annotation and machine learning-based models for topic modeling and sentiment analysis of the public discourse. A multiclassifier voting method based on logistic regression, multinomial naïve Bayes, and random forest was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4008 posts were manually classified into patient experience topics. A patient experience theme framework was developed. The accuracy, precision, recall, and F-measure of the method integrating logistic regression, multinomial naïve Bayes, and random forest for patient experience themes were 0.93, 0.95, 0.80, 0.77, and 0.84, respectively, indicating a satisfactory prediction. The sentiment analysis revealed that negative sentiment posts constituted the highest proportion (3319/4008, 82.81%). Twenty patient experience themes were discussed on the social media platform. The majority of the posts described the interpersonal aspects of care (2947/4008, 73.53%); the five most frequently discussed topics were \"health care professionals' attitude,\" \"access to care,\" \"communication, information, and education,\" \"technical competence,\" and \"efficacy of treatment.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hospital administrators and clinicians should consider the value of social media and pay attention to what patients and their family members are communicating on social media. To increase the utility of these data, a machine learning algorithm can be used for topic modeling. The results of this study highlighted the interpersonal and functional aspects of care, especially the interpersonal aspects, which are often the \"moment of truth\" during a service encounter in which patients make a critical evaluation of hospital services.</p>","PeriodicalId":56334,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Informatics","volume":"12 ","pages":"e59249"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11623958/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/59249","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social media platforms allow individuals to openly gather, communicate, and share information about their interactions with health care services, becoming an essential supplemental means of understanding patient experience.

Objective: We aimed to identify common discussion topics related to health care experience from the public's perspective and to determine areas of concern from patients' perspectives that health care providers should act on.

Methods: This study conducted a spatiotemporal analysis of the volume, sentiment, and topic of patient experience-related posts on the Weibo platform developed by Sina Corporation. We applied a supervised machine learning approach including human annotation and machine learning-based models for topic modeling and sentiment analysis of the public discourse. A multiclassifier voting method based on logistic regression, multinomial naïve Bayes, and random forest was used.

Results: A total of 4008 posts were manually classified into patient experience topics. A patient experience theme framework was developed. The accuracy, precision, recall, and F-measure of the method integrating logistic regression, multinomial naïve Bayes, and random forest for patient experience themes were 0.93, 0.95, 0.80, 0.77, and 0.84, respectively, indicating a satisfactory prediction. The sentiment analysis revealed that negative sentiment posts constituted the highest proportion (3319/4008, 82.81%). Twenty patient experience themes were discussed on the social media platform. The majority of the posts described the interpersonal aspects of care (2947/4008, 73.53%); the five most frequently discussed topics were "health care professionals' attitude," "access to care," "communication, information, and education," "technical competence," and "efficacy of treatment."

Conclusions: Hospital administrators and clinicians should consider the value of social media and pay attention to what patients and their family members are communicating on social media. To increase the utility of these data, a machine learning algorithm can be used for topic modeling. The results of this study highlighted the interpersonal and functional aspects of care, especially the interpersonal aspects, which are often the "moment of truth" during a service encounter in which patients make a critical evaluation of hospital services.

微博患者体验分析:主题建模和情感分析的机器学习方法。
背景:社交媒体平台允许个人公开收集、交流和分享他们与医疗保健服务互动的信息,成为了解患者体验的重要补充手段。目的:我们旨在从公众的角度确定与卫生保健经验相关的共同讨论主题,并从患者的角度确定卫生保健提供者应采取行动的关注领域。方法:本研究对新浪公司开发的微博平台上患者体验相关帖子的数量、情绪和话题进行时空分析。我们应用了一种有监督的机器学习方法,包括人类注释和基于机器学习的模型,用于公共话语的主题建模和情感分析。采用了基于logistic回归、多项式naïve贝叶斯和随机森林的多分类器投票方法。结果:共有4008篇帖子被人工分类为患者体验主题。开发了患者体验主题框架。结合logistic回归、多项naïve贝叶斯和随机森林的方法对患者体验主题的准确率、精密度、召回率和F-measure分别为0.93、0.95、0.80、0.77和0.84,表明预测令人满意。情绪分析结果显示,负面情绪帖子所占比例最高(3319/4008,82.81%)。在社交媒体平台上讨论了20个患者体验主题。大多数帖子描述了人际方面的护理(2947/4008,73.53%);最常讨论的五个话题是“卫生保健专业人员的态度”、“获得护理”、“沟通、信息和教育”、“技术能力”和“治疗效果”。结论:医院管理者和临床医生应考虑到社交媒体的价值,关注患者及其家属在社交媒体上的交流内容。为了提高这些数据的效用,可以使用机器学习算法进行主题建模。本研究的结果突出了护理的人际关系和功能方面,特别是人际关系方面,这往往是在患者对医院服务进行关键评估的服务过程中的“关键时刻”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Medical Informatics
JMIR Medical Informatics Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
173
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR Medical Informatics (JMI, ISSN 2291-9694) is a top-rated, tier A journal which focuses on clinical informatics, big data in health and health care, decision support for health professionals, electronic health records, ehealth infrastructures and implementation. It has a focus on applied, translational research, with a broad readership including clinicians, CIOs, engineers, industry and health informatics professionals. Published by JMIR Publications, publisher of the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR), the leading eHealth/mHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175), JMIR Med Inform has a slightly different scope (emphasizing more on applications for clinicians and health professionals rather than consumers/citizens, which is the focus of JMIR), publishes even faster, and also allows papers which are more technical or more formative than what would be published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信