Identifying neural circuitry abnormalities in neuropathic pain with transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalogram co-registration.

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Zhimin Huang, Ying Wang, Yongxing Yan, Ying Liu, Jielin Chen, Huili Liu, Jie Li, Zhongming Gao, Xianwei Che
{"title":"Identifying neural circuitry abnormalities in neuropathic pain with transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalogram co-registration.","authors":"Zhimin Huang, Ying Wang, Yongxing Yan, Ying Liu, Jielin Chen, Huili Liu, Jie Li, Zhongming Gao, Xianwei Che","doi":"10.1016/j.neurot.2024.e00496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) technology such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) represents a promising treatment for neuropathic pain. However, neural circuitries underlying analgesia remain to be established, which is largely limiting treatment responses. Using TMS and electroencephalogram co-registration (TMS-EEG), this study quantified the circuitry abnormalities in neuropathic pain and their associations with pain symptoms. A group of 21 neuropathic pain individuals and 21 healthy controls were assessed with TMS-EEG delivering to the primary motor cortex (M1). With source modelling, local current density and current propagation were analysed with significant current density (SCD) and scattering (SCS) respectively. The SCS and SCD data converged on higher activities in neuropathic pain individuals than healthy controls, within the emotional affective (perigenual anterior cingulate cortex, pgACC), sensory nociceptive (primary somatosensory cortex, S1), and the attentional cognitive (anterior insula, aINS; supracallosal anterior cingulate cortex, scACC) structures of pain. Moreover, current propagation to the pgACC was associated with lower pain-related negative emotions, while current propagation to the aINS with higher pain-related negative emotions. Using concurrent TMS-EEG, our data identified abnormal pain circuitries that could be utilised to improve treatment efficacy with brain stimulation technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19159,"journal":{"name":"Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"e00496"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurot.2024.e00496","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) technology such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) represents a promising treatment for neuropathic pain. However, neural circuitries underlying analgesia remain to be established, which is largely limiting treatment responses. Using TMS and electroencephalogram co-registration (TMS-EEG), this study quantified the circuitry abnormalities in neuropathic pain and their associations with pain symptoms. A group of 21 neuropathic pain individuals and 21 healthy controls were assessed with TMS-EEG delivering to the primary motor cortex (M1). With source modelling, local current density and current propagation were analysed with significant current density (SCD) and scattering (SCS) respectively. The SCS and SCD data converged on higher activities in neuropathic pain individuals than healthy controls, within the emotional affective (perigenual anterior cingulate cortex, pgACC), sensory nociceptive (primary somatosensory cortex, S1), and the attentional cognitive (anterior insula, aINS; supracallosal anterior cingulate cortex, scACC) structures of pain. Moreover, current propagation to the pgACC was associated with lower pain-related negative emotions, while current propagation to the aINS with higher pain-related negative emotions. Using concurrent TMS-EEG, our data identified abnormal pain circuitries that could be utilised to improve treatment efficacy with brain stimulation technologies.

经颅磁刺激和脑电图联合登记识别神经性疼痛的神经回路异常。
非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)技术,如经颅磁刺激(TMS)是一种很有前途的治疗神经性疼痛的方法。然而,镇痛背后的神经回路仍有待建立,这在很大程度上限制了治疗反应。利用经颅磁刺激和脑电图联合登记(TMS- eeg),本研究量化了神经性疼痛的电路异常及其与疼痛症状的关系。21名神经性疼痛患者和21名健康对照者通过向初级运动皮层(M1)传递TMS-EEG进行评估。在源模型的基础上,分别用显著电流密度(SCD)和散射(SCS)分析了局部电流密度和电流传播。SCS和SCD数据表明,神经性疼痛患者的情绪情感(前扣带皮层,pgACC)、感觉伤害感受(初级体感皮层,S1)和注意认知(前岛,aINS;胼胝体上前扣带皮层(scACC)的疼痛结构。此外,电流传播到pgACC与较低的疼痛相关负面情绪相关,而电流传播到ais与较高的疼痛相关负面情绪相关。通过并发TMS-EEG,我们的数据确定了异常的疼痛回路,可以利用脑刺激技术提高治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurotherapeutics
Neurotherapeutics 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
3.50%
发文量
154
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurotherapeutics® is the journal of the American Society for Experimental Neurotherapeutics (ASENT). Each issue provides critical reviews of an important topic relating to the treatment of neurological disorders written by international authorities. The Journal also publishes original research articles in translational neuroscience including descriptions of cutting edge therapies that cross disciplinary lines and represent important contributions to neurotherapeutics for medical practitioners and other researchers in the field. Neurotherapeutics ® delivers a multidisciplinary perspective on the frontiers of translational neuroscience, provides perspectives on current research and practice, and covers social and ethical as well as scientific issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信