Causal roles of dietary structure and types on prostate cancer risk: A mendelian randomization study.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Chengyong Li, Zhinan Jing, Qiang Guo, Zhanlong Zheng, Xingming Zhao, Weijun Yuan, Yujia Xi, Jingqi Wang
{"title":"Causal roles of dietary structure and types on prostate cancer risk: A mendelian randomization study.","authors":"Chengyong Li, Zhinan Jing, Qiang Guo, Zhanlong Zheng, Xingming Zhao, Weijun Yuan, Yujia Xi, Jingqi Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12885-024-13252-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Numerous observational studies have reported a strong link between dietary habits and the risk of prostate cancer. However, these studies are susceptible to confounding factors. To address this question, we conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study to explore the causal relationship between dietary habits and prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Genetic data for 25 different diet types were obtained from UK Biobank. Summary-level data on dietary composition and prostate cancer were obtained from a large genome-wide association study (GWAS). We employed the inverse variance weighted (IVW) for the primary analysis to examine the causal relationship between dietary components, dietary types, and prostate cancer. We also conducted sensitivity analyses using the Steiger filter, MR-Egger intercept test, Cochran's Q statistic, funnel plot, and leave-one-out analysis were used for sensitivity analysis to ensure the robustness of our findings.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>IVW results showed that relative fat intake (OR = 0.57, 95%CI: 0.33-1.00, P < 0.05) and canned tomato intake (OR = 0.73, 95%CI: 0.60 ~ 0.87, P < 0.01) and green bean intake (OR = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.74 ~ 0.98, P = 0.03) may be protective factors for prostate cancer. In contrast, relative sugar intake (OR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.03-2.00, P = 0.03) may increase the risk of prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Relative fat intake, green bean intake, and canned tomato intake may have a protective causal effect against prostate cancer, while relative sugar intake may increase the risk of prostate cancer. R These insights have implications for developing prevention strategies and interventions targeting dietary intake to prevent prostate cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"24 1","pages":"1476"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13252-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Numerous observational studies have reported a strong link between dietary habits and the risk of prostate cancer. However, these studies are susceptible to confounding factors. To address this question, we conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study to explore the causal relationship between dietary habits and prostate cancer.

Methods: Genetic data for 25 different diet types were obtained from UK Biobank. Summary-level data on dietary composition and prostate cancer were obtained from a large genome-wide association study (GWAS). We employed the inverse variance weighted (IVW) for the primary analysis to examine the causal relationship between dietary components, dietary types, and prostate cancer. We also conducted sensitivity analyses using the Steiger filter, MR-Egger intercept test, Cochran's Q statistic, funnel plot, and leave-one-out analysis were used for sensitivity analysis to ensure the robustness of our findings.

Result: IVW results showed that relative fat intake (OR = 0.57, 95%CI: 0.33-1.00, P < 0.05) and canned tomato intake (OR = 0.73, 95%CI: 0.60 ~ 0.87, P < 0.01) and green bean intake (OR = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.74 ~ 0.98, P = 0.03) may be protective factors for prostate cancer. In contrast, relative sugar intake (OR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.03-2.00, P = 0.03) may increase the risk of prostate cancer.

Conclusions: Relative fat intake, green bean intake, and canned tomato intake may have a protective causal effect against prostate cancer, while relative sugar intake may increase the risk of prostate cancer. R These insights have implications for developing prevention strategies and interventions targeting dietary intake to prevent prostate cancer.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信