Exploring the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceptions of Hospital Staff and Patients on Environmental Sustainability in the Operating Room: Quality Improvement Survey Study.

Nicole Kasia Stachura, Sukham K Brar, Jacob Davidson, Claire A Wilson, Celia Dann, Mike Apostol, John Vecchio, Shannon Bilodeau, Anna Gunz, Diana Catalina Casas-Lopez, Ruediger Noppens, Ken Leslie, Julie E Strychowsky
{"title":"Exploring the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceptions of Hospital Staff and Patients on Environmental Sustainability in the Operating Room: Quality Improvement Survey Study.","authors":"Nicole Kasia Stachura, Sukham K Brar, Jacob Davidson, Claire A Wilson, Celia Dann, Mike Apostol, John Vecchio, Shannon Bilodeau, Anna Gunz, Diana Catalina Casas-Lopez, Ruediger Noppens, Ken Leslie, Julie E Strychowsky","doi":"10.2196/59790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Canada, the health care system has been estimated to generate 33 million metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions annually. Health care systems, specifically operating rooms (ORs), are significant contributors to greenhouse gas emissions, using 3 to 6 times more energy than the hospital's average unit.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This quality improvement study aimed to investigate the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of staff members and patients on sustainability in the OR, as well as identify opportunities for initiatives and barriers to implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 2 surveys were developed, consisting of 27 questions for staff members and 22 questions for patients and caregivers. Topics included demographics, knowledge and attitudes regarding environmental sustainability, opportunities for initiatives, and perceived barriers. Multiple-choice, Likert-scale, and open-ended questions were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 174 staff members and 37 patients participated. The majority (152/174, 88%) of staff members had received no and minimal training on sustainability, while 93% (162/174) cited practicing sustainability at work as moderately to extremely important. Among patients and caregivers, 54% (20/37) often or always noticed when a hospital is being eco-friendly. Both staff members and patients agreed that improving sustainability would boost satisfaction (125/174, 71.8% and 22/37, 59.4%, respectively) and hospital reputation (22/37, 59.4% and 25/37, 69.5%, respectively). The staff members' highest-rated environmental initiatives included transitioning to reusables, education, and improved energy consumption, while patients prioritized increased nature, improved food sourcing, and education. Perceived barriers to these initiatives included cost, lack of education, and lack of incentives.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Staff members and patients and caregivers in a large academic health care center acknowledge the significance of environmental sustainability in the OR. While they do not perceive a direct impact on patient care, they anticipate positive effects on satisfaction and hospital reputation. Aligning initiatives with staff members and patient and caregiver preferences can help drive meaningful change within the OR and beyond.</p>","PeriodicalId":73557,"journal":{"name":"JMIR perioperative medicine","volume":"7 ","pages":"e59790"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11638685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR perioperative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/59790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Canada, the health care system has been estimated to generate 33 million metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions annually. Health care systems, specifically operating rooms (ORs), are significant contributors to greenhouse gas emissions, using 3 to 6 times more energy than the hospital's average unit.

Objective: This quality improvement study aimed to investigate the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of staff members and patients on sustainability in the OR, as well as identify opportunities for initiatives and barriers to implementation.

Methods: A total of 2 surveys were developed, consisting of 27 questions for staff members and 22 questions for patients and caregivers. Topics included demographics, knowledge and attitudes regarding environmental sustainability, opportunities for initiatives, and perceived barriers. Multiple-choice, Likert-scale, and open-ended questions were used.

Results: A total of 174 staff members and 37 patients participated. The majority (152/174, 88%) of staff members had received no and minimal training on sustainability, while 93% (162/174) cited practicing sustainability at work as moderately to extremely important. Among patients and caregivers, 54% (20/37) often or always noticed when a hospital is being eco-friendly. Both staff members and patients agreed that improving sustainability would boost satisfaction (125/174, 71.8% and 22/37, 59.4%, respectively) and hospital reputation (22/37, 59.4% and 25/37, 69.5%, respectively). The staff members' highest-rated environmental initiatives included transitioning to reusables, education, and improved energy consumption, while patients prioritized increased nature, improved food sourcing, and education. Perceived barriers to these initiatives included cost, lack of education, and lack of incentives.

Conclusions: Staff members and patients and caregivers in a large academic health care center acknowledge the significance of environmental sustainability in the OR. While they do not perceive a direct impact on patient care, they anticipate positive effects on satisfaction and hospital reputation. Aligning initiatives with staff members and patient and caregiver preferences can help drive meaningful change within the OR and beyond.

探索医院员工和患者对手术室环境可持续性的知识、态度和看法:质量改善调查研究。
背景:在加拿大,卫生保健系统估计每年产生3300万公吨的温室气体排放。卫生保健系统,特别是手术室(or),是温室气体排放的重要贡献者,使用的能源比医院的平均单位多3到6倍。目的:本质量改进研究旨在调查工作人员和患者对手术室可持续性的知识、态度和看法,并确定实施的机会和障碍。方法:共进行2项问卷调查,其中工作人员问卷27题,患者及护理人员问卷22题。主题包括人口统计、关于环境可持续性的知识和态度、倡议的机会以及感知到的障碍。采用多项选择题、李克特量表和开放式问题。结果:共174名工作人员参与,37名患者参与。大多数(152/ 174,88%)员工没有接受或只接受过最少的可持续发展培训,而93%(162/174)的员工认为在工作中实践可持续发展是中等至极其重要的。在患者和护理人员中,54%(20/37)经常或总是注意到医院何时是环保的。工作人员和患者都认为,改善可持续性可以提高满意度(125/174,71.8%和22/37,59.4%)和医院声誉(22/37,59.4%和25/37,69.5%)。工作人员评价最高的环保举措包括向可重复使用物品过渡、教育和改善能源消耗,而患者优先考虑的是增加自然环境、改善食物来源和教育。这些举措的障碍包括成本、缺乏教育和缺乏激励。结论:一家大型学术医疗中心的工作人员、患者和护理人员认识到手术室环境可持续性的重要性。虽然他们没有察觉到对病人护理的直接影响,但他们预计会对满意度和医院声誉产生积极影响。将计划与工作人员、患者和护理人员的偏好结合起来,可以帮助推动手术室内外有意义的变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信