Patients' psychosocial attributes and aggressiveness of cancer treatments near the end of life.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Oncologist Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyae317
Léa Restivo, Philippe Rochigneux, Anne-Déborah Bouhnik, Thomas Arciszewski, Aurélie Bourmaud, Géraldine Capodano, Agnès Ducoulombier, Julien Mancini, Florence Duffaud, Anthony Gonçalves, Thémis Apostolidis, Aurélien Proux
{"title":"Patients' psychosocial attributes and aggressiveness of cancer treatments near the end of life.","authors":"Léa Restivo, Philippe Rochigneux, Anne-Déborah Bouhnik, Thomas Arciszewski, Aurélie Bourmaud, Géraldine Capodano, Agnès Ducoulombier, Julien Mancini, Florence Duffaud, Anthony Gonçalves, Thémis Apostolidis, Aurélien Proux","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyae317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While the use of chemotherapy near the end of life (EOL) has been identified as a relevant criterion for assessing quality of cancer care and has been estimated as non-beneficial, a trend of aggressiveness in cancer care during the last period of life remains. Both patients' sociodemographic characteristics and physicians' practice setting are associated with this use. The role of patients' psychosocial characteristics has however been understudied. The objectives were to study oncologists' intention to recommend chemotherapy or therapeutic abstention in an EOL patient's case and to examine the factors associated with this decision.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A clinical vignette-based questionnaire survey was conducted. While the case presented to the participating oncologists of a patient with EGFR-mutated lung cancer, progressing after osimertinib, ECOG 3, with leptomeningeal disease (N = 146), was strictly equivalent in terms of medical aspects and age, 4 patients' non-medical characteristics were manipulated: gender, marital status, parenthood, and psychosocial characteristics (\"nice\" patients, patients \"making strong demands,\" or control patients).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>77.4% of the oncologists surveyed stated that they would recommend chemotherapy in this situation. Only scenarios with nice patients or patients making strong demands were associated with less recommendation of chemotherapy (70.8% for the nice/making strong demands scenarios together vs 87.7%, for the control scenario P = .017). Medical oncologists with previous experience of similar cases were also less keen to recommend chemotherapy (73% vs 100%, P = .007). Of the 76.7% of respondents declaring that they would think of other therapeutic options, 49.1% mentioned \"other treatments\" without mentioning palliative care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Developing physicians' awareness of the psychosocial aspects at stake in their medical decisions in these sensitive situations may improve EOL care.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyae317","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While the use of chemotherapy near the end of life (EOL) has been identified as a relevant criterion for assessing quality of cancer care and has been estimated as non-beneficial, a trend of aggressiveness in cancer care during the last period of life remains. Both patients' sociodemographic characteristics and physicians' practice setting are associated with this use. The role of patients' psychosocial characteristics has however been understudied. The objectives were to study oncologists' intention to recommend chemotherapy or therapeutic abstention in an EOL patient's case and to examine the factors associated with this decision.

Methods: A clinical vignette-based questionnaire survey was conducted. While the case presented to the participating oncologists of a patient with EGFR-mutated lung cancer, progressing after osimertinib, ECOG 3, with leptomeningeal disease (N = 146), was strictly equivalent in terms of medical aspects and age, 4 patients' non-medical characteristics were manipulated: gender, marital status, parenthood, and psychosocial characteristics ("nice" patients, patients "making strong demands," or control patients).

Results: 77.4% of the oncologists surveyed stated that they would recommend chemotherapy in this situation. Only scenarios with nice patients or patients making strong demands were associated with less recommendation of chemotherapy (70.8% for the nice/making strong demands scenarios together vs 87.7%, for the control scenario P = .017). Medical oncologists with previous experience of similar cases were also less keen to recommend chemotherapy (73% vs 100%, P = .007). Of the 76.7% of respondents declaring that they would think of other therapeutic options, 49.1% mentioned "other treatments" without mentioning palliative care.

Conclusion: Developing physicians' awareness of the psychosocial aspects at stake in their medical decisions in these sensitive situations may improve EOL care.

患者的心理社会属性和癌症治疗在生命末期的侵略性。
背景:虽然在生命末期(EOL)使用化疗已被确定为评估癌症治疗质量的相关标准,并被估计为无益处,但在生命的最后阶段,癌症治疗的侵袭性趋势仍然存在。患者的社会人口学特征和医生的实践环境都与这种使用有关。然而,患者心理社会特征的作用尚未得到充分研究。目的是研究肿瘤学家在EOL患者病例中推荐化疗或放弃治疗的意图,并检查与此决定相关的因素。方法:采用临床小视频问卷调查。向参与的肿瘤学家提交的病例是一名egfr突变的肺癌患者,在服用奥西替尼后进展,ECOG 3,伴有轻脑膜疾病(N = 146),在医学方面和年龄方面严格相同,4名患者的非医学特征被操纵:性别,婚姻状况,父母身份和社会心理特征(“好”患者,“强烈要求”患者或对照患者)。结果:77.4%的受访肿瘤医师表示在这种情况下会推荐化疗。只有友善患者或强烈要求患者的情景与较少推荐化疗相关(友善/强烈要求情景为70.8%,对照情景为87.7%,P = 0.017)。有类似病例经验的内科肿瘤学家也不太热衷于推荐化疗(73% vs 100%, P = 0.007)。在表示会考虑其他治疗方案的76.7%受访者中,49.1%提及“其他治疗”,但没有提及姑息治疗。结论:在这些敏感的情况下,发展医生对他们的医疗决策所涉及的社会心理方面的意识可能会改善EOL护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncologist
Oncologist 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信