Patient-reported outcomes and measures are under-utilised in advanced therapy medicinal products trials for orphan conditions.

IF 7.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Andrada Ciuca, Siddharth Banka, Tara Clancy, Simon Jones, Jamie J Kirkham, William G Newman, Katherine Payne, Ramona Moldovan
{"title":"Patient-reported outcomes and measures are under-utilised in advanced therapy medicinal products trials for orphan conditions.","authors":"Andrada Ciuca, Siddharth Banka, Tara Clancy, Simon Jones, Jamie J Kirkham, William G Newman, Katherine Payne, Ramona Moldovan","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) are medicines based on genes, tissues or cells and can include gene therapy, somatic-cell therapy, and tissue-engineered medicines. Patient reported outcomes (PRO) are reports on health and wellbeing that come directly from the individual without external interpretation. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are questionnaires aimed at assessing the individual and subjective experience with health and other psychosocial aspects. The aim of the present review is to assess the extent and quality of PROs and PROMs used in orphan ATMPs trials.</p><p><strong>Study design and setting: </strong>The database from NHS Special Pharmacy Service Horizon scanning was searched on 27 March 2024 to identify all ATMPs for orphan conditions. Clinical trial protocols were included in this review if they investigated ATMPs for orphan conditions and were published in clinical trial databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 100 trials were included. These accounted for 64 conditions. Only 37% (37/100) of the trials included PROs. Overall, 17 different types of PROs were identified across the trials. QoL and HRQoL were the most frequent PROs found in 18% (18/100), respectively 13% (13/100) of the trials. A total of 33 PROMs were identified. Of these, 57% (19/33) were HRQoL 89% (17/19) or QoL 11% (2/19) measures. Of the HRQoL measures identified, 71% (12/17) were disease specific, and 29% (5/17) were generic. Of the non-QoL PROMs, 29% (4/14) were designed to measure pain and 71% (10/14) PROMs focused on other psychological outcomes, including anxiety and depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results show that only 37% of the orphan ATMPs trials include patient-reported outcomes and measures. This highlights the urgent need for relevant PROs/PROMs that capture benefits and harms and assimilation of existing PROMs for better comparison between or within conditions. It is essential to include and reflect the patients' experience so that those intended to benefit from the research have the opportunity to influence its direction.</p>","PeriodicalId":51079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"111617"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111617","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) are medicines based on genes, tissues or cells and can include gene therapy, somatic-cell therapy, and tissue-engineered medicines. Patient reported outcomes (PRO) are reports on health and wellbeing that come directly from the individual without external interpretation. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are questionnaires aimed at assessing the individual and subjective experience with health and other psychosocial aspects. The aim of the present review is to assess the extent and quality of PROs and PROMs used in orphan ATMPs trials.

Study design and setting: The database from NHS Special Pharmacy Service Horizon scanning was searched on 27 March 2024 to identify all ATMPs for orphan conditions. Clinical trial protocols were included in this review if they investigated ATMPs for orphan conditions and were published in clinical trial databases.

Results: A total of 100 trials were included. These accounted for 64 conditions. Only 37% (37/100) of the trials included PROs. Overall, 17 different types of PROs were identified across the trials. QoL and HRQoL were the most frequent PROs found in 18% (18/100), respectively 13% (13/100) of the trials. A total of 33 PROMs were identified. Of these, 57% (19/33) were HRQoL 89% (17/19) or QoL 11% (2/19) measures. Of the HRQoL measures identified, 71% (12/17) were disease specific, and 29% (5/17) were generic. Of the non-QoL PROMs, 29% (4/14) were designed to measure pain and 71% (10/14) PROMs focused on other psychological outcomes, including anxiety and depression.

Conclusion: Our results show that only 37% of the orphan ATMPs trials include patient-reported outcomes and measures. This highlights the urgent need for relevant PROs/PROMs that capture benefits and harms and assimilation of existing PROMs for better comparison between or within conditions. It is essential to include and reflect the patients' experience so that those intended to benefit from the research have the opportunity to influence its direction.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
320
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Epidemiology strives to enhance the quality of clinical and patient-oriented healthcare research by advancing and applying innovative methods in conducting, presenting, synthesizing, disseminating, and translating research results into optimal clinical practice. Special emphasis is placed on training new generations of scientists and clinical practice leaders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信