Exploration of What Pediatric Residents Find Most Helpful from Their Programs in Facilitating Well-Being.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Nimisha Bajaj, Suzanne M Reed, Ross E Myers, John D Mahan, Keith Ponitz
{"title":"Exploration of What Pediatric Residents Find Most Helpful from Their Programs in Facilitating Well-Being.","authors":"Nimisha Bajaj, Suzanne M Reed, Ross E Myers, John D Mahan, Keith Ponitz","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2024.102607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Burnout is highly prevalent among residents, and although many studied interventions have targeted burnout by trying to promote well-being, it remains a substantial problem. This study utilized data from the Pediatric Resident Burnout-Resilience Study Consortium (PRB-RSC) Annual Burnout Survey to determine which program interventions categorical and non-categorical (medicine-pediatrics and combined programs) pediatric residents found most helpful to promote well-being.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of an open-ended question on the PRB-RSC Annual Burnout Survey in 2019 and 2020: \"What is the most helpful thing that your program provides you for wellness?\" We performed thematic and content analysis on open-ended responses and compared distribution of themes and subthemes between years using a Chi-squared test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2019, 1401 (44%) of 3159 residents from 44 programs responded to the open-ended question, with 771 (49%) of 1563 residents from 21 programs responding in 2020. Residents found wellness interventions within five themes to be the most helpful. Promotes Positive Work Environment and Optimizes Scheduling were mentioned most frequently, but residents also valued when a program Facilitates Traditional Wellness Interventions, Offers Financial Benefits, and Prioritizes Education. Themes and subthemes were mentioned with the same frequency in both 2019 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study show which institutional interventions residents have found to be most helpful to their well-being. Program leaders can use this data as a framework to discuss interventions with their residents, allowing them to tailor wellness programs and use limited available resources for what residents believe is most impactful.</p>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"102607"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2024.102607","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Burnout is highly prevalent among residents, and although many studied interventions have targeted burnout by trying to promote well-being, it remains a substantial problem. This study utilized data from the Pediatric Resident Burnout-Resilience Study Consortium (PRB-RSC) Annual Burnout Survey to determine which program interventions categorical and non-categorical (medicine-pediatrics and combined programs) pediatric residents found most helpful to promote well-being.

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of an open-ended question on the PRB-RSC Annual Burnout Survey in 2019 and 2020: "What is the most helpful thing that your program provides you for wellness?" We performed thematic and content analysis on open-ended responses and compared distribution of themes and subthemes between years using a Chi-squared test.

Results: In 2019, 1401 (44%) of 3159 residents from 44 programs responded to the open-ended question, with 771 (49%) of 1563 residents from 21 programs responding in 2020. Residents found wellness interventions within five themes to be the most helpful. Promotes Positive Work Environment and Optimizes Scheduling were mentioned most frequently, but residents also valued when a program Facilitates Traditional Wellness Interventions, Offers Financial Benefits, and Prioritizes Education. Themes and subthemes were mentioned with the same frequency in both 2019 and 2020.

Conclusions: The results of this study show which institutional interventions residents have found to be most helpful to their well-being. Program leaders can use this data as a framework to discuss interventions with their residents, allowing them to tailor wellness programs and use limited available resources for what residents believe is most impactful.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Pediatrics
Academic Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.90%
发文量
300
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信