Potential interactions between direct oral anticoagulants and atorvastatin/simvastatin: a cohort and case-crossover study.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Angel Ys Wong, Charlotte Warren-Gash, Krishnan Bhaskaran, Clémence Leyrat, Amitava Banerjee, Liam Smeeth, Ian J Douglas
{"title":"Potential interactions between direct oral anticoagulants and atorvastatin/simvastatin: a cohort and case-crossover study.","authors":"Angel Ys Wong, Charlotte Warren-Gash, Krishnan Bhaskaran, Clémence Leyrat, Amitava Banerjee, Liam Smeeth, Ian J Douglas","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are commonly co-prescribed with statins. Although biologically plausible, whether there is a drug interaction between DOACs and atorvastatin/simvastatin is unclear.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the association between co-prescribed DOACs and atorvastatin/simvastatin and bleeding, cardiovascular disease, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Cohort and case-crossover study using data from English general practices in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2019.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cohort design was used to estimate hazard ratios for clinically relevant pharmacological interaction safety outcomes (intracranial bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, and other bleeding) comparing DOACs and atorvastatin/simvastatin with DOACs and other statins (fluvastatin, pravastatin, and rosuvastatin that are not anticipated to interact with DOACs). Effectiveness outcomes (ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, venous thromboembolism, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality) were also included. In addition, a case-crossover design was used to compare the odds of exposure to different drug initiation patterns in the hazard window versus the referent window within an individual.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 397 459 patients who were prescribed DOACs, 70 318 people co-prescribed atorvastatin and 38 724 co-prescribed simvastatin were selected. The cohort analysis showed no difference in risk of all outcomes comparing patients prescribed DOACs and atorvastatin/simvastatin versus those prescribed DOACs and other statins. In the case-crossover analysis, odds ratios (ORs) for other bleeding (OR 5.06, 99% confidence interval [CI] = 3.79 to 6.76) among those initiating DOACs while taking atorvastatin and the ORs for gastrointestinal bleeding (OR 6.05, 99% CI = 4.28 to 8.54) and other bleeding (OR 6.81, 99% CI = 4.74 to 9.78) among those initiating DOACs while taking simvastatin were greater than those initiating DOAC monotherapy. Similar patterns were also observed for cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows no evidence of interaction between DOACs and atorvastatin/simvastatin. However, people starting a DOAC while taking atorvastatin/simvastatin were at high risk of bleeding and mortality, likely because of temporal clinical vulnerability.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12117505/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0349","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are commonly co-prescribed with statins. Although biologically plausible, whether there is a drug interaction between DOACs and atorvastatin/simvastatin is unclear.

Aim: To investigate the association between co-prescribed DOACs and atorvastatin/simvastatin and bleeding, cardiovascular disease, and mortality.

Design and setting: Cohort and case-crossover study using data from English general practices in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2019.

Method: A cohort design was used to estimate hazard ratios for clinically relevant pharmacological interaction safety outcomes (intracranial bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, and other bleeding) comparing DOACs and atorvastatin/simvastatin with DOACs and other statins (fluvastatin, pravastatin, and rosuvastatin that are not anticipated to interact with DOACs). Effectiveness outcomes (ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, venous thromboembolism, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality) were also included. In addition, a case-crossover design was used to compare the odds of exposure to different drug initiation patterns in the hazard window versus the referent window within an individual.

Results: Of 397 459 patients who were prescribed DOACs, 70 318 people co-prescribed atorvastatin and 38 724 co-prescribed simvastatin were selected. The cohort analysis showed no difference in risk of all outcomes comparing patients prescribed DOACs and atorvastatin/simvastatin versus those prescribed DOACs and other statins. In the case-crossover analysis, odds ratios (ORs) for other bleeding (OR 5.06, 99% confidence interval [CI] = 3.79 to 6.76) among those initiating DOACs while taking atorvastatin and the ORs for gastrointestinal bleeding (OR 6.05, 99% CI = 4.28 to 8.54) and other bleeding (OR 6.81, 99% CI = 4.74 to 9.78) among those initiating DOACs while taking simvastatin were greater than those initiating DOAC monotherapy. Similar patterns were also observed for cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality.

Conclusion: This study shows no evidence of interaction between DOACs and atorvastatin/simvastatin. However, people starting a DOAC while taking atorvastatin/simvastatin were at high risk of bleeding and mortality, likely because of temporal clinical vulnerability.

直接口服抗凝剂与阿托伐他汀/辛伐他汀之间的潜在相互作用:队列和病例交叉研究。
背景:直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)通常与他汀类药物合用。虽然从生物学上讲是合理的,但DOACs与阿托伐他汀/辛伐他汀之间是否存在药物相互作用尚不清楚。目的:探讨DOACs联合阿托伐他汀/辛伐他汀与出血、心血管疾病和死亡率的关系。设计与设置:临床实践研究数据链Aurum(2011年1月1日- 2019年12月31日)。方法:我们采用队列设计来评估DOACs+阿托伐他汀/辛伐他汀与DOACs+其他他汀类药物(氟伐他汀、普伐他汀和瑞舒伐他汀,这些药物预计不会与DOACs发生相互作用)的临床相关药物相互作用安全性结局(颅内出血、胃肠道出血、其他出血)的风险比。有效性结果(缺血性卒中、心肌梗死、静脉血栓栓塞、心血管死亡率和全因死亡率)也包括在内。还进行了病例交叉设计,比较个体在危险窗口和参考窗口中暴露于不同药物起始模式的几率。结果:在397,459名DOAC使用者中,我们选择了70,318人共同服用阿托伐他汀,38,724人共同服用辛伐他汀。队列分析显示,DOACs+阿托伐他汀/辛伐他汀与DOACs+其他他汀类药物相比,所有结局的风险均无差异。在病例交叉分析中,其他出血的OR (OR:4.04;99%CI:3.07-5.31)和胃肠道出血的OR (OR:5.16;99%CI:3.66-7.28)和其他出血(OR:5.12;99%CI:3.61-7.26),同时服用辛伐他汀的DOAC患者比单药DOAC患者的发生率高。心血管死亡率和全因死亡率也观察到类似的模式。结论:本研究显示DOACs与阿托伐他汀/辛伐他汀之间没有相互作用的证据。然而,在服用阿托伐他汀/辛伐他汀的同时开始DOAC的人,出血和死亡的风险很高,可能是由于暂时的临床脆弱性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信