Evaluation of the analgesic efficacy of a low dose of intrathecal morphine in laparoscopic abdominal surgery: A randomised control trial.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Lakshmi Kumar, Ramya Anantharaman, Dimple Elina Thomas, Anjaly S Nair, Anandajith P Kartha, Karthik Kumar
{"title":"Evaluation of the analgesic efficacy of a low dose of intrathecal morphine in laparoscopic abdominal surgery: A randomised control trial.","authors":"Lakshmi Kumar, Ramya Anantharaman, Dimple Elina Thomas, Anjaly S Nair, Anandajith P Kartha, Karthik Kumar","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_141_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intrathecal opioid is an analgesic option in laparoscopic surgery. We assessed primarily the intraoperative opioid requirement amongst patients receiving intrathecal morphine (ITM) (Group M) versus standard care (Group C) for abdominal surgery. The secondary outcomes were intraoperative haemodynamic changes, extubation on table and pain scores in the intensive care unit (ICU) at 6 th hourly intervals for 24 h postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery were randomised into Group M ( n = 30) that received ITM at 2 μg/kg while Group C ( n = 30) was control. A rise in mean arterial pressure > 20% from baseline was treated sequentially with 0.3 mg /kg propofol and 0.5 μg/kg fentanyl intravenously (IV). Pain management in the ICU included paracetamol 1G IV 8 th hourly for all patients, while nefopam 20 mg and fentanyl 0.5 μg/kg IV were the second and third tiers of pain management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraoperatively, 10 patients in Group M versus 26 in Group C needed additional fentanyl ( P < 0.001) and 15 versus 26 patients needed additional propofol ( P = 0.0024). Pain scores were superior in Group M at all time points in the ICU and at ambulation and during incentive spirometry. Thirteen patients in Group C versus 3 in Group M needed nefopam at the time of shifting to the ICU ( P = 0.004) and 10 patients versus 1 at 8 h in the ICU ( P = 0.003) while pain management at 16 h and 24 h was comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pre-operative ITM at 2 μg/kg reduces intraoperative opioid requirement and improves analgesia 24 h postoperatively amongst patients undergoing major laparoscopic abdominal surgery without delay in extubation or changes in haemodynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_141_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Intrathecal opioid is an analgesic option in laparoscopic surgery. We assessed primarily the intraoperative opioid requirement amongst patients receiving intrathecal morphine (ITM) (Group M) versus standard care (Group C) for abdominal surgery. The secondary outcomes were intraoperative haemodynamic changes, extubation on table and pain scores in the intensive care unit (ICU) at 6 th hourly intervals for 24 h postoperatively.

Patients and methods: Patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery were randomised into Group M ( n = 30) that received ITM at 2 μg/kg while Group C ( n = 30) was control. A rise in mean arterial pressure > 20% from baseline was treated sequentially with 0.3 mg /kg propofol and 0.5 μg/kg fentanyl intravenously (IV). Pain management in the ICU included paracetamol 1G IV 8 th hourly for all patients, while nefopam 20 mg and fentanyl 0.5 μg/kg IV were the second and third tiers of pain management.

Results: Intraoperatively, 10 patients in Group M versus 26 in Group C needed additional fentanyl ( P < 0.001) and 15 versus 26 patients needed additional propofol ( P = 0.0024). Pain scores were superior in Group M at all time points in the ICU and at ambulation and during incentive spirometry. Thirteen patients in Group C versus 3 in Group M needed nefopam at the time of shifting to the ICU ( P = 0.004) and 10 patients versus 1 at 8 h in the ICU ( P = 0.003) while pain management at 16 h and 24 h was comparable.

Conclusion: Pre-operative ITM at 2 μg/kg reduces intraoperative opioid requirement and improves analgesia 24 h postoperatively amongst patients undergoing major laparoscopic abdominal surgery without delay in extubation or changes in haemodynamics.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Minimal Access Surgery (JMAS), the official publication of Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endo Surgeons, launched in early 2005. The JMAS, a quarterly publication, is the first English-language journal from India, as also from this part of the world, dedicated to Minimal Access Surgery. The JMAS boasts an outstanding editorial board comprising of Indian and international experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信