Growing practices and the use of potentially harmful chemical additives from a web survey of mainly small-scale cannabis growers in 18 countries.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Simon Lenton, Gary Potter, Davide Fortin, Ashely Granville, Jodie Grigg, Eric Sevigny, Chris Wilkins, Tom Decorte, Monica Barratt
{"title":"Growing practices and the use of potentially harmful chemical additives from a web survey of mainly small-scale cannabis growers in 18 countries.","authors":"Simon Lenton, Gary Potter, Davide Fortin, Ashely Granville, Jodie Grigg, Eric Sevigny, Chris Wilkins, Tom Decorte, Monica Barratt","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is emerging recognition of the risks of harmful chemical pesticides, fertilizers and 'nutrients' by cannabis growers. One group of chemicals, Plant Growth Regulators (PGRs), many of which have been banned from food crops for decades, have been found unlisted in a number of fertilizers and supplements marketed at cannabis growers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This paper predominately uses data from a 2020-21 convenience web survey of mainly small-scale, recent (last 5yrs) cannabis growers from 18 countries (n = 11,479). We describe their growing practices and use of chemicals and employ logistic regression to explore predictors of chemical use. We also compare chemical use in our 2020-21 sample with that from our 2012-13 data in the 3 countries (Australia, Denmark, UK) where respondents were asked about their use of growing chemicals in both surveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2020-21, 26 % of recent cannabis growers reported use of chemicals. Growers who were at highest odds of using chemicals were male, older, living in urban/cities, not growing for environmental reasons, growing in order to sell, growing where they believed cannabis was legal, and growing under artificial light in soil or non-soil media. We found significant reductions in the proportions of our samples who reported using chemical fertilizers in the 3 countries where we collected data in both waves.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Growers using soil and artificial light comprised over half of all the chemical users in the sample. Efforts at informing and educating growers about the problems of chemical fertilizer, nutrient and pesticide use should include all growers including those who grow in soil under artificial light. Possible explanations for the apparent decrease in chemical use from our 2012-13 to 2020-21 samples are discussed. Stricter regulation of the legal cannabis fertilizer market is required to empower growers to reduce the toxicity of cannabis they grow, distribute and consume.</p>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":" ","pages":"104662"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104662","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is emerging recognition of the risks of harmful chemical pesticides, fertilizers and 'nutrients' by cannabis growers. One group of chemicals, Plant Growth Regulators (PGRs), many of which have been banned from food crops for decades, have been found unlisted in a number of fertilizers and supplements marketed at cannabis growers.

Methods: This paper predominately uses data from a 2020-21 convenience web survey of mainly small-scale, recent (last 5yrs) cannabis growers from 18 countries (n = 11,479). We describe their growing practices and use of chemicals and employ logistic regression to explore predictors of chemical use. We also compare chemical use in our 2020-21 sample with that from our 2012-13 data in the 3 countries (Australia, Denmark, UK) where respondents were asked about their use of growing chemicals in both surveys.

Results: In 2020-21, 26 % of recent cannabis growers reported use of chemicals. Growers who were at highest odds of using chemicals were male, older, living in urban/cities, not growing for environmental reasons, growing in order to sell, growing where they believed cannabis was legal, and growing under artificial light in soil or non-soil media. We found significant reductions in the proportions of our samples who reported using chemical fertilizers in the 3 countries where we collected data in both waves.

Conclusion: Growers using soil and artificial light comprised over half of all the chemical users in the sample. Efforts at informing and educating growers about the problems of chemical fertilizer, nutrient and pesticide use should include all growers including those who grow in soil under artificial light. Possible explanations for the apparent decrease in chemical use from our 2012-13 to 2020-21 samples are discussed. Stricter regulation of the legal cannabis fertilizer market is required to empower growers to reduce the toxicity of cannabis they grow, distribute and consume.

对18个国家主要是小规模大麻种植者进行的网络调查得出的种植做法和潜在有害化学添加剂的使用。
背景:大麻种植者逐渐认识到有害化学农药、化肥和“营养物”的风险。一组化学物质,植物生长调节剂(pgr),其中许多已经被禁止在粮食作物中使用几十年了,但在大麻种植者销售的许多肥料和补充剂中却没有列出。方法:本文主要使用来自2020-21年便利网络调查的数据,主要是来自18个国家的小规模近期(过去5年)大麻种植者(n = 11,479)。我们描述了他们日益增长的实践和化学品的使用,并采用逻辑回归来探索化学品使用的预测因素。我们还将2020-21年样本中的化学品使用情况与2012-13年三个国家(澳大利亚、丹麦、英国)的数据进行了比较,在这两个调查中,受访者都被问及他们对种植化学品的使用情况。结果:在2020- 2021年,26%的大麻种植者报告使用化学品。使用化学药品的比例最高的种植者是男性,年龄较大,居住在城市/城市,不出于环境原因种植,为了销售而种植,在他们认为大麻合法的地方种植,在人工光下在土壤或非土壤介质中种植。我们发现,在我们收集两波数据的三个国家中,报告使用化肥的样本比例显著减少。结论:使用土壤和人造光的种植者占样本中所有化学品使用者的一半以上。所有的种植者,包括那些在人工光照下种植的种植者,都应该对他们进行有关化肥、营养物和农药使用问题的宣传和教育。对2012-13年至2020-21年样品中化学品使用明显减少的可能解释进行了讨论。需要对合法的大麻肥料市场进行更严格的监管,以使种植者能够减少他们种植、分销和消费的大麻的毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信