Gender disparity in morbidity and mortality among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction due to spontaneous coronary artery dissection complicated by cardiogenic shock.

IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Magdi Zordok, Mohamad Etiwy, Mohamed Abdelazeem, Sourbha S Dani, Mariam Tawadros, Hady T Lichaa, Jimmy L Kerrigan, Babar Basir, Khaldoon Alaswad, Michael Miedema, Emmanouil S Brilakis, Michael Megaly
{"title":"Gender disparity in morbidity and mortality among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction due to spontaneous coronary artery dissection complicated by cardiogenic shock.","authors":"Magdi Zordok, Mohamad Etiwy, Mohamed Abdelazeem, Sourbha S Dani, Mariam Tawadros, Hady T Lichaa, Jimmy L Kerrigan, Babar Basir, Khaldoon Alaswad, Michael Miedema, Emmanouil S Brilakis, Michael Megaly","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.11.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is limited data on gender differences among patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) who present as ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and develop cardiogenic shock (CS).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe outcomes of SCAD patients presenting with STEMI and CS and outline the differences between men and women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We queried the US Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) from January 2016 to December 2020 to identify patients with SCAD presenting with STEMI who developed CS. We compared the characteristics, trends, and outcomes between men and women in this cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 582,633 hospitalizations with STEMI, 0.2 % (1176 patients) had SCAD, of which 346 (29.4 %) had CS. There was no difference in median age between men and women (64 years (IQR 57-71) vs. 63 years (IQR 49-72), p = 0.181). Men had a higher prevalence of prior myocardial infarction (MI) (14.2 % vs. 6.2 %, p = 0.021). The overall mortality rate of SCAD patients with AMI-CS was 28.2 %, with no difference between men and women. Patients with SCAD who had CS and underwent CABG had a mortality of 20.3 %. ECMO was used in 6.1 % of SCAD patients presenting with STEMI and CS, with a survival rate of 49.9 %.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were no differences in the baseline characteristics, rates of revascularization, or in-hospital mortality between men and women who had SCAD complicated by CS (SCAD-CS). Patients with SCAD-CS patients who underwent CABG had around 80 % in-hospital survival. CABG should be considered as a method of revascularization in this patient cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2024.11.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is limited data on gender differences among patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) who present as ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and develop cardiogenic shock (CS).

Objectives: To describe outcomes of SCAD patients presenting with STEMI and CS and outline the differences between men and women.

Methods: We queried the US Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) from January 2016 to December 2020 to identify patients with SCAD presenting with STEMI who developed CS. We compared the characteristics, trends, and outcomes between men and women in this cohort.

Results: Out of 582,633 hospitalizations with STEMI, 0.2 % (1176 patients) had SCAD, of which 346 (29.4 %) had CS. There was no difference in median age between men and women (64 years (IQR 57-71) vs. 63 years (IQR 49-72), p = 0.181). Men had a higher prevalence of prior myocardial infarction (MI) (14.2 % vs. 6.2 %, p = 0.021). The overall mortality rate of SCAD patients with AMI-CS was 28.2 %, with no difference between men and women. Patients with SCAD who had CS and underwent CABG had a mortality of 20.3 %. ECMO was used in 6.1 % of SCAD patients presenting with STEMI and CS, with a survival rate of 49.9 %.

Conclusion: There were no differences in the baseline characteristics, rates of revascularization, or in-hospital mortality between men and women who had SCAD complicated by CS (SCAD-CS). Patients with SCAD-CS patients who underwent CABG had around 80 % in-hospital survival. CABG should be considered as a method of revascularization in this patient cohort.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
687
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine (CRM) is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to revascularization therapies in cardiovascular medicine. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine publishes articles related to preclinical work and molecular interventions, including angiogenesis, cell therapy, pharmacological interventions, restenosis management, and prevention, including experiments conducted in human subjects, in laboratory animals, and in vitro. Specific areas of interest include percutaneous angioplasty in coronary and peripheral arteries, intervention in structural heart disease, cardiovascular surgery, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信