Measurement Properties of the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis-Based Study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pediatric Anesthesia Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1111/pan.15046
Jenny Ringblom, Ingrid Wåhlin, Marie Proczkowska, Laura Korhonen, Kristofer Årestedt
{"title":"Measurement Properties of the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis-Based Study.","authors":"Jenny Ringblom, Ingrid Wåhlin, Marie Proczkowska, Laura Korhonen, Kristofer Årestedt","doi":"10.1111/pan.15046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergence delirium is a well-known and common problem in children recovering from anesthesia. The five-item Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium scale is one of the most commonly used instruments for assessing this condition, but the scale has been questioned regarding its latent structure, i.e., whether its items cover just one underlying construct. It has been suggested that the scale's first three items might identify emergence delirium better than the last two.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the measurement properties of the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium scale with a focus on its latent structure and cutoff scores, using appropriate statistical methods for ordinal data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 350 children under 7 years of age, undergoing adenoidectomy, with or without additional tonsillotomy or minor procedures like paracentesis, tongue-tie release, or cerumen removal, were enrolled in the study. At the recovery unit, emergence delirium and pain were registered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated that the two-factor model, including emergence delirium-specific behaviors (first three items) and emergence delirium-nonspecific behaviors (last two items), established an excellent model fit according to the χ<sup>2</sup> goodness-of-fit statistics, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation, Comparative Fit Index, Tucker-Lewis Index, and Standardized Root Mean Square Residual. The ordinal alpha of 0.98 and the ordinal omega of 0.96 supported the internal consistency reliability of the emergence delirium-specific behaviors. The convergent validity was supported due to a strong correlation between emergence delirium-nonspecific behaviors and the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability scale. The receiver-operating characteristic curve analyses resulted in two tentative cutoff scores for emergence delirium-specific behaviors¸ ≥ 6 and ≥ 8.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium scale's first three items are a more valid and reliable measure of emergence delirium than its original five items.</p>","PeriodicalId":19745,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":"155-162"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.15046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emergence delirium is a well-known and common problem in children recovering from anesthesia. The five-item Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium scale is one of the most commonly used instruments for assessing this condition, but the scale has been questioned regarding its latent structure, i.e., whether its items cover just one underlying construct. It has been suggested that the scale's first three items might identify emergence delirium better than the last two.

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the measurement properties of the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium scale with a focus on its latent structure and cutoff scores, using appropriate statistical methods for ordinal data.

Methods: A total of 350 children under 7 years of age, undergoing adenoidectomy, with or without additional tonsillotomy or minor procedures like paracentesis, tongue-tie release, or cerumen removal, were enrolled in the study. At the recovery unit, emergence delirium and pain were registered.

Results: The confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated that the two-factor model, including emergence delirium-specific behaviors (first three items) and emergence delirium-nonspecific behaviors (last two items), established an excellent model fit according to the χ2 goodness-of-fit statistics, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation, Comparative Fit Index, Tucker-Lewis Index, and Standardized Root Mean Square Residual. The ordinal alpha of 0.98 and the ordinal omega of 0.96 supported the internal consistency reliability of the emergence delirium-specific behaviors. The convergent validity was supported due to a strong correlation between emergence delirium-nonspecific behaviors and the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability scale. The receiver-operating characteristic curve analyses resulted in two tentative cutoff scores for emergence delirium-specific behaviors¸ ≥ 6 and ≥ 8.

Conclusion: The Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium scale's first three items are a more valid and reliable measure of emergence delirium than its original five items.

小儿麻醉出现性谵妄量表的测量特性:一项基于验证性因素分析的研究。
背景:出现性谵妄是小儿麻醉后恢复的常见问题。五项儿科麻醉突发谵妄量表是评估这种情况最常用的工具之一,但该量表的潜在结构一直受到质疑,即其项目是否只涵盖一个潜在结构。有人认为,量表的前三个项目可能比后两个项目更能识别突发性谵妄。目的:本研究的目的是评估小儿麻醉出现性谵妄量表的测量特性,重点是其潜在结构和截止分数,采用适当的统计方法对有序数据进行统计。方法:共有350名7岁以下的儿童,接受腺样体切除术,有或没有额外的扁桃体切除术或小手术,如穿刺、舌结松解或耵聍去除,被纳入研究。在恢复病房,记录了紧急谵妄和疼痛。结果:验证性因子分析表明,经χ2拟合优度统计、近似均方根误差、比较拟合指数、Tucker-Lewis指数和标准化均方根残差分析,包括紧急谵妄特异性行为(前3项)和紧急谵妄非特异性行为(后2项)的双因素模型具有良好的模型拟合性。α的序数为0.98,ω的序数为0.96,支持出现谵妄特异性行为的内部一致性信度。由于出现性谵妄-非特异性行为与脸、腿、活动、哭泣和安慰量表之间存在很强的相关性,因此支持收敛效度。接受者-工作特征曲线分析得出紧急谵妄特定行为的两个暂定临界值≥6和≥8。结论:小儿麻醉紧急谵妄量表前3个项目比原5个项目更能有效可靠地衡量紧急谵妄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Anesthesia
Pediatric Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Devoted to the dissemination of research of interest and importance to practising anesthetists everywhere, the scientific and clinical content of Pediatric Anesthesia covers a wide selection of medical disciplines in all areas relevant to paediatric anaesthesia, pain management and peri-operative medicine. The International Editorial Board is supported by the Editorial Advisory Board and a team of Senior Advisors, to ensure that the journal is publishing the best work from the front line of research in the field. The journal publishes high-quality, relevant scientific and clinical research papers, reviews, commentaries, pro-con debates, historical vignettes, correspondence, case presentations and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信