Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Versus Quadriceps Tendon-Bone Autografts in Anatomic Rectangular Tunnel Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-27 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671241297104
Kazunori Shimomura, Akira Tsujii, Ayaka Tanaka, Masayuki Hamada, Yasukazu Yonetani
{"title":"Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Versus Quadriceps Tendon-Bone Autografts in Anatomic Rectangular Tunnel Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.","authors":"Kazunori Shimomura, Akira Tsujii, Ayaka Tanaka, Masayuki Hamada, Yasukazu Yonetani","doi":"10.1177/23259671241297104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anatomic rectangular tunnel anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ART-ACLR) can mimic the fiber arrangement of the native ACL and restore normal knee biomechanics, compared with the conventional round tunnel ACLR. ART-ACLR using a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) graft can provide satisfactory clinical outcomes; however, some issues such as secondary ACL injury and donor-site morbidity, including postoperative anterior knee pain (AKP), remain to be solved. Due to these issues, quadriceps tendon-bone (QTB) grafts have recently become more popular.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the 2-year clinical outcomes of ART-ACLR with BPTB and QTB autografts.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 134 patients underwent primary ART-ACLR with BPTB (n = 70) or QTB (n = 64). All patients had a minimum follow-up period of 2 years postoperatively. Outcome evaluations included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), side-to-side differences (SSDs) with the KT-1000 knee arthrometer, rate of secondary ACL injury, and incidence of AKP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regarding age, sex, height, weight,and concomitant procedures, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups. All clinical scores significantly improved from preoperatively to 6 months postoperatively and further increased throughout the 2-year postoperative period in both groups. The IKDC and all subscales of the KOOS, except Sport and Recreation, were equivalent between the BPTB and QTB groups at each postoperative time point. There were no significant differences in the SSD value of KT-1000 arthrometer between the 2 groups. The rates of secondary ACL injury were 10.0% on the ipsilateral side and 2.9% on the contralateral side in the BPTB group and 3.1% on the ipsilateral side and 4.7% on the contralateral side in the QTB group, with no significant difference between both groups. The incidence of AKP was 17.1% and 4.9% in the BPTB group and QTB group, respectively, with significance of <i>P</i> = .02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The clinical scores, SSD value of the KT-1000 arthrometer, and secondary ACL injury rates were equivalent between the BPTB and QTB groups. However, the incidence of AKP was significantly lower in the QTB group, suggesting that QTB could be a favorable graft for ACLR.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"12 11","pages":"23259671241297104"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11603535/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241297104","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anatomic rectangular tunnel anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ART-ACLR) can mimic the fiber arrangement of the native ACL and restore normal knee biomechanics, compared with the conventional round tunnel ACLR. ART-ACLR using a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) graft can provide satisfactory clinical outcomes; however, some issues such as secondary ACL injury and donor-site morbidity, including postoperative anterior knee pain (AKP), remain to be solved. Due to these issues, quadriceps tendon-bone (QTB) grafts have recently become more popular.

Purpose: To compare the 2-year clinical outcomes of ART-ACLR with BPTB and QTB autografts.

Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: A total of 134 patients underwent primary ART-ACLR with BPTB (n = 70) or QTB (n = 64). All patients had a minimum follow-up period of 2 years postoperatively. Outcome evaluations included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), side-to-side differences (SSDs) with the KT-1000 knee arthrometer, rate of secondary ACL injury, and incidence of AKP.

Results: Regarding age, sex, height, weight,and concomitant procedures, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups. All clinical scores significantly improved from preoperatively to 6 months postoperatively and further increased throughout the 2-year postoperative period in both groups. The IKDC and all subscales of the KOOS, except Sport and Recreation, were equivalent between the BPTB and QTB groups at each postoperative time point. There were no significant differences in the SSD value of KT-1000 arthrometer between the 2 groups. The rates of secondary ACL injury were 10.0% on the ipsilateral side and 2.9% on the contralateral side in the BPTB group and 3.1% on the ipsilateral side and 4.7% on the contralateral side in the QTB group, with no significant difference between both groups. The incidence of AKP was 17.1% and 4.9% in the BPTB group and QTB group, respectively, with significance of P = .02).

Conclusion: The clinical scores, SSD value of the KT-1000 arthrometer, and secondary ACL injury rates were equivalent between the BPTB and QTB groups. However, the incidence of AKP was significantly lower in the QTB group, suggesting that QTB could be a favorable graft for ACLR.

骨-髌腱-骨与股四头肌肌腱-骨自体移植物在解剖矩形隧道前交叉韧带重建中的应用。
背景:解剖矩形隧道前交叉韧带重建(ART-ACLR)与传统圆形隧道前交叉韧带重建相比,可以模拟原始前交叉韧带的纤维排列并恢复正常的膝关节生物力学。ART-ACLR采用骨-髌腱-骨(BPTB)移植物可以提供满意的临床结果;然而,一些问题,如继发性前交叉韧带损伤和供体部位发病率,包括术后前膝关节疼痛(AKP),仍有待解决。由于这些问题,股四头肌肌腱-骨(QTB)移植最近变得越来越流行。目的:比较ART-ACLR与BPTB和QTB自体移植的2年临床效果。研究设计:队列研究;证据水平,3。方法:134例合并BPTB (n = 70)或QTB (n = 64)的患者接受原发性ART-ACLR治疗。所有患者术后随访时间至少为2年。结果评估包括国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(oos)、使用KT-1000膝关节计的侧对侧差异(ssd)、继发性前交叉韧带损伤率和AKP发生率。结果:两组患者在年龄、性别、身高、体重及相关手术方面差异无统计学意义。从术前到术后6个月,两组患者的临床评分均显著提高,并在术后2年期间进一步提高。术后各时间点,BPTB组和QTB组的IKDC和KOOS的所有亚量表(除运动和娱乐外)均相等。两组间KT-1000关节计的SSD值无显著差异。BPTB组继发性前交叉韧带损伤发生率为同侧10.0%、对侧2.9%,QTB组同侧3.1%、对侧4.7%,两组间差异无统计学意义。BPTB组和QTB组AKP发生率分别为17.1%和4.9%,差异有统计学意义(P = 0.02)。结论:BPTB组与QTB组的临床评分、KT-1000关节计的SSD值、继发性ACL损伤发生率相当。然而,QTB组的AKP发生率明显较低,提示QTB可能是ACLR的有利移植物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信