The Association between COVID-19 Status and Economic Costs in the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from a UK Symptom Surveillance Digital Survey.

IF 2 Q2 ECONOMICS
PharmacoEconomics Open Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1007/s41669-024-00544-0
Sung Wook Kim, Caterina Alacevich, Catia Nicodemo, Raphael Wittenberg, Simon de Lusignan, Stavros Petrou
{"title":"The Association between COVID-19 Status and Economic Costs in the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from a UK Symptom Surveillance Digital Survey.","authors":"Sung Wook Kim, Caterina Alacevich, Catia Nicodemo, Raphael Wittenberg, Simon de Lusignan, Stavros Petrou","doi":"10.1007/s41669-024-00544-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the absence of a vaccination programme, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had substantial impacts on population health and wellbeing and health care services. We explored the association between COVID-19 status, sociodemographic, socioeconomic and clinical factors and economic costs during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Data: </strong>The study used patient-reported digital survey and symptom surveillance data collected between July and December 2020, in collaboration with a primary care computerised medical record system supplier, EMIS Health, in the UK. The study included 11,534 participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Generalised linear models (GLM) and two-part regression models were used to estimate factors associated with economic costs (£sterling, 2022 prices) estimated from two perspectives: (i) a UK National Health Service (NHS) and personal social services (PSS) perspective and (ii) a societal perspective.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Experience of the onset of COVID-19 symptoms started more than 3 months ago was associated with significantly higher NHS and PSS costs (GLM: £319.8, two-part: £171.7) (p < 0.001) and societal costs (GLM: £776.9, two-part: £675.6) (p < 0.001) in both models. A positive test result within the previous 14 days was associated with significantly higher NHS and PSS costs (two-part: £389.1) (p < 0.05) and societal costs (GLM: £470.7, two-part: £439.2) (p < 0.01). Age between 31 and 55 years was associated with significantly higher societal costs than age between 16 and 30 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identifies and quantifies factors associated with the economic costs incurred during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK. The results of our study can inform cross-country comparisons and other cost comparisons.</p>","PeriodicalId":19770,"journal":{"name":"PharmacoEconomics Open","volume":" ","pages":"231-245"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11865407/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PharmacoEconomics Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-024-00544-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In the absence of a vaccination programme, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had substantial impacts on population health and wellbeing and health care services. We explored the association between COVID-19 status, sociodemographic, socioeconomic and clinical factors and economic costs during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Data: The study used patient-reported digital survey and symptom surveillance data collected between July and December 2020, in collaboration with a primary care computerised medical record system supplier, EMIS Health, in the UK. The study included 11,534 participants.

Methods: Generalised linear models (GLM) and two-part regression models were used to estimate factors associated with economic costs (£sterling, 2022 prices) estimated from two perspectives: (i) a UK National Health Service (NHS) and personal social services (PSS) perspective and (ii) a societal perspective.

Results: Experience of the onset of COVID-19 symptoms started more than 3 months ago was associated with significantly higher NHS and PSS costs (GLM: £319.8, two-part: £171.7) (p < 0.001) and societal costs (GLM: £776.9, two-part: £675.6) (p < 0.001) in both models. A positive test result within the previous 14 days was associated with significantly higher NHS and PSS costs (two-part: £389.1) (p < 0.05) and societal costs (GLM: £470.7, two-part: £439.2) (p < 0.01). Age between 31 and 55 years was associated with significantly higher societal costs than age between 16 and 30 years.

Conclusion: This study identifies and quantifies factors associated with the economic costs incurred during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK. The results of our study can inform cross-country comparisons and other cost comparisons.

COVID-19大流行早期阶段COVID-19状况与经济成本之间的关系:来自英国症状监测数字调查的证据
导言:在没有疫苗接种规划的情况下,2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行对人口健康和福祉以及卫生保健服务产生了重大影响。我们探讨了第二波COVID-19大流行期间COVID-19状况、社会人口统计学、社会经济和临床因素与经济成本之间的关系。数据:该研究使用了2020年7月至12月期间收集的患者报告的数字调查和症状监测数据,该数据是与英国初级保健计算机医疗记录系统供应商EMIS Health合作收集的。该研究包括11534名参与者。方法:使用广义线性模型(GLM)和两部分回归模型来估计与经济成本(英镑,2022年价格)相关的因素,从两个角度估计:(i)英国国民健康服务(NHS)和个人社会服务(PSS)的角度和(ii)社会的角度。结果:在这两个模型中,3个多月前开始出现COVID-19症状的经历与NHS和PSS成本(GLM: 319.8英镑,两部分:171.7英镑)(p < 0.001)和社会成本(GLM: 776.9英镑,两部分:675.6英镑)(p < 0.001)显著升高相关。前14天内的阳性检测结果与NHS和PSS成本(两部分:389.1英镑)(p < 0.05)和社会成本(GLM: 470.7英镑,两部分:439.2英镑)显著升高相关(p < 0.01)。31岁至55岁的社会成本明显高于16岁至30岁的社会成本。结论:本研究确定并量化了与英国第二波COVID-19大流行期间所产生的经济成本相关的因素。我们的研究结果可以为跨国比较和其他成本比较提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: PharmacoEconomics - Open focuses on applied research on the economic implications and health outcomes associated with drugs, devices and other healthcare interventions. The journal includes, but is not limited to, the following research areas:Economic analysis of healthcare interventionsHealth outcomes researchCost-of-illness studiesQuality-of-life studiesAdditional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in PharmacoEconomics -Open may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.All manuscripts are subject to peer review by international experts. Letters to the Editor are welcomed and will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信