Thirty-Day Mortality of Persistent Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: Insights from a Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Minji Jeon, Sukbin Jang, Seok Jun Mun, Si-Ho Kim
{"title":"Thirty-Day Mortality of Persistent Methicillin-Resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Bacteremia: Insights from a Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Minji Jeon, Sukbin Jang, Seok Jun Mun, Si-Ho Kim","doi":"10.3349/ymj.2023.0600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although glycopeptides remain the preferred treatment for methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) bacteremia, the treatment of persistent MRSA bacteremia has been challenging. We investigated real-world treatment strategies for persistent MRSA bacteremia, with a specific emphasis on the use of antimicrobial agents and the frequency of changes during the treatment course. We retrospectively identified patients with persistent MRSA bacteremia in four university-affiliated hospitals between 2017 and 2021. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the patterns of antimicrobial uses for MRSA bacteremia. The secondary objectives were evaluating the associated factors with 1) overall 30-day mortality and 2) changing agents during the treatment course. Time-dependent Cox regression analysis was used to adjust for immortal time bias. Among 116 patients, 37.1% underwent antimicrobials switching, primarily prompted by persistent bacteremia. The 30-day mortality rates of groups with and without antimicrobial switching were 21.4% and 44.2%, respectively (<i>p</i>=0.010 by log-rank test); however, after adjustment for immortal time bias, there was no statistical significance between the two groups (adjusted hazard ratio 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.03-2.17, <i>p</i>=0.238). Only the Pitt bacteremia score on day 4 and pneumonia were associated with 30-day mortality. Meanwhile, the factors associated with antimicrobial switching were the duration of bacteremia, the initial use of teicoplanin, echocardiogram, and Charlson comorbidity index. This study showed that while over one-third of persistent MRSA bacteremia patients experience changes in antimicrobial agents during treatment, this practice does not significantly improve the 30-day mortality. Our study suggests the need for more effective treatment strategies in managing persistent MRSA bacteremia.</p>","PeriodicalId":23765,"journal":{"name":"Yonsei Medical Journal","volume":"65 12","pages":"770-776"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11605044/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yonsei Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2023.0600","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although glycopeptides remain the preferred treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia, the treatment of persistent MRSA bacteremia has been challenging. We investigated real-world treatment strategies for persistent MRSA bacteremia, with a specific emphasis on the use of antimicrobial agents and the frequency of changes during the treatment course. We retrospectively identified patients with persistent MRSA bacteremia in four university-affiliated hospitals between 2017 and 2021. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the patterns of antimicrobial uses for MRSA bacteremia. The secondary objectives were evaluating the associated factors with 1) overall 30-day mortality and 2) changing agents during the treatment course. Time-dependent Cox regression analysis was used to adjust for immortal time bias. Among 116 patients, 37.1% underwent antimicrobials switching, primarily prompted by persistent bacteremia. The 30-day mortality rates of groups with and without antimicrobial switching were 21.4% and 44.2%, respectively (p=0.010 by log-rank test); however, after adjustment for immortal time bias, there was no statistical significance between the two groups (adjusted hazard ratio 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.03-2.17, p=0.238). Only the Pitt bacteremia score on day 4 and pneumonia were associated with 30-day mortality. Meanwhile, the factors associated with antimicrobial switching were the duration of bacteremia, the initial use of teicoplanin, echocardiogram, and Charlson comorbidity index. This study showed that while over one-third of persistent MRSA bacteremia patients experience changes in antimicrobial agents during treatment, this practice does not significantly improve the 30-day mortality. Our study suggests the need for more effective treatment strategies in managing persistent MRSA bacteremia.

持续耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的30天死亡率:来自回顾性队列研究的见解。
尽管糖肽仍然是耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)菌血症的首选治疗方法,但持续性MRSA菌血症的治疗一直具有挑战性。我们研究了现实世界中持久性MRSA菌血症的治疗策略,特别强调了抗菌药物的使用和治疗过程中变化的频率。我们回顾性地确定了2017年至2021年间四所大学附属医院的持续性MRSA菌血症患者。本研究的主要目的是调查抗菌药物用于MRSA菌血症的模式。次要目的是评估与1)总30天死亡率和2)治疗过程中药物变化相关的因素。时间相关Cox回归分析用于校正不朽时间偏差。在116名患者中,37.1%的患者进行了抗菌素转换,主要是由持续性菌血症引起的。切换组和未切换组的30天死亡率分别为21.4%和44.2% (log-rank检验p=0.010);但经不朽时间偏差校正后,两组间差异无统计学意义(校正风险比0.24,95%可信区间0.03 ~ 2.17,p=0.238)。只有第4天的Pitt菌血症评分和肺炎与30天死亡率相关。同时,与抗菌药物转换相关的因素是菌血症持续时间、最初使用替柯planin、超声心动图和Charlson合并症指数。这项研究表明,虽然超过三分之一的持续性MRSA菌血症患者在治疗期间抗菌药物发生了变化,但这种做法并没有显著改善30天死亡率。我们的研究表明需要更有效的治疗策略来管理持续性MRSA菌血症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Yonsei Medical Journal
Yonsei Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
167
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The goal of the Yonsei Medical Journal (YMJ) is to publish high quality manuscripts dedicated to clinical or basic research. Any authors affiliated with an accredited biomedical institution may submit manuscripts of original articles, review articles, case reports, brief communications, and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信