Is end-to-end or side-to-end anastomotic configuration associated with risk of positive intraoperative air leak test in left-sided colon and rectal resections for colon and rectal cancers?

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Sami Alahmadi, David L Berger, Christy E Cauley, Robert N Goldstone, William V Kastrinakis, Marc Rubin, Hiroko Kunitake, Rocco Ricciardi, Grace C Lee
{"title":"Is end-to-end or side-to-end anastomotic configuration associated with risk of positive intraoperative air leak test in left-sided colon and rectal resections for colon and rectal cancers?","authors":"Sami Alahmadi, David L Berger, Christy E Cauley, Robert N Goldstone, William V Kastrinakis, Marc Rubin, Hiroko Kunitake, Rocco Ricciardi, Grace C Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.gassur.2024.101899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anastomotic leak following colorectal resection is associated with morbidity, mortality, and poor bowel function. Minimal data exists on the relationship between anastomotic technique, intraoperative leak test, and subsequent clinical leak, particularly on the utility of performing end-to-end versus non-end-to-end anastomoses to avoid postoperative leaks. This study's aim was to analyze potential associations between anastomotic construction, intraoperative anastomotic assessments, and clinical leak.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients at a tertiary care center with colorectal cancer, who underwent left-sided colorectal resections with colorectal or coloanal anastomoses, comparing anastomotic technique. Outcomes were rates of intraoperative air leak, incomplete anastomotic donuts, and postoperative clinical leak. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate potential association between anastomotic technique and intraoperative anastomotic assessments and subsequent leak.</p><p><strong>Results/outcomes: </strong>Among 844 patients, 27 (3.2%) had intraoperative leak, 6 (0.7%) had incomplete donuts, and 27 (3.2%) experienced clinical leak. 500 (59.2%) patients had end-to-end anastomoses and 344 (40.7%) had non-end-to-end. There were no significant differences in demographics or comorbidities between groups (p>0.05) or rate of incomplete donuts (p=0.07). End-to-end anastomosis was associated with significantly more intraoperative air leaks than non-end-to-end on univariate (4.9% vs 1.2%, p=0.005) and multivariate analysis (OR 3.6; 95% CI 1.01-12.5, p= 0.049). There was no difference in postoperative clinical leak between groups on univariate (3.0% vs 3.5%, p=0.69) or multivariate analysis (OR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.40-2.34; p=0.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>End-to-end anastomosis is associated with higher rates of intraoperative air leak than non-end-to-end anastomosis, even after adjusting for potential confounders.</p>","PeriodicalId":15893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"101899"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2024.101899","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anastomotic leak following colorectal resection is associated with morbidity, mortality, and poor bowel function. Minimal data exists on the relationship between anastomotic technique, intraoperative leak test, and subsequent clinical leak, particularly on the utility of performing end-to-end versus non-end-to-end anastomoses to avoid postoperative leaks. This study's aim was to analyze potential associations between anastomotic construction, intraoperative anastomotic assessments, and clinical leak.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients at a tertiary care center with colorectal cancer, who underwent left-sided colorectal resections with colorectal or coloanal anastomoses, comparing anastomotic technique. Outcomes were rates of intraoperative air leak, incomplete anastomotic donuts, and postoperative clinical leak. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate potential association between anastomotic technique and intraoperative anastomotic assessments and subsequent leak.

Results/outcomes: Among 844 patients, 27 (3.2%) had intraoperative leak, 6 (0.7%) had incomplete donuts, and 27 (3.2%) experienced clinical leak. 500 (59.2%) patients had end-to-end anastomoses and 344 (40.7%) had non-end-to-end. There were no significant differences in demographics or comorbidities between groups (p>0.05) or rate of incomplete donuts (p=0.07). End-to-end anastomosis was associated with significantly more intraoperative air leaks than non-end-to-end on univariate (4.9% vs 1.2%, p=0.005) and multivariate analysis (OR 3.6; 95% CI 1.01-12.5, p= 0.049). There was no difference in postoperative clinical leak between groups on univariate (3.0% vs 3.5%, p=0.69) or multivariate analysis (OR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.40-2.34; p=0.94).

Conclusion: End-to-end anastomosis is associated with higher rates of intraoperative air leak than non-end-to-end anastomosis, even after adjusting for potential confounders.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery is a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that updates the surgeon on the latest developments in gastrointestinal surgery. The journal includes original articles on surgery of the digestive tract; gastrointestinal images; "How I Do It" articles, subject reviews, book reports, editorial columns, the SSAT Presidential Address, articles by a guest orator, symposia, letters, results of conferences and more. This is the official publication of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. The journal functions as an outstanding forum for continuing education in surgery and diseases of the gastrointestinal tract.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信