Is emergency doctors' tolerance of clinical uncertainty on a novel measure associated with doctor well-being, healthcare resource use and patient outcomes?

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Luke Budworth, Brad Wilson, Joanna Sutton-Klein, Subhashis Basu, Colin O'Keeffe, Suzanne M Mason, Andrew Ang, Sally Anne-Wilson, Kevin Reynard, Susan Croft, Anoop D Shah, Sakarias Bank, Mark Conner, Rebecca Lawton
{"title":"Is emergency doctors' tolerance of clinical uncertainty on a novel measure associated with doctor well-being, healthcare resource use and patient outcomes?","authors":"Luke Budworth, Brad Wilson, Joanna Sutton-Klein, Subhashis Basu, Colin O'Keeffe, Suzanne M Mason, Andrew Ang, Sally Anne-Wilson, Kevin Reynard, Susan Croft, Anoop D Shah, Sakarias Bank, Mark Conner, Rebecca Lawton","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2023-213256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Emergency doctors routinely face uncertainty-they work with limited patient information, under tight time constraints and receive minimal post-discharge feedback. While higher uncertainty tolerance (UT) among staff is linked with reduced resource use and improved well-being in various specialties, its impact in emergency settings is underexplored. We aimed to develop a UT measure and assess associations with doctor-related factors (eg, experience), patient outcomes (eg, reattendance) and resource use (eg, episode costs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From May 2021 to February 2022, emergency doctors (specialty trainee 3 and above) from five Yorkshire (UK) departments completed an online questionnaire. This included a novel UT measure-an adapted Physicians' Reaction to Uncertainty scale collaboratively modified within our team according to Hillen <i>et al</i>'s (2017) UT model. The questionnaire also included well-being-related measures (eg, Brief Resilience Scale) and assessed factors like doctors' seniority. Patient encounters involving prespecified 'uncertainty-inducing' problems (eg, headache) were analysed. Multilevel regression explored associations between doctor-level factors, resource use and patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>39 doctors were matched with 384 patients. The UT measure demonstrated high reliability (Cronbach's <i>α</i>=0.92) and higher UT was significantly associated with better psychological well-being including greater resilience (Pearson's r=0.56; 95% CI=0.30 to 0.74) and lower burnout (eg, Cohen's d=-2.98; -4.62 to -1.33; mean UT difference for 'no' vs 'moderate/high' burnout). UT was not significantly associated with resource use (eg, episode costs: β=-0.07; -0.32 to 0.18) or patient outcomes including 30-day readmission (eg, OR=0.82; 0.28 to 2.35).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed a reliable UT measure for emergency medicine. While higher UT was linked to doctor well-being, its impact on resource use and patient outcomes remains unclear. Further measure validation and additional research including intervention trials are necessary to confirm these findings and explore the implications of UT in emergency practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2023-213256","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Emergency doctors routinely face uncertainty-they work with limited patient information, under tight time constraints and receive minimal post-discharge feedback. While higher uncertainty tolerance (UT) among staff is linked with reduced resource use and improved well-being in various specialties, its impact in emergency settings is underexplored. We aimed to develop a UT measure and assess associations with doctor-related factors (eg, experience), patient outcomes (eg, reattendance) and resource use (eg, episode costs).

Methods: From May 2021 to February 2022, emergency doctors (specialty trainee 3 and above) from five Yorkshire (UK) departments completed an online questionnaire. This included a novel UT measure-an adapted Physicians' Reaction to Uncertainty scale collaboratively modified within our team according to Hillen et al's (2017) UT model. The questionnaire also included well-being-related measures (eg, Brief Resilience Scale) and assessed factors like doctors' seniority. Patient encounters involving prespecified 'uncertainty-inducing' problems (eg, headache) were analysed. Multilevel regression explored associations between doctor-level factors, resource use and patient outcomes.

Results: 39 doctors were matched with 384 patients. The UT measure demonstrated high reliability (Cronbach's α=0.92) and higher UT was significantly associated with better psychological well-being including greater resilience (Pearson's r=0.56; 95% CI=0.30 to 0.74) and lower burnout (eg, Cohen's d=-2.98; -4.62 to -1.33; mean UT difference for 'no' vs 'moderate/high' burnout). UT was not significantly associated with resource use (eg, episode costs: β=-0.07; -0.32 to 0.18) or patient outcomes including 30-day readmission (eg, OR=0.82; 0.28 to 2.35).

Conclusions: We developed a reliable UT measure for emergency medicine. While higher UT was linked to doctor well-being, its impact on resource use and patient outcomes remains unclear. Further measure validation and additional research including intervention trials are necessary to confirm these findings and explore the implications of UT in emergency practice.

急诊医生对临床不确定性的容忍度是否与医生幸福感、医疗资源使用和患者预后相关?
简介:急诊医生经常面临不确定性——他们在有限的病人信息下工作,在紧迫的时间限制下,获得的出院后反馈很少。虽然工作人员对不确定性容忍度的提高与减少资源使用和改善各专业的福利有关,但其在紧急情况下的影响尚未得到充分探讨。我们的目的是开发一种UT测量方法,并评估与医生相关因素(如经验)、患者预后(如复诊)和资源使用(如治疗费用)之间的关系。方法:2021年5月至2022年2月,对来自英国约克郡5个科室的急诊医生(专科见习3级及以上)进行在线问卷调查。这包括一种新的UT测量方法——根据海伦等人(2017)的UT模型,我们团队协作修改了一种改编的医生对不确定性的反应量表。问卷还包括与幸福感相关的测量(例如,简短恢复力量表)和评估因素,如医生的资历。对涉及预先指定的“不确定性诱发”问题(如头痛)的患者遭遇进行了分析。多水平回归探讨了医生水平因素、资源使用和患者预后之间的关系。结果:39名医生与384名患者匹配。UT测量具有高信度(Cronbach's α=0.92),较高的UT与较好的心理健康(包括较强的复原力)显著相关(Pearson's r=0.56;95% CI=0.30 ~ 0.74)和较低的倦怠(例如,Cohen’s d=-2.98;-4.62至-1.33;“不”与“中度/高度”倦怠的平均UT差异)。UT与资源使用无显著相关(例如,剧集成本:β=-0.07;-0.32至0.18)或包括30天再入院的患者结局(例如,or =0.82;0.28 - 2.35)。结论:我们开发了一种可靠的急诊医学UT测量方法。虽然较高的UT与医生的幸福感有关,但其对资源使用和患者预后的影响尚不清楚。进一步的测量验证和额外的研究包括干预试验是必要的,以证实这些发现,并探讨UT在急诊实践中的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
262
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信