Choice on the menu: Increasing meal choice for people living in residential aged care, a pilot study

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Mikaela Wheeler, Karen L. Abbey, Sandra M. Capra
{"title":"Choice on the menu: Increasing meal choice for people living in residential aged care, a pilot study","authors":"Mikaela Wheeler,&nbsp;Karen L. Abbey,&nbsp;Sandra M. Capra","doi":"10.1111/jhn.13401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>For residents in residential aged care (RAC), opportunities to make decisions about their meals are often limited. Increasing choice for residents requires significant changes to be made to the foodservice system to deliver nutritionally adequate, timely and enjoyable meals to residents. The pilot project aimed to understand the effect of increasing choice in meals on residents, staff and the foodservice system.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A pragmatic action research approach was used to collaboratively design and evaluate an altered a foodservice system that increased choice, enabling residents to place their order at the mealtime and choose from a menu of seven hot meal options for lunch and dinner. Outcome measures were measured pre- and post-implementation and included food waste, resident satisfaction and foodservice costs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Resident satisfaction measured on a 5-point Likert scale improved between pre- (3.60 ± 1.09) and post- (4.57 ± 0.49) measurements, whereas production waste increased (pre—55g, post—90 g) and foodservice costs increased (pre—$9.20–$11.14 per resident per day, post—$11.01–$12.15 per resident per day). Compared to the standard cook serve meal, consumption of protein foods increased marginally (+5 g), vegetable consumption increased (+11 g) and carbohydrate consumption decreased (−38 g) for meals consumed from the intervention menu.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Increasing choice can have a positive impact of resident satisfaction; however, further work is needed to investigate how production waste and costs can be addressed.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jhn.13401","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

For residents in residential aged care (RAC), opportunities to make decisions about their meals are often limited. Increasing choice for residents requires significant changes to be made to the foodservice system to deliver nutritionally adequate, timely and enjoyable meals to residents. The pilot project aimed to understand the effect of increasing choice in meals on residents, staff and the foodservice system.

Methods

A pragmatic action research approach was used to collaboratively design and evaluate an altered a foodservice system that increased choice, enabling residents to place their order at the mealtime and choose from a menu of seven hot meal options for lunch and dinner. Outcome measures were measured pre- and post-implementation and included food waste, resident satisfaction and foodservice costs.

Results

Resident satisfaction measured on a 5-point Likert scale improved between pre- (3.60 ± 1.09) and post- (4.57 ± 0.49) measurements, whereas production waste increased (pre—55g, post—90 g) and foodservice costs increased (pre—$9.20–$11.14 per resident per day, post—$11.01–$12.15 per resident per day). Compared to the standard cook serve meal, consumption of protein foods increased marginally (+5 g), vegetable consumption increased (+11 g) and carbohydrate consumption decreased (−38 g) for meals consumed from the intervention menu.

Conclusions

Increasing choice can have a positive impact of resident satisfaction; however, further work is needed to investigate how production waste and costs can be addressed.

菜单上的选择:一项试点研究增加了居住在养老院的人们的膳食选择
对于居住在老年护理(RAC)的居民来说,决定他们的膳食的机会通常是有限的。居民的选择越来越多,需要对食品服务系统做出重大改变,为居民提供营养充足、及时和愉快的膳食。该试点项目旨在了解增加膳食选择对居民、工作人员和餐饮服务系统的影响。方法采用务实的行动研究方法,协同设计和评估改变后的餐饮服务系统,该系统增加了选择,使居民能够在用餐时间下单,并从午餐和晚餐的七种热餐菜单中进行选择。结果测量是在实施前和实施后测量的,包括食物浪费、居民满意度和餐饮服务成本。结果5点李克特量表测量的居民满意度在(3.60±1.09)和(4.57±0.49)测量之间有所改善,而生产浪费增加(55g前,90 g后),餐饮服务成本增加(每人每天9.20 - 11.14美元,11.01 - 12.15美元)。与标准的烹饪餐相比,从干预菜单中食用的食物中,蛋白质食物的摄入量略有增加(+5克),蔬菜摄入量增加(+11克),碳水化合物摄入量减少(- 38克)。结论增加选择对居民满意度有正向影响;然而,需要进一步研究如何解决生产浪费和成本问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing papers in applied nutrition and dietetics. Papers are therefore welcomed on: - Clinical nutrition and the practice of therapeutic dietetics - Clinical and professional guidelines - Public health nutrition and nutritional epidemiology - Dietary surveys and dietary assessment methodology - Health promotion and intervention studies and their effectiveness - Obesity, weight control and body composition - Research on psychological determinants of healthy and unhealthy eating behaviour. Focus can for example be on attitudes, brain correlates of food reward processing, social influences, impulsivity, cognitive control, cognitive processes, dieting, psychological treatments. - Appetite, Food intake and nutritional status - Nutrigenomics and molecular nutrition - The journal does not publish animal research The journal is published in an online-only format. No printed issue of this title will be produced but authors will still be able to order offprints of their own articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信