A Comparative Analysis of Neurological Soft Signs and Emotional Intelligence in Rapid Cycling and Non-Rapid Cycling Bipolar Disorder

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Feng Yingying, Yang Bo, Zhao Jun
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of Neurological Soft Signs and Emotional Intelligence in Rapid Cycling and Non-Rapid Cycling Bipolar Disorder","authors":"Feng Yingying,&nbsp;Yang Bo,&nbsp;Zhao Jun","doi":"10.1111/appy.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Rapid cycling (RC) is a special subtype of bipolar disorder (BD). Previous studies have rarely involved the investigation of neurological soft signs (NSS) and emotional intelligence (EI) in rapid cycling patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Object</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to compare the differences in NSS and EI between patients with RC and non-rapid cycling (NRC) in BD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The Cambridge Neurological Inventory and The Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test were used to assess the NSS and EI levels of euthymic patients with BD and healthy controls (HC). Patients were divided into RC and NRC groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In terms of NSS, both the RC and NRC groups scored significantly higher than the HC group in the Motor coordination subdomain and total scores. In the Sensory integration subdomain, there was a significant trend of RC group scoring higher than the NRC group, which in turn scored higher than the HC group. In terms of EI, there was a trend of RC group scoring lower than the NRC group, which scored lower than the HC group in the understanding emotions subdomain and MSCEIT total score. In the managing emotions subdomain, the RC group scored lower than the HC group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Compared to the NRC group, the RC group exhibited higher NSS levels, mainly manifesting in more severe sensory integration impairment. The RC group scored lower in EI, primarily reflected in understanding and managing emotions, and the managing emotions subdomain may serve as a more sensitive indicator to distinguish between the two groups.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8618,"journal":{"name":"Asia‐Pacific Psychiatry","volume":"16 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia‐Pacific Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/appy.70000","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Rapid cycling (RC) is a special subtype of bipolar disorder (BD). Previous studies have rarely involved the investigation of neurological soft signs (NSS) and emotional intelligence (EI) in rapid cycling patients.

Object

This study aims to compare the differences in NSS and EI between patients with RC and non-rapid cycling (NRC) in BD.

Methods

The Cambridge Neurological Inventory and The Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test were used to assess the NSS and EI levels of euthymic patients with BD and healthy controls (HC). Patients were divided into RC and NRC groups.

Results

In terms of NSS, both the RC and NRC groups scored significantly higher than the HC group in the Motor coordination subdomain and total scores. In the Sensory integration subdomain, there was a significant trend of RC group scoring higher than the NRC group, which in turn scored higher than the HC group. In terms of EI, there was a trend of RC group scoring lower than the NRC group, which scored lower than the HC group in the understanding emotions subdomain and MSCEIT total score. In the managing emotions subdomain, the RC group scored lower than the HC group.

Conclusion

Compared to the NRC group, the RC group exhibited higher NSS levels, mainly manifesting in more severe sensory integration impairment. The RC group scored lower in EI, primarily reflected in understanding and managing emotions, and the managing emotions subdomain may serve as a more sensitive indicator to distinguish between the two groups.

快速循环与非快速循环双相情感障碍的神经软体征及情绪智力比较分析
快速循环(RC)是双相情感障碍(BD)的一种特殊亚型。以往的研究很少涉及对快速循环患者的神经软体征(NSS)和情绪智力(EI)的调查。目的比较BD患者与非快速循环(NRC)患者NSS和EI水平的差异。方法采用剑桥神经量表和Mayer-Salovey-Caruso情绪智力测验评估健康BD患者和健康对照(HC)的NSS和EI水平。患者分为RC组和NRC组。结果在NSS方面,RC组和NRC组在运动协调子域和总分上均显著高于HC组。在感觉统合子域上,RC组得分高于NRC组,NRC组得分又高于HC组。在情商方面,RC组得分低于NRC组,NRC组在理解情绪子领域和MSCEIT总分上得分低于HC组。在情绪管理子领域,RC组得分低于HC组。结论与NRC组相比,RC组NSS水平较高,主要表现为感觉统合障碍加重。RC组的EI得分较低,主要体现在理解和管理情绪方面,情绪管理子域可能是区分两组的一个更敏感的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Asia-Pacific Psychiatry is an international psychiatric journal focused on the Asia and Pacific Rim region, and is the official journal of the Pacific Rim College of Psychiatrics. Asia-Pacific Psychiatry enables psychiatric and other mental health professionals in the region to share their research, education programs and clinical experience with a larger international readership. The journal offers a venue for high quality research for and from the region in the face of minimal international publication availability for authors concerned with the region. This includes findings highlighting the diversity in psychiatric behaviour, treatment and outcome related to social, ethnic, cultural and economic differences of the region. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and reviews, as well as clinically and educationally focused papers on regional best practices. Images, videos, a young psychiatrist''s corner, meeting reports, a journal club and contextual commentaries differentiate this journal from existing main stream psychiatry journals that are focused on other regions, or nationally focused within countries of Asia and the Pacific Rim.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信