Innovation and Adaptation in COVID-19 Pandemic Posthospital Discharge Contact and Monitoring in the United States

Katrina E. Hauschildt PhD , Jacquelyn Miller MA , Nathan Wright MA , Amanda Schutz PhD , Lexi Wilhelmsen MPH , Katharine Seagly PhD , Sara E. Golden PhD , Aluko A. Hope MD , Kelly C. Vranas MD , Catherine L. Hough MD , Thomas S. Valley MD
{"title":"Innovation and Adaptation in COVID-19 Pandemic Posthospital Discharge Contact and Monitoring in the United States","authors":"Katrina E. Hauschildt PhD ,&nbsp;Jacquelyn Miller MA ,&nbsp;Nathan Wright MA ,&nbsp;Amanda Schutz PhD ,&nbsp;Lexi Wilhelmsen MPH ,&nbsp;Katharine Seagly PhD ,&nbsp;Sara E. Golden PhD ,&nbsp;Aluko A. Hope MD ,&nbsp;Kelly C. Vranas MD ,&nbsp;Catherine L. Hough MD ,&nbsp;Thomas S. Valley MD","doi":"10.1016/j.chstcc.2024.100101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>To address unknown risk for readmission among patients with COVID-19 and persistent capacity strain, hospital systems used postdischarge contact and monitoring to facilitate safe discharge and recovery. However, little work has systematically documented how hospitals implemented changes to hospitalization postdischarge contact practices during COVID-19.</div></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><div>How did hospitals’ innovate and adapt postdischarge telephone follow-up and remote monitoring strategies to assess discharged patients with COVID-19 for risk of readmission and recovery progress?</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><div>Semistructured interviews were conducted (January 2022 to March 2023) with 70 inpatient and outpatient providers and administrators (5-12 per site) in nine health systems that varied by size, region, rurality, proportion of Medicaid patients, and estimated scale of post-COVID-19 care organization. Participants described innovation in and implementation of discharge and postdischarge care processes used to assess patients with COVID-19 for readmission risk and recovery progress. The primary analysis was site-level case comparative analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Respondents described hospital systems’ motivations for adapting preexisting resources and innovating new postdischarge programs, including postdischarge telephone follow-up and remote monitoring programs, to facilitate safe hospital discharge and transitions to ambulatory care for patients with COVID-19. Respondents also explained various factors that influenced the implementation and use of postdischarge contact practices. Participants perceived that these practices mitigated postdischarge risks and alleviated capacity strain. Respondents described retiring or adapting remote monitoring programs for other conditions as COVID-19 demands declined.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Our results show that hospitals implemented and adapted postdischarge practices to help facilitate recovery and address unknown risk for readmission during the pandemic. Some efforts may present opportunities to manage readmission concerns and capacity strain more generally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93934,"journal":{"name":"CHEST critical care","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST critical care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949788424000558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

To address unknown risk for readmission among patients with COVID-19 and persistent capacity strain, hospital systems used postdischarge contact and monitoring to facilitate safe discharge and recovery. However, little work has systematically documented how hospitals implemented changes to hospitalization postdischarge contact practices during COVID-19.

Research Question

How did hospitals’ innovate and adapt postdischarge telephone follow-up and remote monitoring strategies to assess discharged patients with COVID-19 for risk of readmission and recovery progress?

Study Design and Methods

Semistructured interviews were conducted (January 2022 to March 2023) with 70 inpatient and outpatient providers and administrators (5-12 per site) in nine health systems that varied by size, region, rurality, proportion of Medicaid patients, and estimated scale of post-COVID-19 care organization. Participants described innovation in and implementation of discharge and postdischarge care processes used to assess patients with COVID-19 for readmission risk and recovery progress. The primary analysis was site-level case comparative analysis.

Results

Respondents described hospital systems’ motivations for adapting preexisting resources and innovating new postdischarge programs, including postdischarge telephone follow-up and remote monitoring programs, to facilitate safe hospital discharge and transitions to ambulatory care for patients with COVID-19. Respondents also explained various factors that influenced the implementation and use of postdischarge contact practices. Participants perceived that these practices mitigated postdischarge risks and alleviated capacity strain. Respondents described retiring or adapting remote monitoring programs for other conditions as COVID-19 demands declined.

Interpretation

Our results show that hospitals implemented and adapted postdischarge practices to help facilitate recovery and address unknown risk for readmission during the pandemic. Some efforts may present opportunities to manage readmission concerns and capacity strain more generally.
美国COVID-19大流行患者出院后接触与监测的创新与适应
背景:为了解决COVID-19患者再入院的未知风险和持续的能力紧张,医院系统采用出院后接触和监测方法,以促进安全出院和康复。然而,很少有工作系统地记录了医院在COVID-19期间如何实施住院出院后接触做法的变化。研究问题:医院如何创新和调整出院后电话随访和远程监测策略来评估出院COVID-19患者的再入院风险和康复进展?研究设计和方法在2022年1月至2023年3月期间,对9个卫生系统的70名住院和门诊提供者和管理人员(每个站点5-12人)进行了半结构化访谈,这些卫生系统因规模、地区、农村、医疗补助患者比例和covid -19后护理组织的估计规模而异。与会者描述了用于评估COVID-19患者再入院风险和康复进展的出院和出院后护理流程的创新和实施情况。主要分析是现场水平的病例比较分析。结果受访者描述了医院系统调整现有资源和创新新的出院后计划(包括出院后电话随访和远程监测计划)的动机,以促进COVID-19患者的安全出院和向门诊护理过渡。受访者还解释了影响出院后接触做法实施和使用的各种因素。与会者认为,这些做法减轻了出院后的风险,减轻了能力紧张。受访者表示,随着COVID-19需求下降,他们将退休或调整远程监测计划以适应其他情况。我们的研究结果表明,医院实施并调整了出院后的做法,以帮助促进康复,并解决大流行期间再入院的未知风险。一些努力可能为更普遍地管理再入院问题和能力紧张提供机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CHEST critical care
CHEST critical care Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信