The effect of smokeless tobacco (SLT) excise taxes on SLT use among youth

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Yanyun He , Hojin Park , Kai-Wen Cheng , Qian Yang , Zezhong Zhang , Ce Shang
{"title":"The effect of smokeless tobacco (SLT) excise taxes on SLT use among youth","authors":"Yanyun He ,&nbsp;Hojin Park ,&nbsp;Kai-Wen Cheng ,&nbsp;Qian Yang ,&nbsp;Zezhong Zhang ,&nbsp;Ce Shang","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Smokeless Tobacco (SLT) use prevalence among youth in the United States (US) is comparable to youth prevalence of cigarette smoking. However, it is in general understudied compared to cigarettes and draws less attention nowadays compared to e-cigarettes (ECs).</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>We estimate the own- and cross-tax elasticities of SLT use among US youth and explicitly test how SLT use changes in response to taxes on SLT, cigarettes, ECs, and beer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We standardized SLT taxes for chewing tobacco, moist snuff, dry snuff, and snus, and computed average SLT taxes. We implemented a logit regression model within the state- and year-fixed effects framework.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A 10 % increase in SLT excise taxes reduced youth SLT use by 4 % (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01). This result is primarily driven by males, Whites, multiple non-Hispanic races, other races, and individuals living in non-Appalachian states. In addition, a 10 % increase in cigarette taxes increases youth SLT use by 8 % (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05), suggesting substitutional effects. A 10 % increase in EC and beer taxes reduce SLT use by 0.5 % and 2.4 % (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01), respectively, suggesting complementary effects.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Raising excise taxes on SLT products can effectively curtail their usage among the youth population. Furthermore, increasing EC and beer taxes reduces youth SLT use. However, an increase in cigarette taxes leads to an unintended consequence of promoting SLT use among youth. In addition, increasing SLT taxes does not appear to significantly impact the disparities in youth SLT use by whether living in Appalachian states. Future research is needed to assess whether SLT taxes reduce disparities in use by rural/urban divisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 104664"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924003487","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Smokeless Tobacco (SLT) use prevalence among youth in the United States (US) is comparable to youth prevalence of cigarette smoking. However, it is in general understudied compared to cigarettes and draws less attention nowadays compared to e-cigarettes (ECs).

Aim

We estimate the own- and cross-tax elasticities of SLT use among US youth and explicitly test how SLT use changes in response to taxes on SLT, cigarettes, ECs, and beer.

Methods

We standardized SLT taxes for chewing tobacco, moist snuff, dry snuff, and snus, and computed average SLT taxes. We implemented a logit regression model within the state- and year-fixed effects framework.

Results

A 10 % increase in SLT excise taxes reduced youth SLT use by 4 % (p < 0.01). This result is primarily driven by males, Whites, multiple non-Hispanic races, other races, and individuals living in non-Appalachian states. In addition, a 10 % increase in cigarette taxes increases youth SLT use by 8 % (p < 0.05), suggesting substitutional effects. A 10 % increase in EC and beer taxes reduce SLT use by 0.5 % and 2.4 % (p < 0.01), respectively, suggesting complementary effects.

Conclusion

Raising excise taxes on SLT products can effectively curtail their usage among the youth population. Furthermore, increasing EC and beer taxes reduces youth SLT use. However, an increase in cigarette taxes leads to an unintended consequence of promoting SLT use among youth. In addition, increasing SLT taxes does not appear to significantly impact the disparities in youth SLT use by whether living in Appalachian states. Future research is needed to assess whether SLT taxes reduce disparities in use by rural/urban divisions.
无烟烟草消费税对青少年使用无烟烟草的影响
背景:美国青少年使用无烟烟草(SLT)的流行程度与青少年吸烟的流行程度相当。然而,与香烟相比,它通常没有得到充分的研究,而且与电子烟(ECs)相比,它现在受到的关注较少。目的:我们估计了美国年轻人使用SLT的自身和跨税弹性,并明确测试了SLT使用如何响应SLT,香烟,ec和啤酒的税收变化。方法对嚼烟、湿鼻烟、干鼻烟和鼻烟的SLT税进行标准化,计算平均SLT税。我们在状态和年份固定效应框架内实现了一个logit回归模型。结果:SLT消费税每增加10%,青少年SLT使用率降低4% (p <;0.01)。这一结果主要是由男性、白人、多个非西班牙裔种族、其他种族和居住在非阿巴拉契亚州的个人造成的。此外,烟草税每增加10%,青少年的烟草使用就会增加8% (p <;0.05),提示存在替代效应。EC和啤酒税增加10%将使SLT的使用减少0.5%和2.4% (p <;0.01),提示互补效应。结论提高SLT产品的消费税可以有效抑制青少年对SLT产品的使用。此外,增加EC和啤酒税减少了青少年使用SLT。然而,烟草税的增加导致了促进青少年使用SLT的意外后果。此外,无论是否生活在阿巴拉契亚州,增加SLT税似乎都不会显著影响青少年SLT使用的差异。未来的研究需要评估SLT税是否会减少农村/城市分区使用的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信