Hip joint kinematic assessment in chronic non-specific low back pain patients. A Delphi study

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Maya Abady Avman, Peter G. Osmotherly, Suzanne J. Snodgrass
{"title":"Hip joint kinematic assessment in chronic non-specific low back pain patients. A Delphi study","authors":"Maya Abady Avman,&nbsp;Peter G. Osmotherly,&nbsp;Suzanne J. Snodgrass","doi":"10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNSLBP) has been associated with movement impairment (MI) of the hip joint. However, evidence supporting this is inconsistent.</div><div>Agreement from experts may provide rationale and recommendations for the assessment of the hip joint in the management of CNSLBP patients.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Gain expert consensus on whether hip MIs are related to CNSLBP, whether they should be assessed and which movement types and directions they recommend.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Through a three-round e-Delphi process, international experts in the field rated levels of agreement for generated themes pertaining to assessing proposed hip joint MI in individuals with CNSLBP and underlying rationales. Consensus was defined a priori as ≥75% ratings on Likert scales with an IQR≤ 1.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>International expert panel consisted of a mix of researchers and clinicians with the majority involved in both. Response for round I was 27, round 2 was 21 and round III was 26 individuals.</div><div>Consensus was achieved for the association of active and passive hip joint MI in CNSLBP and their assessment. 100% agreement was achieved for the rationale regarding compensatory movement of the lumbar spine, and the assessment of passive hip movements, in particular extension. Consensus was also achieved for assessing hip passive flexion, extension, rotations, and abduction, active flexion, extension, and abduction. No agreement was attained regarding passive accessory movement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The assessment of active and passive hip joint MI is regarded by experts as appropriate and informative in the management of and research pertaining to CNSLBP.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56036,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 103215"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468781224003102","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNSLBP) has been associated with movement impairment (MI) of the hip joint. However, evidence supporting this is inconsistent.
Agreement from experts may provide rationale and recommendations for the assessment of the hip joint in the management of CNSLBP patients.

Objective

Gain expert consensus on whether hip MIs are related to CNSLBP, whether they should be assessed and which movement types and directions they recommend.

Methods

Through a three-round e-Delphi process, international experts in the field rated levels of agreement for generated themes pertaining to assessing proposed hip joint MI in individuals with CNSLBP and underlying rationales. Consensus was defined a priori as ≥75% ratings on Likert scales with an IQR≤ 1.

Results

International expert panel consisted of a mix of researchers and clinicians with the majority involved in both. Response for round I was 27, round 2 was 21 and round III was 26 individuals.
Consensus was achieved for the association of active and passive hip joint MI in CNSLBP and their assessment. 100% agreement was achieved for the rationale regarding compensatory movement of the lumbar spine, and the assessment of passive hip movements, in particular extension. Consensus was also achieved for assessing hip passive flexion, extension, rotations, and abduction, active flexion, extension, and abduction. No agreement was attained regarding passive accessory movement.

Conclusion

The assessment of active and passive hip joint MI is regarded by experts as appropriate and informative in the management of and research pertaining to CNSLBP.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
152
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Science & Practice, international journal of musculoskeletal physiotherapy, is a peer-reviewed international journal (previously Manual Therapy), publishing high quality original research, review and Masterclass articles that contribute to improving the clinical understanding of appropriate care processes for musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes articles that influence or add to the body of evidence on diagnostic and therapeutic processes, patient centered care, guidelines for musculoskeletal therapeutics and theoretical models that support developments in assessment, diagnosis, clinical reasoning and interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信