Exploring farmer’s assessment of soil quality and root yield in cassava-based cropping systems

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Samuel Ayodele Mesele , Paul Sobowale Soremi , James Kehinde Adigun
{"title":"Exploring farmer’s assessment of soil quality and root yield in cassava-based cropping systems","authors":"Samuel Ayodele Mesele ,&nbsp;Paul Sobowale Soremi ,&nbsp;James Kehinde Adigun","doi":"10.1016/j.jssas.2024.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Farmers’ knowledge of soil quality and yield assessment were evaluated among cassava farmers in southwestern Nigeria. Data were collected on farmers’ demography, farming experience, criteria for selecting a site for cassava cultivation and preferences for those criteria, farmers’ methods of yield prediction and how it compares with the scientific approach, farmers’ agronomic knowledge and how it relates to the realities of climate change and soil fertility decline. The modal age class of the farmers is 45–55 years, and most of the farmers are male. The results show that farmers use a combination of soil and vegetation-based criteria to assess soil quality from which the decision to cultivate a given land is made. Among the soil-based criteria, soil drainage, colour, and depth rank the most and most used. Most of the farmers assessed yield before harvesting through green healthy leaves (25 %), large and shiny stems (25 %) and soil cracks (50 %). The predicted and measured cassava yields on farmer-managed farms were comparable, with an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.63, although farmers overestimated the cassava root yield. There is a unanimous consensus among farmers that yield has declined in the last decade, with a mean of 36 %. The main cause of yield decline was attributed to declining rainfall and poor soils. Our study concluded that farmers have a good understanding of soil health and cassava agronomy through a process of trial and error and ingenuity as farmers’ local indices were consistent with conventional soil health indicators. It was suggested that, by recognising and incorporating traditional methods used by farmers to assess soil quality, we could enhance soil management strategies and raise productivity at the farm level.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17560,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences","volume":"23 8","pages":"Pages 533-541"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1658077X2400064X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Farmers’ knowledge of soil quality and yield assessment were evaluated among cassava farmers in southwestern Nigeria. Data were collected on farmers’ demography, farming experience, criteria for selecting a site for cassava cultivation and preferences for those criteria, farmers’ methods of yield prediction and how it compares with the scientific approach, farmers’ agronomic knowledge and how it relates to the realities of climate change and soil fertility decline. The modal age class of the farmers is 45–55 years, and most of the farmers are male. The results show that farmers use a combination of soil and vegetation-based criteria to assess soil quality from which the decision to cultivate a given land is made. Among the soil-based criteria, soil drainage, colour, and depth rank the most and most used. Most of the farmers assessed yield before harvesting through green healthy leaves (25 %), large and shiny stems (25 %) and soil cracks (50 %). The predicted and measured cassava yields on farmer-managed farms were comparable, with an R2 of 0.63, although farmers overestimated the cassava root yield. There is a unanimous consensus among farmers that yield has declined in the last decade, with a mean of 36 %. The main cause of yield decline was attributed to declining rainfall and poor soils. Our study concluded that farmers have a good understanding of soil health and cassava agronomy through a process of trial and error and ingenuity as farmers’ local indices were consistent with conventional soil health indicators. It was suggested that, by recognising and incorporating traditional methods used by farmers to assess soil quality, we could enhance soil management strategies and raise productivity at the farm level.
探讨农民对木薯种植系统土壤质量和根系产量的评价
对尼日利亚西南部木薯种植户的土壤质量和产量评估知识进行了评估。收集的数据包括农民的人口统计、农业经验、选择木薯种植地点的标准和对这些标准的偏好、农民的产量预测方法及其与科学方法的比较、农民的农艺知识及其与气候变化和土壤肥力下降的现实之间的关系。农民的模态年龄层为45 ~ 55岁,以男性为主。结果表明,农民使用基于土壤和植被的综合标准来评估土壤质量,并以此为基础做出开垦特定土地的决定。在以土壤为基础的标准中,土壤排水,颜色和深度排名最多和最常用。大多数农民在收获前通过健康的绿叶(25%)、大而有光泽的茎(25%)和土壤裂缝(50%)来评估产量。农民管理的农场的预测和测量的木薯产量具有可比性,R2为0.63,尽管农民高估了木薯根的产量。农民们一致认为,在过去十年中,产量下降了36%。产量下降的主要原因是降雨减少和土壤贫瘠。我们的研究得出结论,农民通过试错和聪明才智的过程,对土壤健康和木薯农艺有很好的了解,因为农民的当地指标与传统的土壤健康指标一致。有人建议,通过认识和结合农民用来评估土壤质量的传统方法,我们可以加强土壤管理战略,提高农场一级的生产力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences
Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences is an English language, peer-review scholarly publication which publishes research articles and critical reviews from every area of Agricultural sciences and plant science. Scope of the journal includes, Agricultural Engineering, Plant production, Plant protection, Animal science, Agricultural extension, Agricultural economics, Food science and technology, Soil and water sciences, Irrigation science and technology and environmental science (soil formation, biological classification, mapping and management of soil). Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences publishes 4 issues per year and is the official publication of the King Saud University and Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences and is published by King Saud University in collaboration with Elsevier and is edited by an international group of eminent researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信