Inappropriate use of statistical methods leads to unsupported conclusions about risk of plague to an imperiled chipmunk: A critique of Goldberg et al. (2022)

IF 3.5 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Jennifer K. Frey, Fiona E. McKibben , Matthew E. Gompper , Fitsum Abadi
{"title":"Inappropriate use of statistical methods leads to unsupported conclusions about risk of plague to an imperiled chipmunk: A critique of Goldberg et al. (2022)","authors":"Jennifer K. Frey,&nbsp;Fiona E. McKibben ,&nbsp;Matthew E. Gompper ,&nbsp;Fitsum Abadi","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Plague is a zoonotic disease caused by the bacterium <em>Yersinia pestis</em> that can cause endangerment or extinction of wildlife populations. A recent study by Goldberg et al. (2022) sought to determine if plague was circulating within the small mammal communities associated with the Peñasco least chipmunk, which has been proposed for listing as endangered on the Endangered Species Act. We identified substantial problems with the statistical approaches used by Goldberg et al., including testing more models than the data can support and failing to recognize models with uninformative parameters. Contrary to their findings, our reexamination of their analyses and results suggests little evidence for plague in this system and that prophylactic measures to prevent plague do not warrant the risks that implementing such a program would have on the chipmunk. We recommend that future studies directly assess the presence of plague in both the associated rodent community and sentinel species. We also recommend that researchers carefully consider the goals of their study and collaborate with statistical/quantitative ecologists to ensure that the study design is appropriate and capable of generating the necessary sample sizes. We strongly emphasize the recommendations made by other researchers about the importance of adequately reporting methods and results in scientific studies. We also urge researchers to evaluate models for uninformative parameters to avoid erroneous conclusions that could potentially lead to wrong management decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article e03307"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989424005110","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plague is a zoonotic disease caused by the bacterium Yersinia pestis that can cause endangerment or extinction of wildlife populations. A recent study by Goldberg et al. (2022) sought to determine if plague was circulating within the small mammal communities associated with the Peñasco least chipmunk, which has been proposed for listing as endangered on the Endangered Species Act. We identified substantial problems with the statistical approaches used by Goldberg et al., including testing more models than the data can support and failing to recognize models with uninformative parameters. Contrary to their findings, our reexamination of their analyses and results suggests little evidence for plague in this system and that prophylactic measures to prevent plague do not warrant the risks that implementing such a program would have on the chipmunk. We recommend that future studies directly assess the presence of plague in both the associated rodent community and sentinel species. We also recommend that researchers carefully consider the goals of their study and collaborate with statistical/quantitative ecologists to ensure that the study design is appropriate and capable of generating the necessary sample sizes. We strongly emphasize the recommendations made by other researchers about the importance of adequately reporting methods and results in scientific studies. We also urge researchers to evaluate models for uninformative parameters to avoid erroneous conclusions that could potentially lead to wrong management decisions.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信