Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: History, Indications, Design, Outcomes, and Complications

IF 0.2 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
J. Austin Stratton BS, Steve H. Bayer MD, Justin W. Arner MD
{"title":"Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: History, Indications, Design, Outcomes, and Complications","authors":"J. Austin Stratton BS,&nbsp;Steve H. Bayer MD,&nbsp;Justin W. Arner MD","doi":"10.1016/j.oto.2024.101149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has become an increasingly common procedure with rapidly expanding indications. The purpose of this review is to summarize the history of the rTSA, provide an overview of modern implant design, and discuss the expanding indications for primary rTSA, rTSA in the revision setting, and the associated outcomes. The Grammont rTSA was introduced in 1985 for the treatment of cuff tear arthroplasty (CTA). Due to complications including scapular notching, stress fracture of the acromion and scapular spine, and instability, subsequent iterations have included glenoid component lateralization, changes in glenoid baseplate positioning, variations in humeral neck shaft angle, and inlay vs onlay humeral component design. Modernization of the rTSA design has resulted in expanding indications beyond CTA, including irreparable cuff tear, primary osteoarthritis, and fracture. Modern rTSA designs have demonstrated improvement in patient reported outcomes and pain from preoperative baseline with high patient satisfaction. However, rates of scapular notching increase over time and functional outcomes remain limited by deficits in range of motion, especially with internal rotation. An ideal implant configuration has not been identified, but navigation and extended reality are emerging areas of study that may improve implant placement and patient outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45242,"journal":{"name":"Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics","volume":"34 4","pages":"Article 101149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1048666624000582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has become an increasingly common procedure with rapidly expanding indications. The purpose of this review is to summarize the history of the rTSA, provide an overview of modern implant design, and discuss the expanding indications for primary rTSA, rTSA in the revision setting, and the associated outcomes. The Grammont rTSA was introduced in 1985 for the treatment of cuff tear arthroplasty (CTA). Due to complications including scapular notching, stress fracture of the acromion and scapular spine, and instability, subsequent iterations have included glenoid component lateralization, changes in glenoid baseplate positioning, variations in humeral neck shaft angle, and inlay vs onlay humeral component design. Modernization of the rTSA design has resulted in expanding indications beyond CTA, including irreparable cuff tear, primary osteoarthritis, and fracture. Modern rTSA designs have demonstrated improvement in patient reported outcomes and pain from preoperative baseline with high patient satisfaction. However, rates of scapular notching increase over time and functional outcomes remain limited by deficits in range of motion, especially with internal rotation. An ideal implant configuration has not been identified, but navigation and extended reality are emerging areas of study that may improve implant placement and patient outcomes.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics is an innovative, richly illustrated resource that keeps practitioners informed of significant advances in all areas of surgical management. Each issue of this atlas-style journal explores a single topic, often offering alternate approaches to the same procedure. Its current, definitive information keeps readers in the forefront of their specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信