Rapid in vivo EPID image prediction using a combination of analytically calculated attenuation and AI predicted scatter

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Medical physics Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1002/mp.17549
Brian Anderson, Lance Moore, Casey Bojechko
{"title":"Rapid in vivo EPID image prediction using a combination of analytically calculated attenuation and AI predicted scatter","authors":"Brian Anderson,&nbsp;Lance Moore,&nbsp;Casey Bojechko","doi":"10.1002/mp.17549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The electronic portal imaging device (EPID) can be used in vivo, to detect on-treatment errors by evaluating radiation exiting a patient. To detect deviations from the planning intent, image predictions need to be modeled based on the patient's anatomy and plan information. To date in vivo transit images have been predicted using Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms. A deep learning approach can make predictions faster than MC and only requires patient information for training.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To test the feasibility and reliability of creating a deep-learning model with patient data for predicting in vivo EPID images for IMRT treatments.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In our approach, the in vivo EPID image was separated into contributions from primary and scattered photons. A primary photon attenuation function was determined by measuring attenuation factors for various thicknesses of solid water. The scatter component of in vivo EPID images was estimated using a convolutional neural network (CNN). The CNN input was a 3-channel image comprised of the non-transit EPID image and ray tracing projections through a pretreatment CBCT. The predicted scatter component was added to the primary attenuation component to give the full predicted in vivo EPID image. We acquired 193 IMRT fields/images from 93 patients treated on the Varian Halcyon. Model training:validation:test dataset ratios were 133:20:40 images. Additional patient plans were delivered to anthropomorphic phantoms, yielding 75 images for further validation. We assessed model accuracy by comparing model-calculated and measured in vivo images with a gamma comparison.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Comparing the model-calculated and measured in vivo images gives a mean gamma pass rate for the training:validation:test datasets of 95.4%:94.1%:92.9% for 3%/3 mm and 98.4%:98.4%:96.8% for 5%/3 mm. For images delivered to phantom data sets the average gamma pass rate was 96.4% (3%/3 mm criteria). In all data sets, the lower passing rates of some images were due to CBCT artifacts and patient motion that occurred between the time of CBCT and treatment. </p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The developed deep-learning-based model can generate in vivo EPID images with a mean gamma pass rate greater than 92% (3%/3 mm criteria). This approach provides an alternative to MC prediction algorithms. Image predictions can be made in 30 ms on a standard GPU. In future work, image predictions from this model can be used to detect in vivo treatment errors and on-treatment changes in patient anatomy, providing an additional layer of patient-specific quality assurance.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18384,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":"52 2","pages":"1058-1069"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.17549","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The electronic portal imaging device (EPID) can be used in vivo, to detect on-treatment errors by evaluating radiation exiting a patient. To detect deviations from the planning intent, image predictions need to be modeled based on the patient's anatomy and plan information. To date in vivo transit images have been predicted using Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms. A deep learning approach can make predictions faster than MC and only requires patient information for training.

Purpose

To test the feasibility and reliability of creating a deep-learning model with patient data for predicting in vivo EPID images for IMRT treatments.

Methods

In our approach, the in vivo EPID image was separated into contributions from primary and scattered photons. A primary photon attenuation function was determined by measuring attenuation factors for various thicknesses of solid water. The scatter component of in vivo EPID images was estimated using a convolutional neural network (CNN). The CNN input was a 3-channel image comprised of the non-transit EPID image and ray tracing projections through a pretreatment CBCT. The predicted scatter component was added to the primary attenuation component to give the full predicted in vivo EPID image. We acquired 193 IMRT fields/images from 93 patients treated on the Varian Halcyon. Model training:validation:test dataset ratios were 133:20:40 images. Additional patient plans were delivered to anthropomorphic phantoms, yielding 75 images for further validation. We assessed model accuracy by comparing model-calculated and measured in vivo images with a gamma comparison.

Results

Comparing the model-calculated and measured in vivo images gives a mean gamma pass rate for the training:validation:test datasets of 95.4%:94.1%:92.9% for 3%/3 mm and 98.4%:98.4%:96.8% for 5%/3 mm. For images delivered to phantom data sets the average gamma pass rate was 96.4% (3%/3 mm criteria). In all data sets, the lower passing rates of some images were due to CBCT artifacts and patient motion that occurred between the time of CBCT and treatment. 

Conclusions

The developed deep-learning-based model can generate in vivo EPID images with a mean gamma pass rate greater than 92% (3%/3 mm criteria). This approach provides an alternative to MC prediction algorithms. Image predictions can be made in 30 ms on a standard GPU. In future work, image predictions from this model can be used to detect in vivo treatment errors and on-treatment changes in patient anatomy, providing an additional layer of patient-specific quality assurance.

利用分析计算衰减和人工智能预测散射相结合的方法,快速预测体内 EPID 图像。
背景:电子门户成像设备(EPID)可在体内使用,通过评估从患者体内排出的辐射来检测治疗误差。为了检测与计划意图的偏差,需要根据患者的解剖结构和计划信息对图像预测进行建模。迄今为止,体内转运图像一直使用蒙特卡洛(MC)算法进行预测。目的:测试利用患者数据创建深度学习模型的可行性和可靠性,以预测 IMRT 治疗的活体 EPID 图像:在我们的方法中,体内 EPID 图像被分为原生光子和散射光子。通过测量不同厚度固体水的衰减系数,确定原生光子衰减函数。使用卷积神经网络(CNN)估算了活体 EPID 图像的散射成分。卷积神经网络的输入是由非移动 EPID 图像和通过预处理 CBCT 的射线追踪投影组成的 3 通道图像。预测的散射分量被添加到主衰减分量中,从而得到完整的预测体内 EPID 图像。我们获得了在瓦里安 Halcyon 上接受治疗的 93 位患者的 193 个 IMRT 场/图像。模型训练:验证:测试数据集的比例为 133:20:40 张图像。我们还将其他患者的计划传送到拟人化模型上,得到了 75 幅用于进一步验证的图像。我们通过伽马比较法对模型计算图像和测量的活体图像进行比较,以评估模型的准确性:结果:比较模型计算图像和测量的活体图像,训练:验证:测试数据集的平均伽马通过率分别为:3%/3 毫米 95.4%:94.1%:92.9%;5%/3 毫米 98.4%:98.4%:96.8%。在幻影数据集的图像中,伽马平均通过率为 96.4%(3%/3 毫米标准)。在所有数据集中,一些图像的通过率较低是由于 CBCT 伪影和患者在 CBCT 和治疗之间的移动造成的。 结论:所开发的基于深度学习的模型可以生成平均伽马通过率超过 92% (3%/3 mm 标准)的活体 EPID 图像。这种方法可替代 MC 预测算法。图像预测可在标准 GPU 上在 30 毫秒内完成。在未来的工作中,该模型的图像预测可用于检测体内治疗误差和治疗中患者解剖结构的变化,从而提供额外的患者特定质量保证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical physics
Medical physics 医学-核医学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Medical Physics publishes original, high impact physics, imaging science, and engineering research that advances patient diagnosis and therapy through contributions in 1) Basic science developments with high potential for clinical translation 2) Clinical applications of cutting edge engineering and physics innovations 3) Broadly applicable and innovative clinical physics developments Medical Physics is a journal of global scope and reach. By publishing in Medical Physics your research will reach an international, multidisciplinary audience including practicing medical physicists as well as physics- and engineering based translational scientists. We work closely with authors of promising articles to improve their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信