Conversions in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multicentric analysis of 2549 cases.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Olga Katzendorn, Frank Schiefelbein, Georg Schoen, Clemens Wiesinger, Jacob Pfuner, Burkhard Ubrig, Simon Gloger, Daniar Osmonov, Ahmed Eraky, Christian Wagner, Abdirahman Ayanle, Mulham Al-Nadar, Claudia Kesch, Boris A Hadaschik, Pouriya Faraj Tabrizi, Mathias Wolters, Markus A Kuczyk, Stefan Siemer, Michael Stoeckle, Philip Zeuschner, Nina N Harke
{"title":"Conversions in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multicentric analysis of 2549 cases.","authors":"Olga Katzendorn, Frank Schiefelbein, Georg Schoen, Clemens Wiesinger, Jacob Pfuner, Burkhard Ubrig, Simon Gloger, Daniar Osmonov, Ahmed Eraky, Christian Wagner, Abdirahman Ayanle, Mulham Al-Nadar, Claudia Kesch, Boris A Hadaschik, Pouriya Faraj Tabrizi, Mathias Wolters, Markus A Kuczyk, Stefan Siemer, Michael Stoeckle, Philip Zeuschner, Nina N Harke","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.06018-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conversion in partial nephrectomy to radical nephrectomy occurs in 1-5%. This analysis assessed predictors for conversions in robot-assisted partial nephrectomies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two thousand five hundred forty-nine patients at eight robotic centers for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Intervention was performed by 25 surgeons with varying expertise. Conversion was defined as change from robot-assisted partial nephrectomy to open partial, open radical or robot-assisted radical nephrectomy. Comparative analyses between converted and non-converted cases and within subgroups as well as multivariate regression analyses for predictors for conversion were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-eight (3.5%) conversions were documented (17% open nephrectomy, 53% open partial nephrectomy, 30% robot-assisted nephrectomy). In case of conversion, patients were significantly older (P<0.001) with a higher Body Mass Index (BMI; P=0.029), larger tumor size (P<0.001), multiple tumors (P<0.001) and higher PADUA scores (P<0.001). Converting surgeons had a significantly lower experience in RAPN (median EXP 64 vs. 29, P<0.001). The main reasons to convert were unfavorable anatomic features (69%). Radical nephrectomy occurred more frequently in tumors with higher PADUA Score (P<0.001). Experienced surgeons in open renal surgery performed more often open partial nephrectomy in case of open conversion (P<0.001). Patients' age, BMI, surgeon's expertise, number of tumors, tumor size and PADUA Score were independent predictors for conversion (P<0.001). Limitations are the retrospective study design and short-term follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Conversions in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy are predominantly determined by patient- and tumor-related factors, but also surgical experience. Intensified surgical training might reduce the risk of conversions with an increased chance for nephron-sparing surgery in converted cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.24.06018-X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Conversion in partial nephrectomy to radical nephrectomy occurs in 1-5%. This analysis assessed predictors for conversions in robot-assisted partial nephrectomies.

Methods: Two thousand five hundred forty-nine patients at eight robotic centers for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Intervention was performed by 25 surgeons with varying expertise. Conversion was defined as change from robot-assisted partial nephrectomy to open partial, open radical or robot-assisted radical nephrectomy. Comparative analyses between converted and non-converted cases and within subgroups as well as multivariate regression analyses for predictors for conversion were performed.

Results: Eighty-eight (3.5%) conversions were documented (17% open nephrectomy, 53% open partial nephrectomy, 30% robot-assisted nephrectomy). In case of conversion, patients were significantly older (P<0.001) with a higher Body Mass Index (BMI; P=0.029), larger tumor size (P<0.001), multiple tumors (P<0.001) and higher PADUA scores (P<0.001). Converting surgeons had a significantly lower experience in RAPN (median EXP 64 vs. 29, P<0.001). The main reasons to convert were unfavorable anatomic features (69%). Radical nephrectomy occurred more frequently in tumors with higher PADUA Score (P<0.001). Experienced surgeons in open renal surgery performed more often open partial nephrectomy in case of open conversion (P<0.001). Patients' age, BMI, surgeon's expertise, number of tumors, tumor size and PADUA Score were independent predictors for conversion (P<0.001). Limitations are the retrospective study design and short-term follow-up.

Conclusions: Conversions in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy are predominantly determined by patient- and tumor-related factors, but also surgical experience. Intensified surgical training might reduce the risk of conversions with an increased chance for nephron-sparing surgery in converted cases.

机器人辅助肾部分切除术中的转换:对2549例病例的多中心分析。
背景:肾部分切除术转化为根治性肾切除术的发生率为1-5%。本分析评估了机器人辅助肾部分切除术中的转换预测因素:方法:对在八个机器人中心接受机器人辅助肾部分切除术的 2549 名患者进行了回顾性分析。25名外科医生进行了干预,他们的专业技能各不相同。转换的定义是从机器人辅助肾部分切除术改为开放式肾部分切除术、开放式根治术或机器人辅助根治性肾切除术。对已转归和未转归病例进行比较分析,并在亚组内进行比较分析,同时对转归的预测因素进行多变量回归分析:记录了88例(3.5%)转换病例(17%为开放性肾切除术,53%为开放性肾部分切除术,30%为机器人辅助肾切除术)。转换手术的患者年龄明显偏大(PConclusions:机器人辅助肾部分切除术中的转归主要取决于患者和肿瘤相关因素,也取决于手术经验。加强手术培训可降低转换风险,增加转换病例中保留肾脏手术的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva Urology and Nephrology
Minerva Urology and Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
32.70%
发文量
237
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信