Mechanical studies for the rotational stability of a cemented stem in cases with stem anteversion adjustment in the cement mantle.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Ariha Goshi, Yu Takeda, Takuya Nakai, Shigeo Fukunishi
{"title":"Mechanical studies for the rotational stability of a cemented stem in cases with stem anteversion adjustment in the cement mantle.","authors":"Ariha Goshi, Yu Takeda, Takuya Nakai, Shigeo Fukunishi","doi":"10.1016/j.jos.2024.10.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The cemented stem can accommodate various shapes of femurs and is a stable stem with long-term results. Additionally, the cemented stem is a highly versatile stem that can be used to adjust stem anteversion in patients with variable femoral anteversion. On the other hand, rotating a stem with increasing cement viscosity may result in reduced postoperative rotational stability.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Rotational stability was compared using two different cementing techniques via in vitro models. Six stems in Group S (Static) were inserted and fixed until the cement was completely hardened. Six stems in Group R (Rotation) were inserted and then rotated 15° before the cement had fully cured. After the cement had completely set, a static rotation testing was performed in which the stem was rotated at a rate of 1°/sec to 20° while a vertical load of 600 N was applied. For the dynamic testing, a vertical load of 600 N and 10,000 cycles of repetitive rotation were applied at 10° around the stem axis at 0.1 Hz. After 10,000 cycles, maximum torque was compared between Groups S and R.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both groups, the torque value increased proportionally to the rotation angle. There were no significant differences in resistance to static rotation between Groups S and R (P = 0.599). In the dynamic testing, there was no significant difference between Groups S and R in both minimum torque and maximum torque in any of the cycles. There were no differences in the rotational torque between Groups S and R at 10,000 cycles (P = 0.693).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The rotational stability of the cemented stems did not decrease in vitro when stem version control was performed up to 15° before the cement had completely hardened.</p>","PeriodicalId":16939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2024.10.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The cemented stem can accommodate various shapes of femurs and is a stable stem with long-term results. Additionally, the cemented stem is a highly versatile stem that can be used to adjust stem anteversion in patients with variable femoral anteversion. On the other hand, rotating a stem with increasing cement viscosity may result in reduced postoperative rotational stability.

Materials and methods: Rotational stability was compared using two different cementing techniques via in vitro models. Six stems in Group S (Static) were inserted and fixed until the cement was completely hardened. Six stems in Group R (Rotation) were inserted and then rotated 15° before the cement had fully cured. After the cement had completely set, a static rotation testing was performed in which the stem was rotated at a rate of 1°/sec to 20° while a vertical load of 600 N was applied. For the dynamic testing, a vertical load of 600 N and 10,000 cycles of repetitive rotation were applied at 10° around the stem axis at 0.1 Hz. After 10,000 cycles, maximum torque was compared between Groups S and R.

Results: In both groups, the torque value increased proportionally to the rotation angle. There were no significant differences in resistance to static rotation between Groups S and R (P = 0.599). In the dynamic testing, there was no significant difference between Groups S and R in both minimum torque and maximum torque in any of the cycles. There were no differences in the rotational torque between Groups S and R at 10,000 cycles (P = 0.693).

Conclusions: The rotational stability of the cemented stems did not decrease in vitro when stem version control was performed up to 15° before the cement had completely hardened.

对在骨水泥套内调整骨水泥柄反转的病例中骨水泥柄旋转稳定性的机械研究。
简介骨水泥柄可适应各种形状的股骨,是一种长期效果稳定的柄。此外,骨水泥柄是一种通用性很强的柄,可用于调整股骨内翻可变患者的柄内翻。另一方面,随着骨水泥粘度的增加,旋转骨干可能会导致术后旋转稳定性降低:通过体外模型,使用两种不同的骨水泥技术比较旋转稳定性。插入S组(静态)的六根骨干并固定至骨水泥完全硬化。插入 R 组(旋转)的六根骨干,然后在骨水泥完全固化前旋转 15°。在骨水泥完全固化后,进行静态旋转测试,以每秒 1° 的速度将骨柄旋转 20°,同时施加 600 牛的垂直荷载。在动态测试中,施加 600 N 的垂直负载,并以 0.1 Hz 的频率绕阀杆轴线 10° 重复旋转 10,000 次。10,000 个周期后,比较 S 组和 R 组的最大扭矩:结果:两组的扭矩值均随旋转角度成比例增加。S 组和 R 组的静态旋转阻力无明显差异(P = 0.599)。在动态测试中,S 组和 R 组在任何循环中的最小扭矩和最大扭矩均无明显差异。在 10,000 次循环中,S 组和 R 组的旋转扭矩没有差异(P = 0.693):结论:在骨水泥完全硬化之前,对骨水泥柄进行高达15°的版本控制时,骨水泥柄的体外旋转稳定性并没有降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Science
Journal of Orthopaedic Science 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Science is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The journal publishes the latest researches and topical debates in all fields of clinical and experimental orthopaedics, including musculoskeletal medicine, sports medicine, locomotive syndrome, trauma, paediatrics, oncology and biomaterials, as well as basic researches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信