Integrating asthma care guidelines into primary care electronic medical records: a review focused on Canadian knowledge translation tools.

IF 9 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
European Respiratory Review Pub Date : 2024-11-27 Print Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1183/16000617.0247-2023
Matheson McFarlane, Alison Morra, M Diane Lougheed
{"title":"Integrating asthma care guidelines into primary care electronic medical records: a review focused on Canadian knowledge translation tools.","authors":"Matheson McFarlane, Alison Morra, M Diane Lougheed","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0247-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Asthma is one of the most common chronic respiratory diseases globally. Despite national and international asthma care guidelines, gaps persist in primary care. Knowledge translation (KT) electronic tools (eTools) exist aiming to address these gaps, but their impact on practice patterns and patient outcomes is variable. We aimed to conduct a nonsystematic review of the literature for key asthma care gaps and identify limitations and future directions of KT eTools optimised for use in electronic medical records (EMRs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The database OVID Medline was searched (1999-2024) using keywords such as asthma, KT, primary healthcare and EMRs. Primary research articles, systematic reviews and published international/national guidelines were included. Findings were interpreted within the knowledge-to-action framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key asthma care gaps in primary care include under-recognition of suboptimal control, underutilisation of pulmonary function tests, barriers to care delivery, provider attitudes/beliefs, limited access to asthma education and referral to asthma specialists. Various KT eTools have been validated, many with optimisation for use in EMRs. KT eTools within EMRs have been a recent focus, including asthma management systems, decision support algorithms, data standards initiatives and asthma case definition validation for EMRs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The knowledge-to-action cycle is a valuable framework for developing and implementing novel KT tools. Future research should integrate end-users into the process of KT tool development to improve the perceived utility of these tools. Additionally, the priorities of primary care physicians should be considered in future KT tool research to improve end-user uptake and overall asthma management practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"33 174","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11600127/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Respiratory Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0247-2023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Asthma is one of the most common chronic respiratory diseases globally. Despite national and international asthma care guidelines, gaps persist in primary care. Knowledge translation (KT) electronic tools (eTools) exist aiming to address these gaps, but their impact on practice patterns and patient outcomes is variable. We aimed to conduct a nonsystematic review of the literature for key asthma care gaps and identify limitations and future directions of KT eTools optimised for use in electronic medical records (EMRs).

Methods: The database OVID Medline was searched (1999-2024) using keywords such as asthma, KT, primary healthcare and EMRs. Primary research articles, systematic reviews and published international/national guidelines were included. Findings were interpreted within the knowledge-to-action framework.

Results: Key asthma care gaps in primary care include under-recognition of suboptimal control, underutilisation of pulmonary function tests, barriers to care delivery, provider attitudes/beliefs, limited access to asthma education and referral to asthma specialists. Various KT eTools have been validated, many with optimisation for use in EMRs. KT eTools within EMRs have been a recent focus, including asthma management systems, decision support algorithms, data standards initiatives and asthma case definition validation for EMRs.

Conclusions: The knowledge-to-action cycle is a valuable framework for developing and implementing novel KT tools. Future research should integrate end-users into the process of KT tool development to improve the perceived utility of these tools. Additionally, the priorities of primary care physicians should be considered in future KT tool research to improve end-user uptake and overall asthma management practices.

将哮喘护理指南纳入初级保健电子病历:以加拿大知识转化工具为重点的综述。
引言哮喘是全球最常见的慢性呼吸道疾病之一。尽管制定了国家和国际哮喘护理指南,但在初级护理方面仍存在差距。现有的知识转化(KT)电子工具(eTools)旨在弥补这些不足,但它们对实践模式和患者疗效的影响各不相同。我们的目的是针对哮喘护理方面的主要差距进行一次非系统性的文献综述,并确定优化用于电子病历(EMR)的知识转化电子工具的局限性和未来发展方向:方法:使用哮喘、KT、初级医疗保健和 EMRs 等关键词搜索数据库 OVID Medline(1999-2024 年)。其中包括初级研究文章、系统综述和已出版的国际/国家指南。研究结果在 "从知识到行动 "框架内进行解释:结果:初级医疗中存在的主要哮喘护理差距包括:对未达到最佳控制水平的认识不足、肺功能测试使用不足、提供护理的障碍、提供者的态度/信念、获得哮喘教育和转诊至哮喘专科医生的机会有限。各种 KT 电子工具已通过验证,其中许多已优化用于 EMR。EMR 中的 KT 电子工具是近期的重点,包括哮喘管理系统、决策支持算法、数据标准倡议和 EMR 的哮喘病例定义验证:知识到行动的循环是开发和实施新型知识共享工具的重要框架。未来的研究应将最终用户纳入 KT 工具的开发过程,以提高这些工具的实用性。此外,在未来的 KT 工具研究中应考虑初级保健医生的优先事项,以提高最终用户的接受程度和整体哮喘管理实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Respiratory Review
European Respiratory Review Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
1.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Respiratory Review (ERR) is an open-access journal published by the European Respiratory Society (ERS), serving as a vital resource for respiratory professionals by delivering updates on medicine, science, and surgery in the field. ERR features state-of-the-art review articles, editorials, correspondence, and summaries of recent research findings and studies covering a wide range of topics including COPD, asthma, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung disease, lung cancer, tuberculosis, and pulmonary infections. Articles are published continuously and compiled into quarterly issues within a single annual volume.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信