Radiation Lobectomy in Adjunct to Double Vein Embolization to Reach Sufficient Future Liver Remnant in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: A Case Series.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
D Andel, K Ramdhani, A J A T Braat, R C G Bruijnen, G Bol, G Keane, M G E H Lam, O W Kranenburg, I H M Borel Rinkes, J Hagendoorn, M L J Smits
{"title":"Radiation Lobectomy in Adjunct to Double Vein Embolization to Reach Sufficient Future Liver Remnant in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: A Case Series.","authors":"D Andel, K Ramdhani, A J A T Braat, R C G Bruijnen, G Bol, G Keane, M G E H Lam, O W Kranenburg, I H M Borel Rinkes, J Hagendoorn, M L J Smits","doi":"10.1007/s00270-024-03892-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the outcome of radiation lobectomy (RL) after double vein embolization (portal vein embolization + hepatic vein embolization) for patients with insufficient future liver remnant growth.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>All patients with insufficient FLR function (as determined by hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HIDA); < 2.7%/min/m<sup>2</sup>) after double vein embolization who underwent RL between 2020 and 2023 were selected. Follow-up consisted of toxicity graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v. 5.0 criteria, HIDA and computed tomography imaging at 1-2-month intervals to assess treatment effect and resectability. Postoperative complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five patients with colorectal liver metastases were selected. After RL, 4/5 patients had sufficient FLR function. Overall, the median volumetric and functional increase of the FLR was 47.5% (range 5.8-102.8%) and 66.7% (range 0-233.3%), respectively, and within a median of 81 days. No severe toxicities were reported after adjunct RL. Two patients did not undergo surgery due to disease progression. Three patients underwent surgery. The postoperative stay was complicated by persistent bile leakage in one patient and respiratory insufficiency in another. There was no 90-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RL was safely employed in adjunct to double vein embolization to induce a further increase in the FLR volume and function.</p>","PeriodicalId":9591,"journal":{"name":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"379-385"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-024-03892-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the outcome of radiation lobectomy (RL) after double vein embolization (portal vein embolization + hepatic vein embolization) for patients with insufficient future liver remnant growth.

Materials and methods: All patients with insufficient FLR function (as determined by hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HIDA); < 2.7%/min/m2) after double vein embolization who underwent RL between 2020 and 2023 were selected. Follow-up consisted of toxicity graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v. 5.0 criteria, HIDA and computed tomography imaging at 1-2-month intervals to assess treatment effect and resectability. Postoperative complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo system.

Results: Five patients with colorectal liver metastases were selected. After RL, 4/5 patients had sufficient FLR function. Overall, the median volumetric and functional increase of the FLR was 47.5% (range 5.8-102.8%) and 66.7% (range 0-233.3%), respectively, and within a median of 81 days. No severe toxicities were reported after adjunct RL. Two patients did not undergo surgery due to disease progression. Three patients underwent surgery. The postoperative stay was complicated by persistent bile leakage in one patient and respiratory insufficiency in another. There was no 90-day mortality.

Conclusion: RL was safely employed in adjunct to double vein embolization to induce a further increase in the FLR volume and function.

大肠癌肝转移患者在双静脉栓塞术辅助下进行放射叶切除术以获得足够的未来肝脏残留:病例系列。
目的:描述双静脉栓塞(门静脉栓塞+肝静脉栓塞)后放射肝叶切除术(RL)对未来残肝生长不足患者的治疗效果:选取所有在2020年至2023年期间接受RL的双静脉栓塞术后FLR功能不足(由肝胆闪烁扫描(HIDA)确定;2)的患者。随访包括根据《不良事件通用术语标准》v.5.0 标准进行毒性分级,每隔 1-2 个月进行一次 HIDA 和计算机断层扫描成像,以评估治疗效果和可切除性。术后并发症按照Clavien-Dindo系统进行分级:结果:选择了五例结直肠肝转移患者。RL术后,4/5的患者有足够的FLR功能。总体而言,在中位数81天内,FLR的体积和功能增加的中位数分别为47.5%(范围5.8-102.8%)和66.7%(范围0-233.3%)。辅助 RL 后未报告严重毒性反应。两名患者因疾病进展未接受手术。三名患者接受了手术治疗。一名患者术后出现持续胆汁渗漏,另一名患者出现呼吸困难,导致术后住院情况复杂化。无 90 天死亡病例:结论:在双静脉栓塞术的基础上,RL可以安全地促使FLR容量和功能进一步增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
13.80%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology (CVIR) is the official journal of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, and is also the official organ of a number of additional distinguished national and international interventional radiological societies. CVIR publishes double blinded peer-reviewed original research work including clinical and laboratory investigations, technical notes, case reports, works in progress, and letters to the editor, as well as review articles, pictorial essays, editorials, and special invited submissions in the field of vascular and interventional radiology. Beside the communication of the latest research results in this field, it is also the aim of CVIR to support continuous medical education. Articles that are accepted for publication are done so with the understanding that they, or their substantive contents, have not been and will not be submitted to any other publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信