SHOW ME the evidence: Features of an approach to reliably deliver research evidence to those who need it

Abstract

The world is poised for a step-change improvement in how we use evidence to address societal challenges.

Given the speed at which plans are being made to support this once-in-a-generation transformation, the Implementation Council of the Global Commission on Evidence to Address Societal Challenges developed a working version of the features of an approach to reliably getting research evidence to those who need it and achieved consensus among leaders from the Implementation Council, as well as the Alliance for Living Evidence (Alive) Council and Evidence Synthesis International (ESI).

The 100+ contributing authors from across the ‘evidence synthesis and support’ world want to ensure that our future plans are firmly rooted in an agreed-upon summary of all that we have learned together over these past four or so years and to signal a mutual accountability among many of the key players involved in providing evidence support that we will each do our part in delivering on the promise that motivates these plans.

Given that much of the momentum for transformation is currently focused on living evidence syntheses and the infrastructure needed to support them, we give this form of evidence disproportionate focus here.

Actions speak louder than words. If we are to deliver on the promise of a step-change improvement in how we use evidence to address societal challenges, then each of us needs to do our part to put in place the features of an approach to reliably getting research evidence to those who need it. Funding can enable it. Coordination can facilitate it. Reporting can celebrate it (and shame a go-it-alone ethos). Evaluation of our approaches can support continuous improvement. But only our actions can make it happen.

You may already be doing great work. Please keep it up.

If you want to embrace a new approach and don't know where you can best fit in, check out the Global Evidence Commission's work in formalizing and strengthening national (and subnational) evidence support systems, enhancing and leveraging the global evidence architecture and putting evidence at the centre of everyday life. Or approach one of the Implementation Council members who you see doing exemplary work in your part of the world, in your type of role, in your sector, with your form of evidence or with an innovation like AI-powered living evidence synthesis or storytelling that draws on both research evidence and Indigenous ways of knowing.

John N. Lavis and Jeremy M. Grimshaw are co-leads of the Global Commission on Evidence to Address Societal Challenges. All authors are members of its Implementation Council. John N. Lavis is council chair, Ruth Stewart is director, Julian Elliott is treasurer and founder of the host entity and Will Moy is council member at the Alliance for Living Evidence (Alive). Jeremy M. Grimshaw is cochair and Ruth Stewart and Will Moy are members of the executive committee of Evidence Synthesis International. All authors are affiliated with its partner organizations. Ruth Stewart is a Fiduciary Officer for the South Africa Centre for Evidence. Jeremy M. Grimshaw is employed by the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute.

This editorial was commissioned based on a proposal by the authors and was peer-reviewed.