Empowering Trusted Messengers With Motivational Interviewing Skills: Improving Dissemination of Accurate Information to Communities.

Marie Ivantechenko, Shubarna Akhter, Damara Gutnick
{"title":"Empowering Trusted Messengers With Motivational Interviewing Skills: Improving Dissemination of Accurate Information to Communities.","authors":"Marie Ivantechenko, Shubarna Akhter, Damara Gutnick","doi":"10.1177/2752535X241304081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Historical injustices, structural racism, and negative healthcare experiences contribute to Black and Brown communities' distrust of science. Bridging Research, Accurate Information, and Dialogue (BRAID) is a community engagement model that leverages trusted messengers to share accurate, co-created health and science messages to their community through their social networks. In our prior research, trusted messengers reported encountering resistance or \"discord\" when conveying information about controversial topics such as COVID-19 vaccines and the importance of diversity in clinical trials. Motivational Interviewing (MI) is an evidence-based communication style widely practiced by healthcare providers to guide ambivalent patients toward behavior change. However, MI's application by community members, particularly trusted messengers, as a strategy for enhancing health message dissemination remains unexplored.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study used mixed methods to explore the feasibility of training trusted messengers in MI to support the dissemination of public health messages through social networks. Specifically, we sought to understand perspectives on learning MI and use of MI in conversations about clinical trial diversity and research subject protection.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>13 trusted messengers completed a MI introductory training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-five percent found the training highly valuable, 54% reported high self-efficacy, and 69% expressed a desire for additional training. Qualitative analysis revealed trusted messenger endorsement of MI, recognition of MI's applicability to various contexts, and a sense of empowerment to share accurate information to their communities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that empowering trusted messengers with communication skills can be a practical, feasible, and cost-effective public health strategy for effective dissemination of accurate public health messages.</p>","PeriodicalId":72648,"journal":{"name":"Community health equity research & policy","volume":" ","pages":"2752535X241304081"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community health equity research & policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2752535X241304081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Historical injustices, structural racism, and negative healthcare experiences contribute to Black and Brown communities' distrust of science. Bridging Research, Accurate Information, and Dialogue (BRAID) is a community engagement model that leverages trusted messengers to share accurate, co-created health and science messages to their community through their social networks. In our prior research, trusted messengers reported encountering resistance or "discord" when conveying information about controversial topics such as COVID-19 vaccines and the importance of diversity in clinical trials. Motivational Interviewing (MI) is an evidence-based communication style widely practiced by healthcare providers to guide ambivalent patients toward behavior change. However, MI's application by community members, particularly trusted messengers, as a strategy for enhancing health message dissemination remains unexplored.

Purpose: This study used mixed methods to explore the feasibility of training trusted messengers in MI to support the dissemination of public health messages through social networks. Specifically, we sought to understand perspectives on learning MI and use of MI in conversations about clinical trial diversity and research subject protection.

Research design: 13 trusted messengers completed a MI introductory training.

Results: Eighty-five percent found the training highly valuable, 54% reported high self-efficacy, and 69% expressed a desire for additional training. Qualitative analysis revealed trusted messenger endorsement of MI, recognition of MI's applicability to various contexts, and a sense of empowerment to share accurate information to their communities.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that empowering trusted messengers with communication skills can be a practical, feasible, and cost-effective public health strategy for effective dissemination of accurate public health messages.

用动机访谈技巧增强可信信使的能力:提高向社区传播准确信息的能力。
背景:历史上的不公正、结构性的种族主义以及负面的医疗保健经历导致了黑人和棕色人种对科学的不信任。衔接研究、准确信息和对话(BRAID)是一种社区参与模式,它利用可信信使通过他们的社交网络向他们的社区分享准确的、共同创造的健康和科学信息。在我们之前的研究中,可信信使报告称,在传达 COVID-19 疫苗和临床试验多样性的重要性等争议性话题的信息时遇到了阻力或 "不和谐"。动机访谈法(MI)是一种以证据为基础的沟通方式,被医疗服务提供者广泛用于引导矛盾的患者改变行为。目的:本研究采用混合方法探讨了对可信信使进行动机访谈培训以支持通过社交网络传播公共卫生信息的可行性。具体而言,我们试图了解学习多元智能的观点,以及在有关临床试验多样性和研究对象保护的对话中使用多元智能的情况。研究设计:13 名可信信使完成了多元智能入门培训:结果:85%的人认为培训很有价值,54%的人表示自我效能很高,69%的人表示希望接受更多培训。定性分析显示,可信信使认可多元智能,认识到多元智能适用于各种情况,并感到有能力向他们的社区分享准确的信息:我们的研究结果表明,增强受信任信使的沟通技能是一种实用、可行且具有成本效益的公共卫生策略,可有效传播准确的公共卫生信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信