{"title":"Conversion of Total Wrist Arthrodesis to a Total Wrist Arthroplasty: Twelve Patients Followed for 7 (2-16) Years.","authors":"Ole Reigstad, Trygve Holm-Glad, Johanne Korslund, Geir Gjelsten, Rasmus Thorkildsen, Magne Røkkum","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Total wrist arthroplasty has become a viable alternative to arthrodesis. Wrist arthrodesis is not necessarily the final surgery for many of the patients because some patients never accept the residual pain and reduced function that accompanies a stiff wrist. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance (pain, function, and satisfaction) of rearticulation, as well as the complications and reoperations of the procedure in a prospective unselected case series of patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve (7 men) patients with a mean age of 53 (42-67) years were converted to a total wrist arthroplasty at a mean of 8 (3-17) years after wrist arthrodesis. The patients had undergone 53 wrist surgeries prior to rearticulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One wrist with a periprosthetic fracture of the ulna and a loose distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty that had been removed during the conversion was finally fused a second time. At follow-up 7 (2-16) years after conversion, increased wrist active range of motion (0°-98°), supination (75°-85°), reduced Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score (56-30), and reduced visual analog scale pain scores were found. All arthroplasties were radiologically stable, well-fixed and osseointegrated. None regretted the surgery knowing the outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Conversion from total wrist arthrodesis to a modern wrist arthroplasty is feasible, yielding good functional results, significant pain relief, and stable implants.</p><p><strong>Type of study/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.10.007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Total wrist arthroplasty has become a viable alternative to arthrodesis. Wrist arthrodesis is not necessarily the final surgery for many of the patients because some patients never accept the residual pain and reduced function that accompanies a stiff wrist. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance (pain, function, and satisfaction) of rearticulation, as well as the complications and reoperations of the procedure in a prospective unselected case series of patients.
Methods: Twelve (7 men) patients with a mean age of 53 (42-67) years were converted to a total wrist arthroplasty at a mean of 8 (3-17) years after wrist arthrodesis. The patients had undergone 53 wrist surgeries prior to rearticulation.
Results: One wrist with a periprosthetic fracture of the ulna and a loose distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty that had been removed during the conversion was finally fused a second time. At follow-up 7 (2-16) years after conversion, increased wrist active range of motion (0°-98°), supination (75°-85°), reduced Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score (56-30), and reduced visual analog scale pain scores were found. All arthroplasties were radiologically stable, well-fixed and osseointegrated. None regretted the surgery knowing the outcome.
Conclusions: Conversion from total wrist arthrodesis to a modern wrist arthroplasty is feasible, yielding good functional results, significant pain relief, and stable implants.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.