Hadiza Ismaila, Ann Blandford, David Sunkersing, Fiona Stevenson, Henry Goodfellow
{"title":"Comparative insights into clinic onboarding and interaction practices for patient engagement in long COVID digital health care.","authors":"Hadiza Ismaila, Ann Blandford, David Sunkersing, Fiona Stevenson, Henry Goodfellow","doi":"10.1177/20552076241294101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study explores the influence of clinic-led onboarding and interaction processes on patient engagement within a digital health program for long COVID care, the Living with COVID Recovery (LWCR) program. We compared clinical practices and patient engagement levels across seven clinics utilising LWCR, gaining insights that could optimise digital health interventions (DHIs) for long COVID care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a mixed-methods approach, we conducted qualitative interviews with clinicians from seven clinics (out of thirty five) to understand their onboarding and interaction strategies for the LWCR program. We also performed a descriptive quantitative analysis of patient and clinic usage data to rank and classify patient engagement. These rankings were then compared against qualitative insights to explore the influence of clinic-led strategies on patient engagement. Additionally, we conducted interviews with 12 patients under the care of seven clinics to complement our mixed-method analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four key practices were identified in clinics with higher patient engagement: pre-assessment onboarding, proactive communication, patient education and the involvement of clinically experienced staff. Clinics that integrated these interdependent practices into a cohesive strategy demonstrated notably higher patient engagement levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the critical role of integrating multiple, interdependent clinic-led strategies to optimise patient engagement in DHIs, particularly for long COVID care. These findings provide actionable insights for healthcare providers and policymakers, suggesting that a comprehensive approach is essential for maximising patient engagement and improving care outcomes. The study lays the groundwork for future research to explore the broader applicability of these strategies across different healthcare contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":51333,"journal":{"name":"DIGITAL HEALTH","volume":"10 ","pages":"20552076241294101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590151/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIGITAL HEALTH","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241294101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study explores the influence of clinic-led onboarding and interaction processes on patient engagement within a digital health program for long COVID care, the Living with COVID Recovery (LWCR) program. We compared clinical practices and patient engagement levels across seven clinics utilising LWCR, gaining insights that could optimise digital health interventions (DHIs) for long COVID care.
Methods: Using a mixed-methods approach, we conducted qualitative interviews with clinicians from seven clinics (out of thirty five) to understand their onboarding and interaction strategies for the LWCR program. We also performed a descriptive quantitative analysis of patient and clinic usage data to rank and classify patient engagement. These rankings were then compared against qualitative insights to explore the influence of clinic-led strategies on patient engagement. Additionally, we conducted interviews with 12 patients under the care of seven clinics to complement our mixed-method analysis.
Results: Four key practices were identified in clinics with higher patient engagement: pre-assessment onboarding, proactive communication, patient education and the involvement of clinically experienced staff. Clinics that integrated these interdependent practices into a cohesive strategy demonstrated notably higher patient engagement levels.
Conclusion: This study highlights the critical role of integrating multiple, interdependent clinic-led strategies to optimise patient engagement in DHIs, particularly for long COVID care. These findings provide actionable insights for healthcare providers and policymakers, suggesting that a comprehensive approach is essential for maximising patient engagement and improving care outcomes. The study lays the groundwork for future research to explore the broader applicability of these strategies across different healthcare contexts.