Analysis of the center of pressure variables in women with migraine does not reflect differences in balance: A cross-sectional study.

IF 1.2 Q3 REHABILITATION
Fernando Imaz, Mauro Barone, Ignacio Lassaga, Laura Davidow, Carolina Mainella, Leonardo Intelangelo
{"title":"Analysis of the center of pressure variables in women with migraine does not reflect differences in balance: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Fernando Imaz, Mauro Barone, Ignacio Lassaga, Laura Davidow, Carolina Mainella, Leonardo Intelangelo","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.10.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Migraine is a neurological disease that affects proportionally more women. It has been documented that migraineurs often experience balance disturbances.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the balance between migraineur patients (MG) and healthy volunteers classified as control group (CG).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional study. Seventy-four women were evaluated: 37 MG and 37 CG. The evaluation of the center of pressure (COP) variables was carried out using a balance platform in three postures, bipodal eyes closed (BEC), right monopodal with eyes open (RMEO), and left monopodal with eyes open (LMEO). Self-report questionnaires (dizziness handicap inventory (DHI), fall risk efficacy scale (FES I), the functional impact scale (HIT 6) and the timed up and go test (TUG test) were used. The U-Mann Whitney test was used to verify differences in the COP between MG and CG. The Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA was used to analyze the differences between migraine groups (MGs) with postures, self-report questionnaires, and TUG test. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant changes were found in the balance variables, except the medial-lateral excursion variable in the BEC (p < 0.02) and LMEO (p = 0.04) postures. No significant differences were found between the MGs with HIT 6 (p = 0.48) or FES I (p = 0.49). Significant differences were found between the MGs with DHI (p = 0.003). The TUG test showed statistically significant changes between groups (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The women with migraine in this sample did not show differences in postural balance, however, dizziness and functional differences are shown compared to healthy women.</p>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"40 ","pages":"1852-1858"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.10.047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Migraine is a neurological disease that affects proportionally more women. It has been documented that migraineurs often experience balance disturbances.

Objective: To evaluate the balance between migraineur patients (MG) and healthy volunteers classified as control group (CG).

Method: A cross-sectional study. Seventy-four women were evaluated: 37 MG and 37 CG. The evaluation of the center of pressure (COP) variables was carried out using a balance platform in three postures, bipodal eyes closed (BEC), right monopodal with eyes open (RMEO), and left monopodal with eyes open (LMEO). Self-report questionnaires (dizziness handicap inventory (DHI), fall risk efficacy scale (FES I), the functional impact scale (HIT 6) and the timed up and go test (TUG test) were used. The U-Mann Whitney test was used to verify differences in the COP between MG and CG. The Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA was used to analyze the differences between migraine groups (MGs) with postures, self-report questionnaires, and TUG test. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: No statistically significant changes were found in the balance variables, except the medial-lateral excursion variable in the BEC (p < 0.02) and LMEO (p = 0.04) postures. No significant differences were found between the MGs with HIT 6 (p = 0.48) or FES I (p = 0.49). Significant differences were found between the MGs with DHI (p = 0.003). The TUG test showed statistically significant changes between groups (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: The women with migraine in this sample did not show differences in postural balance, however, dizziness and functional differences are shown compared to healthy women.

偏头痛女性患者的压力中心变量分析并不反映平衡方面的差异:一项横断面研究。
导言偏头痛是一种神经系统疾病,女性患者比例较高。有资料显示,偏头痛患者经常会出现平衡障碍:评估偏头痛患者(MG)和被列为对照组(CG)的健康志愿者之间的平衡能力:方法:横断面研究。对 74 名女性进行了评估:方法:横断面研究。压力中心(COP)变量的评估是使用平衡平台在三种姿势下进行的,即闭眼双脚站立(BEC)、睁眼右脚单脚站立(RMEO)和睁眼左脚单脚站立(LMEO)。采用自我报告问卷(头晕障碍量表(DHI)、跌倒风险效能量表(FES I)、功能影响量表(HIT 6)和定时起立行走测试(TUG 测试))。采用 U-Mann Whitney 检验来验证 MG 和 CG 之间 COP 的差异。Kruskal-Wallis 单因素方差分析用于分析偏头痛组(MGs)在姿势、自我报告问卷和 TUG 测试方面的差异。A p 结果:除 BEC 中的内侧-外侧偏移变量外,其他平衡变量均未发现有统计学意义的变化(P 结论:偏头痛女性患者的平衡能力与偏头痛男性患者相比有明显差异:本样本中患有偏头痛的女性在姿势平衡方面没有表现出差异,但与健康女性相比,在头晕和功能方面存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信