Effects of White Noise and Therapeutic Touch on Pain and Comfort in Newborns during Heel Lance: A Randomized Controlled Study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Advances in Neonatal Care Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1097/ANC.0000000000001200
Duygu Deniz Erol, Gülçin Özalp Gerçeker
{"title":"Effects of White Noise and Therapeutic Touch on Pain and Comfort in Newborns during Heel Lance: A Randomized Controlled Study.","authors":"Duygu Deniz Erol, Gülçin Özalp Gerçeker","doi":"10.1097/ANC.0000000000001200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nonpharmacological methods such as white noise and therapeutic touch can be used in pain management in neonates.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This randomized controlled study evaluated the effects of white noise and therapeutic touch during heel lance procedures on pain, comfort levels, and physiological parameters in healthy neonates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This parallel, randomized controlled study was conducted in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Service of a regional hospital. The sample comprised 160 neonates with gestational ages of >35 weeks randomly assigned to 4 groups (white noise [WN], therapeutic touch [TT], white noise + therapeutic touch [WT], and control [CG] group). Pain and comfort levels were evaluated according to the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale, and the COMFORTneo Scale. The primary outcomes were pain and comfort levels, and the secondary outcomes were heart rate and SpO2 levels. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the scale scores among groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant differences among groups in terms of Neonatal Infant Pain Scale and COMFORTneo scores (P < .05). The pain scores for the white noise, therapeutic touch, and white noise + therapeutic touch groups were 4.2 ± 2.0, 5.2 ± 1.6, and 3.3 ± 1.7, respectively. There was a significant difference in average heart rate during the heel lance procedure among the groups (P < .05). Pain scores of the intervention groups were lower compared to the control group.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice and research: </strong>The combination of white noise and therapeutic touch was more effective in reducing pain and increasing comfort levels. Nurses could reduce procedural pain by applying these pain relief methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":48862,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Neonatal Care","volume":"24 6","pages":"E79-E87"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Neonatal Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000001200","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nonpharmacological methods such as white noise and therapeutic touch can be used in pain management in neonates.

Purpose: This randomized controlled study evaluated the effects of white noise and therapeutic touch during heel lance procedures on pain, comfort levels, and physiological parameters in healthy neonates.

Methods: This parallel, randomized controlled study was conducted in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Service of a regional hospital. The sample comprised 160 neonates with gestational ages of >35 weeks randomly assigned to 4 groups (white noise [WN], therapeutic touch [TT], white noise + therapeutic touch [WT], and control [CG] group). Pain and comfort levels were evaluated according to the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale, and the COMFORTneo Scale. The primary outcomes were pain and comfort levels, and the secondary outcomes were heart rate and SpO2 levels. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the scale scores among groups.

Results: There were significant differences among groups in terms of Neonatal Infant Pain Scale and COMFORTneo scores (P < .05). The pain scores for the white noise, therapeutic touch, and white noise + therapeutic touch groups were 4.2 ± 2.0, 5.2 ± 1.6, and 3.3 ± 1.7, respectively. There was a significant difference in average heart rate during the heel lance procedure among the groups (P < .05). Pain scores of the intervention groups were lower compared to the control group.

Implications for practice and research: The combination of white noise and therapeutic touch was more effective in reducing pain and increasing comfort levels. Nurses could reduce procedural pain by applying these pain relief methods.

白噪音和治疗性抚触对新生儿足跟隆起时疼痛和舒适感的影响:随机对照研究
背景:目的:本随机对照研究评估了跟骨穿刺过程中白色噪音和治疗性触摸对健康新生儿疼痛、舒适度和生理参数的影响:这项平行随机对照研究在一家地区医院的妇产科进行。样本包括 160 名胎龄大于 35 周的新生儿,随机分配到 4 个组(白噪音组 [WN]、治疗性抚触组 [TT]、白噪音 + 治疗性抚触组 [WT] 和对照组 [CG])。疼痛和舒适程度根据新生儿婴儿疼痛量表和 COMFORTneo 量表进行评估。主要结果为疼痛和舒适度,次要结果为心率和 SpO2 水平。采用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验比较各组的量表得分:结果:在新生儿婴儿疼痛量表和 COMFORTneo 评分方面,各组之间存在明显差异(P 对实践和研究的意义):白噪音和治疗性抚触的结合在减轻疼痛和提高舒适度方面更为有效。护士可以通过应用这些止痛方法减轻手术疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Advances in Neonatal Care takes a unique and dynamic approach to the original research and clinical practice articles it publishes. Addressing the practice challenges faced every day—caring for the 40,000-plus low-birth-weight infants in Level II and Level III NICUs each year—the journal promotes evidence-based care and improved outcomes for the tiniest patients and their families. Peer-reviewed editorial includes unique and detailed visual and teaching aids, such as Family Teaching Toolbox, Research to Practice, Cultivating Clinical Expertise, and Online Features. Each issue offers Continuing Education (CE) articles in both print and online formats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信