Lower accuracy of estimated delivery date using last menstrual period recall and related factors of adverse events during childbirth: A sub-analysis of a birth cohort study in Makassar, Indonesia.

IF 1.1 Q3 NURSING
Belitung Nursing Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.33546/bnj.3590
Eri Wijaya, Ansariadi, Veni Hadju, Rizalinda Sjahril, Asri C Adisasmita, Anwar Mallongi, Stang
{"title":"Lower accuracy of estimated delivery date using last menstrual period recall and related factors of adverse events during childbirth: A sub-analysis of a birth cohort study in Makassar, Indonesia.","authors":"Eri Wijaya, Ansariadi, Veni Hadju, Rizalinda Sjahril, Asri C Adisasmita, Anwar Mallongi, Stang","doi":"10.33546/bnj.3590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early pregnancy ultrasound provides a more accurate estimate of the estimated delivery date (EDD) than the last menstrual period (LMP). However, LMP-based EDD calculation remains common in resource-limited settings. Inaccurate EDDs can contribute to adverse birth outcomes. However, research examining the accuracy of LMP-based EDDs and their association with delivery-related adverse events is limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of self-reported LMP in predicting EDD and its association with adverse events during delivery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were analyzed from 171 pregnant women participating in the Indonesian Birth Cohort Study based in Makassar, Indonesia. This study utilized a prospective cohort design, employing descriptive statistics and Poisson regression analysis in Stata. Adverse events were defined as any unexpected negative occurrence during delivery, including issues related to healthcare access, birth attendance, and the medical condition of the mother and newborn.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mode of delivery and categorized differences between actual delivery date and estimated delivery date (ADD-EDD) were significantly associated with adverse events during delivery. Cesarean delivery was associated with a higher risk of adverse events compared to vaginal birth (Adjusted Risk Ratio [ARR] 1.11, 95% CI: 1.02-1.22, <i>p</i> <0.001). Additionally, ADD-EDD differences of ≤-15 days (ARR 1.49, 95% CI: 1.35-1.65), -14 to -8 days (ARR 1.33, 95% CI: 1.19-1.49), and ≥15 days (ARR 1.37, 95% CI: 1.20-1.58) showed an increased risk (all <i>p</i> <0.001). An ADD-EDD difference of 8 to 14 days was marginally significant (ARR 1.20, 95% CI: 1.00-1.44, <i>p</i> = 0.046). The ADD-EDD distribution showed notable gaps, with ADD deviations occurring as early as 109 days before and as late as 45 days after the EDD. On average, the ADD occurred approximately one week earlier (-7.15 days) than the EDD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lower accuracy of LMP-based EDDs and delivery mode is associated with increased adverse events during delivery. Transitioning from LMP-based EDDs to more accurate methods is necessary to improve maternal and neonatal care outcomes. Integrating routine early ultrasound for EDD calculation can better equip healthcare providers and nurses to plan deliveries, reduce risks, and improve patient outcomes in resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":42002,"journal":{"name":"Belitung Nursing Journal","volume":"10 6","pages":"662-669"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11586618/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Belitung Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.3590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early pregnancy ultrasound provides a more accurate estimate of the estimated delivery date (EDD) than the last menstrual period (LMP). However, LMP-based EDD calculation remains common in resource-limited settings. Inaccurate EDDs can contribute to adverse birth outcomes. However, research examining the accuracy of LMP-based EDDs and their association with delivery-related adverse events is limited.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of self-reported LMP in predicting EDD and its association with adverse events during delivery.

Methods: Data were analyzed from 171 pregnant women participating in the Indonesian Birth Cohort Study based in Makassar, Indonesia. This study utilized a prospective cohort design, employing descriptive statistics and Poisson regression analysis in Stata. Adverse events were defined as any unexpected negative occurrence during delivery, including issues related to healthcare access, birth attendance, and the medical condition of the mother and newborn.

Results: Mode of delivery and categorized differences between actual delivery date and estimated delivery date (ADD-EDD) were significantly associated with adverse events during delivery. Cesarean delivery was associated with a higher risk of adverse events compared to vaginal birth (Adjusted Risk Ratio [ARR] 1.11, 95% CI: 1.02-1.22, p <0.001). Additionally, ADD-EDD differences of ≤-15 days (ARR 1.49, 95% CI: 1.35-1.65), -14 to -8 days (ARR 1.33, 95% CI: 1.19-1.49), and ≥15 days (ARR 1.37, 95% CI: 1.20-1.58) showed an increased risk (all p <0.001). An ADD-EDD difference of 8 to 14 days was marginally significant (ARR 1.20, 95% CI: 1.00-1.44, p = 0.046). The ADD-EDD distribution showed notable gaps, with ADD deviations occurring as early as 109 days before and as late as 45 days after the EDD. On average, the ADD occurred approximately one week earlier (-7.15 days) than the EDD.

Conclusion: Lower accuracy of LMP-based EDDs and delivery mode is associated with increased adverse events during delivery. Transitioning from LMP-based EDDs to more accurate methods is necessary to improve maternal and neonatal care outcomes. Integrating routine early ultrasound for EDD calculation can better equip healthcare providers and nurses to plan deliveries, reduce risks, and improve patient outcomes in resource-limited settings.

利用末次月经回忆估计分娩日期的准确性较低以及分娩期间不良事件的相关因素:印度尼西亚望加锡一项出生队列研究的子分析。
背景:与末次月经周期(LMP)相比,孕早期超声波能更准确地估计预产期(EDD)。然而,在资源有限的环境中,基于末次月经计算预产期的做法仍然很普遍。不准确的预产期可能会导致不良的分娩结局。然而,对基于 LMP 的 EDD 的准确性及其与分娩相关不良事件的关联性的研究却很有限:本研究旨在评估自我报告的 LMP 预测 EDD 的准确性及其与分娩不良事件的关联性:分析了171名参与印度尼西亚出生队列研究的孕妇的数据,该研究位于印度尼西亚望加锡。该研究采用前瞻性队列设计,使用 Stata 进行描述性统计和泊松回归分析。不良事件被定义为分娩过程中发生的任何意外负面事件,包括与医疗服务、分娩护理以及母亲和新生儿医疗状况相关的问题:结果:分娩方式和实际分娩日期与预计分娩日期之间的分类差异(ADD-EDD)与分娩过程中的不良事件显著相关。与阴道分娩相比,剖宫产发生不良事件的风险更高(调整风险比 [ARR] 1.11,95% CI:1.02-1.22,p p = 0.046)。ADD-EDD分布存在明显差距,ADD偏差最早出现在EDD前109天,最晚出现在EDD后45天。平均而言,ADD 比 EDD 早约一周(-7.15 天):结论:以 LMP 为基础的 EDD 和分娩模式的准确性较低与分娩期间不良事件的增加有关。为改善孕产妇和新生儿护理效果,有必要从基于 LMP 的 EDD 过渡到更准确的方法。在资源有限的环境中,将常规早期超声波纳入 EDD 计算可使医疗服务提供者和护士更好地制定分娩计划、降低风险并改善患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
42.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信