Effect of Transpancreatic Mattress Suture With Polyglycolic Acid Sheet in Pancreatic Stump Closure for the Prevention of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula in Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Yasuhiro Murata, Haruna Komatsubara, Daisuke Noguchi, Takahiro Ito, Aoi Hayasaki, Yusuke Iizawa, Takehiro Fujii, Akihiro Tanemura, Naohisa Kuriyama, Masashi Kishiwada, Shugo Mizuno
{"title":"Effect of Transpancreatic Mattress Suture With Polyglycolic Acid Sheet in Pancreatic Stump Closure for the Prevention of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula in Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy.","authors":"Yasuhiro Murata, Haruna Komatsubara, Daisuke Noguchi, Takahiro Ito, Aoi Hayasaki, Yusuke Iizawa, Takehiro Fujii, Akihiro Tanemura, Naohisa Kuriyama, Masashi Kishiwada, Shugo Mizuno","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pancreatic stump closure in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (DP) commonly utilizes staplers due to its simplicity; however, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains the most frequent complication. We have developed a novel stump closure technique using a transpancreatic mattress suture with a polyglycolic acid sheet (TP method) under robotic DP. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the TP method.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study included 145 cases of pure minimally invasive DP performed between February 2011 and July 2024: 34 robotic (R) and 97 laparoscopic (Lap). Surgical outcomes were compared across 3 groups based on the stump closure method: 18 cases using the TP method (TP group; R: 18), 22 with hand-sewn closure in a fish-mouth manner (FM group; Lap: 22), and 91 with a reinforced stapler (S group; R: 16, Lap: 75). Logistic regression analysis was employed to identify risk factors for POPF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>POPF occurred in 20 of 131 cases (grade B: 19, C: 1, 15.3%). The TP group exhibited the lowest POPF rate (TP vs FM vs S: 5.6% vs 27.3% vs 14.3%). Multivariate analysis identified pancreatic thickness ≥12 mm as an independent risk factor. For thickness <12 mm, no significant differences in POPF rates were observed (TP vs FM vs S: 0% vs 25.0% vs 5.6%). However, for thickness ≥12 mm, the TP group had a significantly lower POPF rate compared with the S group (TP vs FM vs S: 7.7% vs 28.6% vs 47.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TP method is superior to stapler closure in preventing POPF, especially in cases with pancreatic thickness of ≥12 mm.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001345","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Pancreatic stump closure in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (DP) commonly utilizes staplers due to its simplicity; however, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains the most frequent complication. We have developed a novel stump closure technique using a transpancreatic mattress suture with a polyglycolic acid sheet (TP method) under robotic DP. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the TP method.

Materials and methods: This study included 145 cases of pure minimally invasive DP performed between February 2011 and July 2024: 34 robotic (R) and 97 laparoscopic (Lap). Surgical outcomes were compared across 3 groups based on the stump closure method: 18 cases using the TP method (TP group; R: 18), 22 with hand-sewn closure in a fish-mouth manner (FM group; Lap: 22), and 91 with a reinforced stapler (S group; R: 16, Lap: 75). Logistic regression analysis was employed to identify risk factors for POPF.

Results: POPF occurred in 20 of 131 cases (grade B: 19, C: 1, 15.3%). The TP group exhibited the lowest POPF rate (TP vs FM vs S: 5.6% vs 27.3% vs 14.3%). Multivariate analysis identified pancreatic thickness ≥12 mm as an independent risk factor. For thickness <12 mm, no significant differences in POPF rates were observed (TP vs FM vs S: 0% vs 25.0% vs 5.6%). However, for thickness ≥12 mm, the TP group had a significantly lower POPF rate compared with the S group (TP vs FM vs S: 7.7% vs 28.6% vs 47.4%).

Conclusion: The TP method is superior to stapler closure in preventing POPF, especially in cases with pancreatic thickness of ≥12 mm.

经胰腺褥式缝合与聚乙二醇酸片在胰腺残端缝合中的应用对预防机器人胰腺远端切除术术后胰瘘的影响
目的:微创远端胰腺切除术(DP)中的胰腺残端缝合因其简便性通常使用订书机,但术后胰瘘(POPF)仍是最常见的并发症。我们开发了一种新型残端缝合技术,在机器人胰腺切除术中使用带聚乙二醇片的经胰腺褥式缝合(TP 法)。本研究旨在评估 TP 方法的有效性:本研究纳入了 2011 年 2 月至 2024 年 7 月间实施的 145 例纯微创腹腔镜手术:34 例机器人腹腔镜手术(R)和 97 例腹腔镜手术(Lap)。根据残端闭合方法对 3 组手术结果进行了比较:18例采用TP方法(TP组;R:18例),22例采用鱼嘴方式手缝闭合(FM组;Lap:22例),91例采用加强型订书机(S组;R:16例,Lap:75例)。采用逻辑回归分析确定 POPF 的风险因素:131例中有20例发生了POPF(B级:19例,C级:1例,15.3%)。TP组的POPF发生率最低(TP vs FM vs S:5.6% vs 27.3% vs 14.3%)。多变量分析发现,胰腺厚度≥12 毫米是一个独立的风险因素。对于厚度 结论:TP 法在预防 POPF 方面优于订书机闭合法,尤其是在胰腺厚度≥12 毫米的病例中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques is a primary source for peer-reviewed, original articles on the newest techniques and applications in operative laparoscopy and endoscopy. Its Editorial Board includes many of the surgeons who pioneered the use of these revolutionary techniques. The journal provides complete, timely, accurate, practical coverage of laparoscopic and endoscopic techniques and procedures; current clinical and basic science research; preoperative and postoperative patient management; complications in laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery; and new developments in instrumentation and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信