Diego Foschi, Giuliano Sarro, Micaela Serbelloni, Andrea Rizzi, Antonio Chiappa
{"title":"Type 2 diabetes mellitus remission following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and hindgut-based procedure: a retrospective multicenter study.","authors":"Diego Foschi, Giuliano Sarro, Micaela Serbelloni, Andrea Rizzi, Antonio Chiappa","doi":"10.1007/s13304-024-02035-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is considered the standard bariatric surgery due to its excellent outcomes. However, in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), SG alone carries a high risk of metabolic failure. To achieve better metabolic results, SG can be combined with either foregut- or hindgut-based procedures, although a direct comparison between these approaches is lacking. In this retrospective study, we compared the bariatric and metabolic effects of SG (n = 20 patients) with SG associated with duodenal diversion and ileal interposition (SG-DD-II) (n = 20), SG associated with duodenal-ileal anastomosis (SADI-S) (n = 20), and SG associated with single gastro-ileal anastomosis (SASI-S) (n = 20). Patient data, including anthropometric measurements and T2DM characteristics, were extracted from our database. The evaluation criteria included weight loss (% excess weight loss), fasting glycemia (FGL), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) percentage, and T2DM remission rates. Our statistical analysis (p < 0.05) revealed that shortly after surgery, all procedures demonstrated acceptable outcomes in terms of weight loss and T2DM remission. However, after 3 and 5 years post-surgery, the T2DM relapse rate was significantly higher following SG alone compared to hindgut-based operations. In patients with obesity and T2DM, we recommend combining SG with a hindgut-based procedure to reduce the long-term relapse rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-02035-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is considered the standard bariatric surgery due to its excellent outcomes. However, in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), SG alone carries a high risk of metabolic failure. To achieve better metabolic results, SG can be combined with either foregut- or hindgut-based procedures, although a direct comparison between these approaches is lacking. In this retrospective study, we compared the bariatric and metabolic effects of SG (n = 20 patients) with SG associated with duodenal diversion and ileal interposition (SG-DD-II) (n = 20), SG associated with duodenal-ileal anastomosis (SADI-S) (n = 20), and SG associated with single gastro-ileal anastomosis (SASI-S) (n = 20). Patient data, including anthropometric measurements and T2DM characteristics, were extracted from our database. The evaluation criteria included weight loss (% excess weight loss), fasting glycemia (FGL), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) percentage, and T2DM remission rates. Our statistical analysis (p < 0.05) revealed that shortly after surgery, all procedures demonstrated acceptable outcomes in terms of weight loss and T2DM remission. However, after 3 and 5 years post-surgery, the T2DM relapse rate was significantly higher following SG alone compared to hindgut-based operations. In patients with obesity and T2DM, we recommend combining SG with a hindgut-based procedure to reduce the long-term relapse rate.
期刊介绍:
Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future.
Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts.
Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.