Analgesic efficacy of sacral neuromodulation for chronic pelvic cancer pain.

IF 1.3 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-02 DOI:10.4103/sja.sja_307_24
Khaled M Fares, Sahar A B Mohamed, Diab F Hetta, Moaaz Mohamed Tohamy, Nourhan A Elgalaly, Nayira M Elhusseini, Fatma Adel El Sherif
{"title":"Analgesic efficacy of sacral neuromodulation for chronic pelvic cancer pain.","authors":"Khaled M Fares, Sahar A B Mohamed, Diab F Hetta, Moaaz Mohamed Tohamy, Nourhan A Elgalaly, Nayira M Elhusseini, Fatma Adel El Sherif","doi":"10.4103/sja.sja_307_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neuromodulation has provided promising results in chronic pain management. Sacral neurostimulation (SNS) is a neuromodulatory technique, where the sacral nerve roots are electrically stimulated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the efficacy of the trial phase to control severe cancer pain in pelvic organs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Pilot study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Chronic pelvic cancer pain patients were managed with morphine ≥ 60 mg daily, duloxetine 30 mg, and celecoxib 200 mg twice daily. Twenty-two adults were divided randomly into two equal groups: the SNS group (N = 11), received a sacral neurostimulator device and opioid analgesics, and the opioid group (N = 11), received increased opioid analgesics to control pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Visual analog scale scores were decreased in the SNS group at 24 h, 4 days, 1, and 2 weeks in SNS compared to the opioid group, medians (IQR) [4 (3-5) vs 6 (5-7), 3 (3-4) vs 5 (5-6), 3 (3-4) vs 5 (5-6), and 3 (3-3) vs 5 (4-6) <i>P</i> < 0.001], daily morphine consumption was reduced in the SNS group compared to the opioid group, median (IQR) [90 (60-90) mg vs 120 (120-150) mg, <i>P</i> < 0.001] and [30 (30-60) mg vs 150 (120-180) mg] during the first and second weeks. The SNS group had a better life quality compared to the opioid group after 2 weeks, median (IQR) was (123 (122.5-124) vs 117 (117-118.5) <i>P</i> < 0.001), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SNS trial device showed effectiveness in managing severe chronic pelvic cancer pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":21533,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"18 4","pages":"534-539"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587952/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_307_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neuromodulation has provided promising results in chronic pain management. Sacral neurostimulation (SNS) is a neuromodulatory technique, where the sacral nerve roots are electrically stimulated.

Objective: Evaluate the efficacy of the trial phase to control severe cancer pain in pelvic organs.

Design: Pilot study.

Methods: Chronic pelvic cancer pain patients were managed with morphine ≥ 60 mg daily, duloxetine 30 mg, and celecoxib 200 mg twice daily. Twenty-two adults were divided randomly into two equal groups: the SNS group (N = 11), received a sacral neurostimulator device and opioid analgesics, and the opioid group (N = 11), received increased opioid analgesics to control pain.

Results: Visual analog scale scores were decreased in the SNS group at 24 h, 4 days, 1, and 2 weeks in SNS compared to the opioid group, medians (IQR) [4 (3-5) vs 6 (5-7), 3 (3-4) vs 5 (5-6), 3 (3-4) vs 5 (5-6), and 3 (3-3) vs 5 (4-6) P < 0.001], daily morphine consumption was reduced in the SNS group compared to the opioid group, median (IQR) [90 (60-90) mg vs 120 (120-150) mg, P < 0.001] and [30 (30-60) mg vs 150 (120-180) mg] during the first and second weeks. The SNS group had a better life quality compared to the opioid group after 2 weeks, median (IQR) was (123 (122.5-124) vs 117 (117-118.5) P < 0.001), respectively.

Conclusion: The SNS trial device showed effectiveness in managing severe chronic pelvic cancer pain.

骶神经调控对慢性盆腔癌疼痛的镇痛效果。
背景:神经调控在慢性疼痛治疗方面取得了可喜的成果。骶神经刺激(SNS)是一种神经调节技术,通过电刺激骶神经根:评估试验阶段控制盆腔器官严重癌痛的疗效:试验研究:慢性盆腔癌痛患者每天使用吗啡≥60毫克、度洛西汀30毫克和塞来昔布200毫克,每天两次。22名成人被随机分为两个相同的组别:SNS组(N=11)接受骶神经刺激器装置和阿片类镇痛药,阿片组(N=11)接受更多阿片类镇痛药来控制疼痛:与阿片类药物组相比,骶神经刺激器组在24 h、4天、1周和2周的视觉模拟量表评分均有所下降,中位数(IQR)[4 (3-5) vs 6 (5-7)、3 (3-4) vs 5 (5-6)、3 (3-4) vs 5 (5-6)、3 (3-3) vs 5 (4-6) P < 0.001],与阿片类药物组相比,SNS 组在第一周和第二周的每日吗啡消耗量减少,中位数(IQR)[90 (60-90) mg vs 120 (120-150) mg,P < 0.001]和[30 (30-60) mg vs 150 (120-180) mg]。两周后,SNS组的生活质量优于阿片组,中位数(IQR)分别为(123 (122.5-124) vs 117 (117-118.5) P < 0.001):SNS试验设备在治疗严重的慢性盆腔癌疼痛方面效果显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
141
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信