Success rate and outcome of labor epidural among variable levels of residents and practicing anesthesiologists in an academic medical center in Saudi Arabia.

IF 1.3 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-02 DOI:10.4103/sja.sja_302_24
Sara H Farsi
{"title":"Success rate and outcome of labor epidural among variable levels of residents and practicing anesthesiologists in an academic medical center in Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Sara H Farsi","doi":"10.4103/sja.sja_302_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>This study aimed to highlight differences in success rates and patient outcomes during epidural insertion among anesthesia staff, junior trainees, and staff anesthesiologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included all women who received a labor epidural between January 1, 2020 and April 30, 2022. The cases were divided into three groups: junior residents, senior residents, and staff anesthesiologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 822 cases included in analysis, 92, 240, and 490 catheters were placed by junior residents, senior residents, and staff anesthesiologists, respectively. Although the success rate among junior residents (90.7%) was lower than those of senior residents (97%) and staff anesthesiologists (95.1%), the difference was not significant (<i>P</i> = 0.067). The mean procedural time in minutes was significantly longer in the junior resident's group (18.1 min) compared to the senior residents (14.18 min) and staff anesthesiologists (14.87 min) (<i>P</i> < 0.001). A significant difference was observed in the number of needle pricks and catheter insertion attempts when comparing the junior residents, senior residents, and staff anesthesiologists' groups (<i>P</i> < 0.001). In the logistic regression analysis, procedural time remained the only predictor of epidural success.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With the success rate above 90%, junior anesthesia trainees require more time and attempts to insert labor epidurals. It is essential that training programs provide opportunities for anesthesia trainees to become proficient in their epidural insertion techniques prior to clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":21533,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"18 4","pages":"516-520"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587971/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_302_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: This study aimed to highlight differences in success rates and patient outcomes during epidural insertion among anesthesia staff, junior trainees, and staff anesthesiologists.

Methods: We included all women who received a labor epidural between January 1, 2020 and April 30, 2022. The cases were divided into three groups: junior residents, senior residents, and staff anesthesiologists.

Results: Among 822 cases included in analysis, 92, 240, and 490 catheters were placed by junior residents, senior residents, and staff anesthesiologists, respectively. Although the success rate among junior residents (90.7%) was lower than those of senior residents (97%) and staff anesthesiologists (95.1%), the difference was not significant (P = 0.067). The mean procedural time in minutes was significantly longer in the junior resident's group (18.1 min) compared to the senior residents (14.18 min) and staff anesthesiologists (14.87 min) (P < 0.001). A significant difference was observed in the number of needle pricks and catheter insertion attempts when comparing the junior residents, senior residents, and staff anesthesiologists' groups (P < 0.001). In the logistic regression analysis, procedural time remained the only predictor of epidural success.

Conclusions: With the success rate above 90%, junior anesthesia trainees require more time and attempts to insert labor epidurals. It is essential that training programs provide opportunities for anesthesia trainees to become proficient in their epidural insertion techniques prior to clinical practice.

沙特阿拉伯一家学术医疗中心不同级别住院医师和执业麻醉师的分娩硬膜外麻醉成功率和结果。
背景和目的:本研究旨在强调麻醉科工作人员、初级实习生和麻醉科工作人员在硬膜外插入过程中的成功率和患者预后方面的差异:我们纳入了 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 4 月 30 日期间接受硬膜外麻醉的所有产妇。方法:我们纳入了 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 4 月 30 日期间接受过硬膜外麻醉的所有产妇,并将病例分为三组:初级住院医师、高级住院医师和麻醉师:在纳入分析的 822 个病例中,分别有 92、240 和 490 个导管是由低年资住院医师、高年资住院医师和员工麻醉师置入的。虽然初级住院医师的成功率(90.7%)低于高级住院医师(97%)和麻醉科医生(95.1%),但差异并不显著(P = 0.067)。与资深住院医师(14.18 分钟)和麻醉师(14.87 分钟)相比,初级住院医师组的平均手术时间(18.1 分钟)明显更长(P < 0.001)。与低年资住院医师组、高年资住院医师组和员工麻醉师组相比,针刺次数和导管插入尝试次数存在明显差异(P < 0.001)。在逻辑回归分析中,手术时间仍然是硬膜外麻醉成功率的唯一预测因素:结论:在成功率超过 90% 的情况下,初级麻醉学员需要更多的时间和尝试来插入分娩硬膜外麻醉。培训计划必须为麻醉学员提供机会,使其在临床实践前熟练掌握硬膜外插入技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
141
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信