Science or Spectacle? A Critical Evaluation of the decade of Aesthetic Medicine Conferences using Punctuated Equilibrium Framework.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Eqram Rahman, Karim Sayed, Parinitha Rao, Nanze Yu, Keming Wang, Patricia E Garcia, Sotirios Ioannidis, Wolfgang G Philipp-Dormston, Jean D A Carruthers, William Richard Webb
{"title":"Science or Spectacle? A Critical Evaluation of the decade of Aesthetic Medicine Conferences using Punctuated Equilibrium Framework.","authors":"Eqram Rahman, Karim Sayed, Parinitha Rao, Nanze Yu, Keming Wang, Patricia E Garcia, Sotirios Ioannidis, Wolfgang G Philipp-Dormston, Jean D A Carruthers, William Richard Webb","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000011899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The global aesthetic medicine industry is rapidly expanding, with conferences serving as crucial platforms for knowledge exchange and collaboration. However, concerns have emerged about the increasing prioritisation of commercial content over scientifically rigorous presentations. This study critically evaluates the balance between commercial and scientific content at aesthetic medicine conferences, utilising artificial intelligence (AI) tools to analyse the impact of industry sponsorship and live procedural demonstrations on educational value.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using the Punctuated Equilibrium Framework (PEF), AI-driven content analysis, social network analysis (SNA), and sentiment analysis were applied to evaluate conference data, including programs, sponsorship details, speaker affiliations, and attendee engagement metrics. The study analysed global and regional aesthetic medicine conferences from 2014 to 2024, identifying patterns and punctuated shifts in the balance between scientific and commercially driven content.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AI-based analysis of 487 conferences, comprising over 28,000 sessions and 2 million social media posts, revealed an increasing trend towards commercially focused content, particularly in industry-sponsored events. Approximately 44% of sessions were commercially oriented, with significant spikes during product launches. Academic and clinical speakers were more prevalent in scientific conferences, while industry-affiliated speakers dominated commercial sessions. Social media sentiment, analysed using AI tools, reflected high engagement with procedural demonstrations but also highlighted concerns about educational quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While industry-driven sessions garnered higher immediate engagement, they reduced long-term cognitive retention and compromised the educational integrity of conferences. The use of AI in this study enabled a deeper understanding of content trends and their effects. Aesthetic medicine conferences must recalibrate the balance between commercial interests and scientific rigour to ensure sustainable professional development and patient safety.</p><p><strong>Evidence level: </strong>IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011899","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The global aesthetic medicine industry is rapidly expanding, with conferences serving as crucial platforms for knowledge exchange and collaboration. However, concerns have emerged about the increasing prioritisation of commercial content over scientifically rigorous presentations. This study critically evaluates the balance between commercial and scientific content at aesthetic medicine conferences, utilising artificial intelligence (AI) tools to analyse the impact of industry sponsorship and live procedural demonstrations on educational value.

Method: Using the Punctuated Equilibrium Framework (PEF), AI-driven content analysis, social network analysis (SNA), and sentiment analysis were applied to evaluate conference data, including programs, sponsorship details, speaker affiliations, and attendee engagement metrics. The study analysed global and regional aesthetic medicine conferences from 2014 to 2024, identifying patterns and punctuated shifts in the balance between scientific and commercially driven content.

Results: AI-based analysis of 487 conferences, comprising over 28,000 sessions and 2 million social media posts, revealed an increasing trend towards commercially focused content, particularly in industry-sponsored events. Approximately 44% of sessions were commercially oriented, with significant spikes during product launches. Academic and clinical speakers were more prevalent in scientific conferences, while industry-affiliated speakers dominated commercial sessions. Social media sentiment, analysed using AI tools, reflected high engagement with procedural demonstrations but also highlighted concerns about educational quality.

Conclusion: While industry-driven sessions garnered higher immediate engagement, they reduced long-term cognitive retention and compromised the educational integrity of conferences. The use of AI in this study enabled a deeper understanding of content trends and their effects. Aesthetic medicine conferences must recalibrate the balance between commercial interests and scientific rigour to ensure sustainable professional development and patient safety.

Evidence level: IV.

科学还是奇观?使用 "功能平衡 "框架对美容医学会议十年进行批判性评估。
介绍:全球美容医学行业正在迅速发展,各种会议成为知识交流与合作的重要平台。然而,越来越多的会议将商业内容置于严谨的科学演讲之上,这引起了人们的关注。本研究利用人工智能(AI)工具分析了行业赞助和现场程序演示对教育价值的影响,对美容医学会议中商业和科学内容之间的平衡进行了批判性评估:方法:利用标点平衡框架(Punctuated Equilibrium Framework,PEF)、人工智能驱动的内容分析、社交网络分析(Social Network Analysis,SNA)和情感分析来评估会议数据,包括会议日程、赞助详情、演讲者关系和参会者参与度指标。研究分析了2014年至2024年的全球和地区美容医学会议,确定了科学和商业驱动内容之间平衡的模式和点状变化:基于人工智能对487场会议(包括28,000多场会议和200万条社交媒体帖子)进行的分析表明,以商业为重点的内容呈上升趋势,尤其是在行业赞助的活动中。约 44% 的会议以商业为导向,在产品发布期间出现明显高峰。学术和临床发言人在科学会议中更为普遍,而行业附属发言人则主导了商业会议。使用人工智能工具分析的社交媒体情感反映了人们对程序演示的高度参与,但也凸显了对教育质量的担忧:结论:虽然行业驱动的会议获得了更高的即时参与度,但却降低了长期认知保持率,损害了会议的教育完整性。在本研究中使用人工智能可以更深入地了解内容趋势及其影响。美容医学会议必须重新调整商业利益与科学严谨性之间的平衡,以确保可持续的专业发展和患者安全:证据等级:IV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1436
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信