Nathan R King, Alison M Zeccola, Li Wang, John A Harris, Christine E Foley
{"title":"Effect of Patient Age on Decisional Regret After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.","authors":"Nathan R King, Alison M Zeccola, Li Wang, John A Harris, Christine E Foley","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare long-term decision regret between younger (30 years or younger) and older (31-49 years) patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a matched retrospective cohort study to analyze patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign indications from 2009 to 2016. Respondents completed surveys including two validated decision regret scales: one measuring surgical decision regret and the other measuring loss-of-fertility regret. Participant aged was dichotomized as 30 years or younger and 31-49 years. Chi square, Fisher exact, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests and logistic regression were used to compare groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred eighty-seven participants were successfully contacted, and 241 completed the survey (84.0%). Seventy-seven respondents (32.0%) were aged 30 years or younger, and 164 (68.0%) were aged 31-49 years. The average time since surgery was 7.2 years (±2.2 years; range 3.7-12.1 years). Participants aged 30 years or younger regretted both undergoing surgery (32.5% vs 9.1%, P<.001; OR 4.8, 95% CI, 2.3-9.8) and loss of fertility (39.0% vs 13.4%, P<.001, OR 4.1, 95% CI, 2.2-7.8) at significantly higher rates than participants aged 31-49 years. Overall, 83.1% of younger participants agreed that hysterectomy was the right choice compared with 97% of older participants (P<.001). Higher rates of surgical and loss-of-fertility regret were seen in participants with self-reported pelvic pain (P=.003, P=.011), preoperative diagnosis of endometriosis (P=.037, P=.046), and postoperative complications (P=.043, P<.001). Although time since hysterectomy did not affect rate of surgical regret (P=.138), participants further from their hysterectomies had lower rates of loss-of-fertility regret (P=.003). Patient age remained significantly associated with both surgical regret (adjusted OR 2.9 (95% CI, 1.3-6.5) and loss-of-fertility regret (adjusted OR 2.8 (95% CI, 1.3-6.0) on multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants aged 30 years or younger were more likely to regret their decision to undergo hysterectomy than participants aged 31-49 years, regardless of parity, prior sterilization, or previous treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"144 6","pages":"757-764"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005730","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To compare long-term decision regret between younger (30 years or younger) and older (31-49 years) patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease.
Methods: We conducted a matched retrospective cohort study to analyze patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign indications from 2009 to 2016. Respondents completed surveys including two validated decision regret scales: one measuring surgical decision regret and the other measuring loss-of-fertility regret. Participant aged was dichotomized as 30 years or younger and 31-49 years. Chi square, Fisher exact, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests and logistic regression were used to compare groups.
Results: Two hundred eighty-seven participants were successfully contacted, and 241 completed the survey (84.0%). Seventy-seven respondents (32.0%) were aged 30 years or younger, and 164 (68.0%) were aged 31-49 years. The average time since surgery was 7.2 years (±2.2 years; range 3.7-12.1 years). Participants aged 30 years or younger regretted both undergoing surgery (32.5% vs 9.1%, P<.001; OR 4.8, 95% CI, 2.3-9.8) and loss of fertility (39.0% vs 13.4%, P<.001, OR 4.1, 95% CI, 2.2-7.8) at significantly higher rates than participants aged 31-49 years. Overall, 83.1% of younger participants agreed that hysterectomy was the right choice compared with 97% of older participants (P<.001). Higher rates of surgical and loss-of-fertility regret were seen in participants with self-reported pelvic pain (P=.003, P=.011), preoperative diagnosis of endometriosis (P=.037, P=.046), and postoperative complications (P=.043, P<.001). Although time since hysterectomy did not affect rate of surgical regret (P=.138), participants further from their hysterectomies had lower rates of loss-of-fertility regret (P=.003). Patient age remained significantly associated with both surgical regret (adjusted OR 2.9 (95% CI, 1.3-6.5) and loss-of-fertility regret (adjusted OR 2.8 (95% CI, 1.3-6.0) on multivariable logistic regression.
Conclusion: Participants aged 30 years or younger were more likely to regret their decision to undergo hysterectomy than participants aged 31-49 years, regardless of parity, prior sterilization, or previous treatment.
期刊介绍:
"Obstetrics & Gynecology," affectionately known as "The Green Journal," is the official publication of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Since its inception in 1953, the journal has been dedicated to advancing the clinical practice of obstetrics and gynecology, as well as related fields. The journal's mission is to promote excellence in these areas by publishing a diverse range of articles that cover translational and clinical topics.
"Obstetrics & Gynecology" provides a platform for the dissemination of evidence-based research, clinical guidelines, and expert opinions that are essential for the continuous improvement of women's health care. The journal's content is designed to inform and educate obstetricians, gynecologists, and other healthcare professionals, ensuring that they stay abreast of the latest developments and best practices in their field.