Predicting Syndromic Status Based on Longitudinal Data from Parental Reports of the Presence of Additional Structural and Functional Anomalies in Children Born with an Orofacial Cleft.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Amy J V Davies, Yvonne E Wren, Mark Hamilton, Jonathan R Sandy, Evangelia Stergiakouli, Sarah J Lewis
{"title":"Predicting Syndromic Status Based on Longitudinal Data from Parental Reports of the Presence of Additional Structural and Functional Anomalies in Children Born with an Orofacial Cleft.","authors":"Amy J V Davies, Yvonne E Wren, Mark Hamilton, Jonathan R Sandy, Evangelia Stergiakouli, Sarah J Lewis","doi":"10.3390/jcm13226924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Orofacial clefts are the most common craniofacial congenital malformation in humans. Approximately 30% of clefts arise as part of a syndrome or sequence, characterised by co-existing structural and functional anomalies. Many syndromes are thought to be undiagnosed, although the presence of multiple anomalies may indicate the presence of a syndrome or sequence. <b>Aim:</b> To determine the extent to which the presence of additional structural and functional anomalies can help to identify those children with an undiagnosed syndrome. <b>Methods:</b> Secondary data analysis was performed using data from 1701 children born with an orofacial cleft, collected as part of a longitudinal cohort study, the Cleft Collective. Data were collected between 2013 and 2023 across the United Kingdom. The prevalence of structural and functional anomalies and syndromes were explored using descriptive statistics. Logistic regression was used to determine the extent to which anomalies can predict syndromic status. <b>Results:</b> A syndrome and/or sequence was reported in 20.5% children. Among children who reported five or more anomalies, the prevalence of a diagnosed syndrome was 81.5%. When adjusting for cleft subtype and sex, in 27 out of 32 anomalies tested, strong evidence was found to suggest increased odds of having a syndrome if the specific anomaly was present compared to if the anomaly was absent (<i>p</i>-values ranged between 1.4 × 10<sup>-30</sup> and 0.002). <b>Conclusions:</b> Children born with a cleft who present with two or more anomalies are much more likely to have a syndrome than those with fewer anomalies and should be prioritised for genetic screening and counselling.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"13 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226924","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Orofacial clefts are the most common craniofacial congenital malformation in humans. Approximately 30% of clefts arise as part of a syndrome or sequence, characterised by co-existing structural and functional anomalies. Many syndromes are thought to be undiagnosed, although the presence of multiple anomalies may indicate the presence of a syndrome or sequence. Aim: To determine the extent to which the presence of additional structural and functional anomalies can help to identify those children with an undiagnosed syndrome. Methods: Secondary data analysis was performed using data from 1701 children born with an orofacial cleft, collected as part of a longitudinal cohort study, the Cleft Collective. Data were collected between 2013 and 2023 across the United Kingdom. The prevalence of structural and functional anomalies and syndromes were explored using descriptive statistics. Logistic regression was used to determine the extent to which anomalies can predict syndromic status. Results: A syndrome and/or sequence was reported in 20.5% children. Among children who reported five or more anomalies, the prevalence of a diagnosed syndrome was 81.5%. When adjusting for cleft subtype and sex, in 27 out of 32 anomalies tested, strong evidence was found to suggest increased odds of having a syndrome if the specific anomaly was present compared to if the anomaly was absent (p-values ranged between 1.4 × 10-30 and 0.002). Conclusions: Children born with a cleft who present with two or more anomalies are much more likely to have a syndrome than those with fewer anomalies and should be prioritised for genetic screening and counselling.

根据父母对出生时患有口面裂的儿童是否存在其他结构和功能异常的报告所提供的纵向数据,预测综合症状态。
背景:颅面裂是人类最常见的颅面先天畸形。约 30% 的颅裂是综合征或序列的一部分,其特征是同时存在结构和功能异常。尽管存在多种异常可能表明存在综合征或序列,但许多综合征被认为是未诊断的。目的:确定存在额外的结构和功能异常在多大程度上有助于识别那些患有未诊断综合征的儿童。方法:利用来自儿童医院的数据进行二次数据分析:利用纵向队列研究 "裂隙集体"(Cleft Collective)中收集的1701名先天性口面裂患儿的数据进行二次数据分析。数据收集时间为 2013 年至 2023 年,地点在英国各地。研究采用描述性统计方法探讨了结构和功能异常及综合征的患病率。逻辑回归用于确定异常在多大程度上可以预测综合征状态。结果:20.5%的儿童报告了综合征和/或序列。在报告了五项或五项以上异常的儿童中,诊断出综合征的比例为 81.5%。在对裂隙亚型和性别进行调整后,在检测的 32 种异常中的 27 种异常中,有确凿证据表明,如果存在特定异常,则患综合征的几率会比不存在异常时高(P 值介于 1.4 × 10-30 和 0.002 之间)。结论出现两种或两种以上异常的先天性唇裂患儿比出现较少异常的患儿更有可能患有综合征,因此应优先进行遗传筛查和咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信