Impact of Duodenal Papilla Morphology on the Success of Transpancreatic Precut Sphincterotomy.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yi-Peng Chen, Yi-Jun Liao, Yen-Chun Peng, Chun-Fang Tung, Hsin-Ju Tsai, Sheng-Shun Yang, Chia-Chang Chen
{"title":"Impact of Duodenal Papilla Morphology on the Success of Transpancreatic Precut Sphincterotomy.","authors":"Yi-Peng Chen, Yi-Jun Liao, Yen-Chun Peng, Chun-Fang Tung, Hsin-Ju Tsai, Sheng-Shun Yang, Chia-Chang Chen","doi":"10.3390/jcm13226940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: This study aimed to evaluate whether the morphology of the duodenal major papilla is linked to transpancreatic precut sphincterotomy (TPS) failure. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) at our institution. The inclusion criteria involved patients with a naïve major duodenal papilla who required TPS due to difficult biliary cannulation. Papilla morphology was classified using Haraldsson's system, as follows: regular (Type 1), small (Type 2), protruding or pendulous (Type 3), and creased or ridged (Type 4). The analysis focused on identifying risk factors for TPS failure and related complications. <b>Results</b>: A total of 103 cases were analyzed, with an overall TPS success rate of 85.44%. There were no significant differences in age, gender, ERCP indications, or the prevalence of juxtapupillary diverticula across the four papilla types. The TPS failure rates by papilla type were Type 1 (10.53%), Type 2 (0%), Type 3 (16.67%), and Type 4 (28%). Type 4 papilla had a significantly higher failure rate compared to Type 1 and Type 2 in the univariate analysis (<i>p</i> = 0.028), but this was not statistically significant in the multivariate analysis (<i>p</i> = 0.052). Age emerged as an independent risk factor for TPS failure. <b>Conclusions</b>: Duodenal papilla morphology may influence the success rate of TPS, with advanced age being a key risk factor for failure. Identifying high-risk factors such as Type 4 papilla and older age can help endoscopists adjust their techniques early, potentially improving outcomes and minimizing complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"13 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226940","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate whether the morphology of the duodenal major papilla is linked to transpancreatic precut sphincterotomy (TPS) failure. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) at our institution. The inclusion criteria involved patients with a naïve major duodenal papilla who required TPS due to difficult biliary cannulation. Papilla morphology was classified using Haraldsson's system, as follows: regular (Type 1), small (Type 2), protruding or pendulous (Type 3), and creased or ridged (Type 4). The analysis focused on identifying risk factors for TPS failure and related complications. Results: A total of 103 cases were analyzed, with an overall TPS success rate of 85.44%. There were no significant differences in age, gender, ERCP indications, or the prevalence of juxtapupillary diverticula across the four papilla types. The TPS failure rates by papilla type were Type 1 (10.53%), Type 2 (0%), Type 3 (16.67%), and Type 4 (28%). Type 4 papilla had a significantly higher failure rate compared to Type 1 and Type 2 in the univariate analysis (p = 0.028), but this was not statistically significant in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.052). Age emerged as an independent risk factor for TPS failure. Conclusions: Duodenal papilla morphology may influence the success rate of TPS, with advanced age being a key risk factor for failure. Identifying high-risk factors such as Type 4 papilla and older age can help endoscopists adjust their techniques early, potentially improving outcomes and minimizing complications.

十二指肠乳头形态对经胰腺预切括约肌切开术成功率的影响
背景:本研究旨在评估十二指肠大乳头的形态是否与转胰管前括约肌切开术(TPS)失败有关。研究方法我们对在本院接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)的患者进行了回顾性研究。纳入标准包括因胆道插管困难而需要 TPS 的十二指肠大乳头幼稚患者。乳头形态采用 Haraldsson 系统进行分类:规则(1 型)、小(2 型)、突出或下垂(3 型)、皱褶或脊状(4 型)。分析的重点是确定 TPS 故障和相关并发症的风险因素。结果:共分析了 103 个病例,总体 TPS 成功率为 85.44%。四种乳头类型在年龄、性别、ERCP适应症或并瞳孔憩室发生率方面没有明显差异。按乳头类型划分,TPS失败率分别为1型(10.53%)、2型(0%)、3型(16.67%)和4型(28%)。在单变量分析中,4 型乳头的失败率明显高于 1 型和 2 型乳头(p = 0.028),但在多变量分析中,这一结果没有统计学意义(p = 0.052)。年龄是导致 TPS 失败的一个独立风险因素。结论十二指肠乳头形态可能会影响 TPS 的成功率,高龄是失败的关键风险因素。识别 4 型乳头和高龄等高风险因素有助于内镜医师及早调整技术,从而改善治疗效果并减少并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信