Comparative Analysis of Medical Interventions to Alleviate Endometriosis-Related Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ádám Csirzó, Dénes Péter Kovács, Anett Szabó, Bence Szabó, Árpád Jankó, Péter Hegyi, Péter Nyirády, Nándor Ács, Sándor Valent
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Medical Interventions to Alleviate Endometriosis-Related Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Ádám Csirzó, Dénes Péter Kovács, Anett Szabó, Bence Szabó, Árpád Jankó, Péter Hegyi, Péter Nyirády, Nándor Ács, Sándor Valent","doi":"10.3390/jcm13226932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Endometriosis is a chronic condition that affects 6-10% of women of reproductive age, with pain and infertility being its primary symptoms. The most common aspects of pain are overall pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and dyspareunia. Our aim was to compare the available medical treatments for endometriosis-related pain. <b>Methods</b>: A systematic search was conducted in three medical databases to assess available drug options for pain management. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating various medical treatments for endometriosis-related pain on different pain scales were included. Results were presented as p-scores and, in cases of placebo controls, as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). From the available data, a network meta-analysis was carried out. <b>Results</b>: The search yielded 1314 records, of which 45 were eligible for data extraction. Eight networks were created, and a total of 16 treatments were analyzed. The highest p-score, meaning greatest pain relief (p-score: 0.618), for the treatment of dysmenorrhea was achieved using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists for 3 months on a scale of 0-100. Additionally, a p-score of 0.649 was attained following a 6-month treatment with GnRH agonists combined with hormonal contraceptives (CHCs). In the case of dyspareunia on a scale of 0-100 following 3 months of treatment, CHCs (p-score: 0.805) were the most effective, and CHCs combined with aromatase inhibitors (p-score: 0.677) were the best treatment option following 6 months of treatment. In the case of overall pelvic pain, CHCs (p-score: 0.751) yielded the highest p-score on a scale of 0-100 following 3 months of treatment, and progestins combined with aromatase inhibitors (p-score: 0.873) following 6 months of treatment. Progestins (p-score: 0.901) were most effective in cases of overall pelvic pain on a scale of 0-3 following 3 months of treatment. <b>Conclusions</b>: Our network meta-analysis showed that in cases of dysmenorrhea, GnRH agonists supplemented with CHCs reduced pain the most following 3 months of treatment. Regarding dyspareunia CHCs were most effective, and in the case of overall pelvic pain, CHCs or progestins combined with aromatase inhibitors yielded the most desirable results.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"13 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226932","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Endometriosis is a chronic condition that affects 6-10% of women of reproductive age, with pain and infertility being its primary symptoms. The most common aspects of pain are overall pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and dyspareunia. Our aim was to compare the available medical treatments for endometriosis-related pain. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in three medical databases to assess available drug options for pain management. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating various medical treatments for endometriosis-related pain on different pain scales were included. Results were presented as p-scores and, in cases of placebo controls, as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). From the available data, a network meta-analysis was carried out. Results: The search yielded 1314 records, of which 45 were eligible for data extraction. Eight networks were created, and a total of 16 treatments were analyzed. The highest p-score, meaning greatest pain relief (p-score: 0.618), for the treatment of dysmenorrhea was achieved using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists for 3 months on a scale of 0-100. Additionally, a p-score of 0.649 was attained following a 6-month treatment with GnRH agonists combined with hormonal contraceptives (CHCs). In the case of dyspareunia on a scale of 0-100 following 3 months of treatment, CHCs (p-score: 0.805) were the most effective, and CHCs combined with aromatase inhibitors (p-score: 0.677) were the best treatment option following 6 months of treatment. In the case of overall pelvic pain, CHCs (p-score: 0.751) yielded the highest p-score on a scale of 0-100 following 3 months of treatment, and progestins combined with aromatase inhibitors (p-score: 0.873) following 6 months of treatment. Progestins (p-score: 0.901) were most effective in cases of overall pelvic pain on a scale of 0-3 following 3 months of treatment. Conclusions: Our network meta-analysis showed that in cases of dysmenorrhea, GnRH agonists supplemented with CHCs reduced pain the most following 3 months of treatment. Regarding dyspareunia CHCs were most effective, and in the case of overall pelvic pain, CHCs or progestins combined with aromatase inhibitors yielded the most desirable results.

缓解子宫内膜异位症相关疼痛的医疗干预对比分析:系统性回顾和网络元分析。
背景/目的:子宫内膜异位症是一种慢性疾病,影响着 6-10% 的育龄妇女,疼痛和不孕是其主要症状。最常见的疼痛是整体盆腔疼痛、痛经和排便困难。我们的目的是比较现有的治疗子宫内膜异位症相关疼痛的方法。方法:我们在三个医学数据库中进行了系统检索,以评估现有的疼痛治疗药物选择。纳入的随机对照试验(RCT)根据不同的疼痛量表调查了治疗子宫内膜异位症相关疼痛的各种药物疗法。试验结果以 p 值表示,如果是安慰剂对照组,则以平均差 (MD) 和 95% 置信区间 (CI) 表示。根据现有数据进行了网络荟萃分析。分析结果共搜索到 1314 条记录,其中 45 条符合数据提取条件。建立了 8 个网络,共分析了 16 种治疗方法。在治疗痛经的过程中,使用促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)激动剂治疗 3 个月的 p 评分最高(p-score: 0.618),疼痛缓解程度最大(p-score: 0.618),评分范围为 0-100 分。此外,在使用促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)激动剂联合激素避孕药(CHC)治疗 6 个月后,P 评分达到 0.649。在治疗 3 个月后出现 0-100 分的排便困难的情况下,CHCs(p-score:0.805)是最有效的,而 CHCs 联合芳香化酶抑制剂(p-score:0.677)是治疗 6 个月后的最佳治疗方案。就总体盆腔疼痛而言,在治疗 3 个月后,CHCs(p-score:0.751)在 0-100 分的评分中获得最高的 p-score,而在治疗 6 个月后,孕激素联合芳香化酶抑制剂(p-score:0.873)获得最高的 p-score。孕激素(p-score:0.901)对治疗 3 个月后出现 0-3 级整体盆腔疼痛的病例最为有效。结论我们的网络荟萃分析表明,在痛经病例中,GnRH 促效剂辅以 CHCs 在治疗 3 个月后减轻疼痛的效果最佳。在痛经方面,CHCs 的疗效最好,而在整体盆腔疼痛方面,CHCs 或孕激素联合芳香化酶抑制剂的疗效最理想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信