Ancestral differences in anti-cancer treatment efficacy and their underlying genomic and molecular alterations.

IF 29.7 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Mei Luo, Jingwen Yang, Alejandro A Schaffer, Chengxuan Chen, Yuan Liu, Yamei Chen, Chunru Lin, Lixia Diao, Yong Zang, Yanyan Lou, Huda Salman, Gordon B Mills, Eytan Ruppin, Leng Han
{"title":"Ancestral differences in anti-cancer treatment efficacy and their underlying genomic and molecular alterations.","authors":"Mei Luo, Jingwen Yang, Alejandro A Schaffer, Chengxuan Chen, Yuan Liu, Yamei Chen, Chunru Lin, Lixia Diao, Yong Zang, Yanyan Lou, Huda Salman, Gordon B Mills, Eytan Ruppin, Leng Han","doi":"10.1158/2159-8290.CD-24-0827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Systematic multi-omics analysis revealed ancestry-dependent molecular alterations, but their impact on the efficacy of anti-cancer treatment is yet largely unknown. Here, we analyzed clinical trials from ClinicalTrials.gov and found that only 8,779/102,721 (8.5%) oncology clinical trials posted information on enrollment by race/ethnicity. The underrepresentation of non-White populations suggests that it remains challenging to determine differences in the efficacy of anti-tumor treatments among different racial groups. Through a comprehensive analysis of clinically actionable genes, imputed drug responses, and immune features, we identified potential differences in treatment response to targeted, chemo and immunotherapies between different ancestral populations. Further analysis of multiple independent cohorts confirmed some of our key findings. Such potential ancestral effects are also identified in response to emerging new treatments like CAR-T therapy and PROTACs. These findings are made publicly available in a comprehensive web portal, Ancestral Differences of Efficacy in Cancers (ADEC; https://hanlaboratory.com/ADEC), to facilitate their further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9430,"journal":{"name":"Cancer discovery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":29.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer discovery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-24-0827","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Systematic multi-omics analysis revealed ancestry-dependent molecular alterations, but their impact on the efficacy of anti-cancer treatment is yet largely unknown. Here, we analyzed clinical trials from ClinicalTrials.gov and found that only 8,779/102,721 (8.5%) oncology clinical trials posted information on enrollment by race/ethnicity. The underrepresentation of non-White populations suggests that it remains challenging to determine differences in the efficacy of anti-tumor treatments among different racial groups. Through a comprehensive analysis of clinically actionable genes, imputed drug responses, and immune features, we identified potential differences in treatment response to targeted, chemo and immunotherapies between different ancestral populations. Further analysis of multiple independent cohorts confirmed some of our key findings. Such potential ancestral effects are also identified in response to emerging new treatments like CAR-T therapy and PROTACs. These findings are made publicly available in a comprehensive web portal, Ancestral Differences of Efficacy in Cancers (ADEC; https://hanlaboratory.com/ADEC), to facilitate their further investigation.

抗癌疗效的祖先差异及其潜在的基因组和分子改变。
系统的多组学分析揭示了依赖于祖先的分子改变,但它们对抗癌治疗效果的影响在很大程度上还不为人所知。在此,我们分析了 ClinicalTrials.gov 中的临床试验,发现只有 8779/102721 项(8.5%)肿瘤临床试验公布了按种族/人种分类的入组信息。非白种人的代表性不足表明,确定不同种族群体之间抗肿瘤治疗效果的差异仍具有挑战性。通过对临床可作用基因、估算药物反应和免疫特征的综合分析,我们发现了不同祖先人群对靶向治疗、化疗和免疫疗法的治疗反应可能存在的差异。对多个独立队列的进一步分析证实了我们的一些重要发现。在对 CAR-T 疗法和 PROTACs 等新兴新疗法的反应中,我们也发现了这种潜在的祖先效应。这些发现将在一个综合门户网站--癌症疗效的祖先差异(ADEC; https://hanlaboratory.com/ADEC)上公布,以便于进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer discovery
Cancer discovery ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
1.40%
发文量
838
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Discovery publishes high-impact, peer-reviewed articles detailing significant advances in both research and clinical trials. Serving as a premier cancer information resource, the journal also features Review Articles, Perspectives, Commentaries, News stories, and Research Watch summaries to keep readers abreast of the latest findings in the field. Covering a wide range of topics, from laboratory research to clinical trials and epidemiologic studies, Cancer Discovery spans the entire spectrum of cancer research and medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信